Bernard Mandeville and the “Judicious Reader”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v10i3.49606Palabras clave:
Reader-response. Authorship. Critical thinking. Self-knowledge. Indeterminacy. Paradox.Resumen
Ever since the publication of the Fable of the Bees and its formulaic equation of private vices with public benefits, Mandeville has generally been regarded as an author who revelled in paradox; a master of irony and sarcasm. Whether he really meant to give free rein to private vices – the “laissez faire” of unbridled capitalism –, whether he did think that the poor should not be given access to education, or that prostitution should be institutionalised, is still a matter of discussion. If Mandeville’s provocative use of paradoxes has been the object of ample academic scrutiny, the author-reader relationship that results from this paradoxical mode of writing has generally been overlooked. In the present article, I wish to show that Mandeville is less interested in convincing the readers of the validity of his moral – or immoral – stances (whatever they may be) than in guiding them through the uncertain and disconcerting maze of critical thinking and self-knowledge.
Descargas
Citas
ANDERSON, P. B. “Splendor out of scandal: the Lucinda-Artesia Papers in The Female Tatler,” Philogical Quarterly, Jan. 1, 1936 (15), pp. 286–300.
ANIQ-FILALI, R. “The Self-conscious narrator: its satirical origin.” in Études anglaises, 1991, Oct-dec; 44(4): pp. 444–49.
BAKHTIN, M. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. ed. and trans. Caryl Emerson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1984.
BLEWITT, G. An Enquiry whether a general practice of virtue tends to the wealth or poverty, benefit or disadvantage of a people? In which the pleas offered by the author of the Fable of the Bees, or private vices publick benefits, for the usefulness of vice and roguery are considered. London: R. Wilkin, 1725.
BOOTH, W. C. “The Self-Conscious narrator in Comic Fiction before Tristram Shandy,” PMLA, vol. 67, n°2 (March 1952), pp. 163–185.
BRANCHI, A. “Mandeville’s Female Voices,” in Branchi, A. Pride, Manners, and Morals. Leyden: Brill, 2021, pp. 38–55.
BURTON, R. The Anatomy of Melancholy. Oxford: Henry Cripps, 1624.
BYGRAVE, S. Uses of education: Readings in Enlightenment in England. Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 2009.
CHIESSI, A. “Humorism A Posteriori: Fables and Dialogues as a Method in Mandeville’s Thought,” in E. B. Pires and J. Braga (ed.). Bernard de Mandeville’s Tropology of Paradoxes. Morals, Politics, Economics, and Therapy. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.
FISH, S. Self-Consuming Artifacts. The Experience of Seventeenth-century Literature. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1972.
GOLDSMITH, M. M. By a Society of Ladies: Essays in the Female Tatler. Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 1999.
GUION, B. “The Fable of the Bees: proles sine matre?” in E. B. Pires and J. Braga (ed.). Bernard de Mandeville’s Tropology of Paradoxes. Morals, Politics, Economics, and Therapy. Dordrecht: Springer, 2015.
HEDRICK, E. “A Modest Proposal in context: Swift, Politeness, and A Proposal for giving Badges to the Beggars”, Studies in Philology, vol. 114, n°4, Fall 2017, pp. 852–875. DOI: 10.1353/sip.2017.0030
HIND, G. “Mandeville’s Fable of the Bees as Menippean Satire,” Genre: Forms of Discourse and Culture, I (October 1968), pp. 307-316.
HOBBES, T. The Questions Concerning Liberty, Necessity, and Chance. London: Andrew Cook, 1656.
ISER, W. “Indeterminacy and the reader’s response in Prose fiction,” in J. Hillis Miller (ed.). Aspects of Narrative. New York and London: Columbia University Press, 1971, pp. 1–45.
KLEIMAN-LAFON, S. “Ancient medicine, modern quackery: hypochondria and the rhetoric of healing,” in Paddy Bullard and Alexis Tadié (eds.), The Ancients and the Moderns in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Studies in the Enlightenment, 2016, pp. 189–203.
LEAVIS, F. R. “The Irony of Swift,” in Determinations, critical essays. 1934; New York: Haskell House Publishers, 1970, p. 79–108.
MACHIAVELLI, N. The Prince. Ed. Q. Skinner & R. Price. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
MALLINSON, J. “Sorel et les préfaces de Francion,” Cahiers de l’Association internationale des études françaises, 1990, n°42, pp. 137–149.
