Building and dismantling organisational capacity and bureaucratic identity: an analysis of Ibama’s civil service examinations (1989 – 2022)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v14n1.2023.44346Keywords:
Recruitment examinations, Organizational capacity, Bureaucratic identity, Deforestation inspection, Policy dismantlingAbstract
This article investigates how the recruitment procedures for the selection of environmental inspectors in Ibama, Brazil’s leading federal environmental agency, have varied since the institution’s creation in 1989 until 2022. To explain the identified changes, the study considers the organisation’s accumulated experience and political context. It draws on 44 semi-structured interviews and analyses the content of all five examination booklets (caderno de questões) and their corresponding calls (editais) for the position of environmental analyst organised during Ibama’s history, with a focus on the subtopic “Regulation, Control, and Environmental Inspection”. For interpreting this data, I mainly used qualitative content analysis. I coded the data based on the following categories: eligibility requirements, regional allocation criteria, programmatic content, general structure of the exam, individual motivation to become an Ibama servant, impact of public exams on inspection activities, and impact of the political context on inspection activities. Exam booklets went through an additional quantitative analysis on the number of references to “deforestation”, “Amazon”, and “inspection”. My findings suggest that Ibama’s examinations between 2002 and 2013 reflect an incremental process of specialisation and technicalisation. This process enhanced the agency’s capacity to inspect deforestation and strengthened its identity around the ideal of environmental stewardship. In an attempt to fracture Ibama’s capacity and identity, the 2021 examination prompted a deliberate shift in selected candidates’ profiles.
Downloads
References
AGUIAR, M. Estudo introdutório e plano de organização do livro. In: CARDOSO JR., J. C. et al. (Org.) Assédio Institucional no Brasil: avanço do autoritarismo e desconstrução do Estado. Brasília, Associação dos Funcionários do Ipea, Editora da Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, 2022, p. 29-56.
ALBERTINI, M. Avaliação do impacto na transferência do treinamento e do suporte à aprendizagem do evento instrucional “Curso de Fiscalização Ambiental” do Ibama. Brasília, Escola Nacional de Administração Pública, 2013.
ARAÚJO, S. Environmental Policy in the Bolsonaro Government: the response of environmentalists in the legislative arena. Brazilian Political Science Review, v. 14, n. 2, 2020. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1590/1981-3821202000020005.
BARCELOS, E. Desregulação ambiental e disputas políticas: uma breve retrospectiva do desmonte do licenciamento ambiental no Brasil. Ambientes, v. 2, n. 2, 2020, p. 278-329. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48075/amb.v2i2.26589.
BAUER, M. et al. (Ed.) “Introduction: populists, democratic backsliding, and public administration”. In: Democratic Backsliding and Public Administration How Populists in Government Transform State Bureaucracies. Cambridge University Press, 2021, p. 1-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009023504.
BAUER, M.; KNILL, C. A Conceptual Framework for the Comparative Analysis of Policy Change: measurement, explanation and strategies of policy dismantling. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, v. 61, n. 1, 2014, p. 28-44. DOI: https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13876988.2014.885186.
BONOLI, G. Blame Avoidance and Credit Claiming Revisited. In: BONOLI, G.; NATALI, D. (Ed.) The Politics of the New Welfare State. Oxford University Press, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199645244.001.0001.
CARPENTER, D. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Princeton University Press, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv10crfk2.
FEARNSIDE, P. Desmonte da legislação ambiental brasileira. In: WEISS, J. (Ed.) Movimentos Socioambientais: lutas – avanços – conquistas – retrocessos – esperanças. Formosa, GO: Xapuri Socioambiental, 2019, p. 317-381.
FONSECA, I. et al. Deforestation (lack of) control in the Brazilian Amazon: from strengthening to dismantling governmental authority (1999-2020). Sustainability in Debate, v. 13, n. 2, p. 12-31, 2022. DOI: 10.18472/SustDeb.v13n2.2022.44532.
FONTAINHA, F. et al. O concurso público brasileiro e a ideologia concurseira. Revista Jurídica da Presidência, v. 16, n. 110, 2015, p. 671-702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20499/2236-3645.RJP2015v16e110-38.
GRAHAM, L. Civil Service Reform in Brazil. University of Texas Press, 1968. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7560/783560.
GRISA, C.; NIEDERLE, P. Paradigms, institutional changes and policy dismantling in the Mercosur Specialized Meeting of Family Farming. Lua Nova, v. 112, 2021, p. 251-282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-251282/112.
HOOD, C.; MARGETTS, H. The Tools of Government in the Digital Age. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00756_4.x.
HOOD, C.; LODGE, M. The Politics of Public Service Bargains. Oxford University Press, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/019926967X.001.0001.
JORDAN, A. et al. Policy dismantling. Journal of European Public Policy, v. 20, n. 5, 2013, p. 795-805. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.771092.
KLÜGER, E. Meritocracia de Laços: gênese e reconfigurações do espaço dos economistas no Brasil. Ph. D. Dissertation. Universidade de São Paulo, 2017.
KLÜGER, E. Construindo uma burocracia econômica de excelência: concursos de seleção para o Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social (BNDES), de 1955 a 2012. Plural, v. 22, n. 2, p. 81-111, 2015a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-8099.pcso.2015.112451.
KLÜGER, E. A contraposição das noções de técnica e política nos discursos de uma elite burocrática. Revista de Sociologia Política, v. 23, n. 55, p. 75-96, 2015b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-987315235505.
LEVITSKY, S.; ZIBLATT, D. How Democracies Die. Penguin House, 2018.
LINDAHL, H. Authority and Globalisation of Inclusion and Exclusion. Cambridge University Press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316819203.
MAIA, B. Virando Estado: o processo de sujeição burocrática entre candidatos ao serviço público no Brasil. Runa, v. 41, n. 2, p. 203-219, 2020. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.34096/runa.v41i2.7271.
MEDEIROS, R. Desigualdade categórica e reserva de oportunidade no Concurso de Admissão à Carreira Diplomática. Revista de Ciências Sociais, v. 52, n. 2, 2021, p. 313–339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36517/rcs.52.2.a02.
MELLO, N.; ARTAXO, P. Evolução do Plano de Ação para Prevenção e Controle do Desmatamento na Amazônia Legal. Revista do Instituto de Estudos Brasileiros, v. 66, p. 108-129, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-901X.v0i66p108-129.
MENEZES, R.; BARBOSA JR., R. Environmental governance under Bolsonaro: dismantling institutions, curtailing participation, delegitimising opposition. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, v. 15, p. 229–247, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-021-00491-8.
NAVARRO, H. Lições Aprendidas no Uso do Sensoriamento Remoto e dos Sistemas de Informação Geográficas para a Gestão Pública das Florestas Brasileiras. Brasília, Escola Nacional de Administração Pública, 2016.
RAJÃO, R.; VURDUBAKIS, T. On the Pragmatics of Inscription. Theory, Culture & Society, v. 0, n. 0, 2013, p. 1-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276413486203.
SABOURIN, E. et al. The Dismantling of Family Farming Policies in Brazil and Argentina. International Review of Public Policy, v. 2, n. 1, p. 45-67, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.799.
SCANTIMBURGO, A. O desmonte da