MANDEVILLE, B. Some fables After the Easie and Familiar Method of Monsieur de la Fontaine. London: [Wellington], 1703.
MANDEVILLE, B. Typhon: or the Wars between the Gods and Giants: A Burlesque Poem in Imitation of the Comical Mons. Scarron. London: J. Pero, 1704.
MANDEVILLE, B. Æsop Dress’d, or a Collection of Fables Writ in Familiar Verse. London: Richard Wellington, 1704.
MANDEVILLE, B. The Virgin Unmask’d: or female Dialogues Betwixt an Elderly Maiden Lady, and her Niece. London: J. Morphew, 1709.
MANDEVILLE, B. A Modest Defence of Publick Stews: or, an essay upon Whoring. London: A. Moore, 1724.
MANDEVILLE, B. An Enquiry into the Causes of the Frequent Executions at Tyburn. London: J. Roberts, 1725.
MANDEVILLE, B. A Letter to Dion, Occasion’d by his Book call’d Alciphron, or The Minute Philosopher. London: J. Roberts, 1732.
MANDEVILLE, B. The Fable of the Bees, edited by F.B. Kaye, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1924.
MANDEVILLE, B. Free Thoughts on religion, The Church, and national Happiness, edited by Irwin Primer. London: Routledge, 2017.
MANDEVILLE, B. A Treatise of the Hypochondriack and Hysterick Diseases, edited by S. Kleiman-Lafon. Dordrecht: Springer, 2017.
PHIDDIAN, R. “Have you eaten yet? The reader in A Modest Proposal”, Studies in English literature, 1500-1900, Summer 1996, vol. 36; n°3, pp. 603–621.
PINKUS, P. “Mandeville’s Paradox”, in Irwin Primer (ed.), Mandeville Studies. Nex explorations in the art and thought of Dr. Bernard Mandeville (1760-1733), International Archives of the History of Ideas 81, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975, pp. 193–211.
POLLOCK, A. “Gender, Ridicule, and the Satire of Liberal Reform: “Manley,” Mandeville and the Female Tatler.” In Anthony Pollock (ed.). Gender and the Fictions of the Public Sphere, 1690-1755. New York: Routledge, 2008. DOI: 10.4324/9780203891087
PONGIGLIONE, F., & TOLONEN, M. “Mandeville on charity schools: Happiness, social order and the psychology of poverty.” Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 9, 1 (2016), pp. 82–100. DOI: 10.23941/ejpe.v9i1.215
RAWSON, C. J. Gulliver and the Gentle Reader, studies in Swift and our Time. London and Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973.
RODINO, R. H. “Varieties of Vexatious Experience in Swift and Others,” Papers on Language and Literature, summer 1982, 18 (3), pp. 325–347.
SHAFTESBURY, A. A. C., 3rd Earl of. Sensus Communis: an Essay on the Freedom of Wit and Humour. In a letter to a friend. London: Egbert Sanger, 1709.
SHAFTESBURY, A. A. C., 3rd Earl of. Soliloquy: or, Advice to an Author. London: J. Morphew, 1710.
SCHNEIDER, L. Paradox and Society: The Work of Bernard Mandeville. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Books, 1987.
SWIFT, J. A Tale of a Tub. Written for the Universal Improvement of Mankind. 2nd ed. London: John Nutt, 1704.
SWIFT, J. A Modest Proposal for Preventing the Children of Poor People from Being a Burthen to Their Parents, or the Country, and for making them Beneficial to the Publick. Dublin: S. Harding, 1729.
UPHAUS, R. The Impossible Observer: Reason and the Reader in Eighteenth-Century Prose. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, 1979.
WELCHMAN, J. “A Rhapsody Void of Order or Method: Mandeville’s The Fable of the Bees.” In Jonathan Lavery and Louis Groarke (eds.), Literary Form, Philosophical Content. Historical Studies of Philosophical genres. Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2010, pp. 142–154.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2022 Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Los derechos de autor para artículos publicados en esta revista son del autor, con derechos de primera publicación para la revista. Debido a que aparecen en esta revista de acceso público, los artículos son de uso gratuito, con atribuciones propias, en aplicaciones educativas y no comerciales.
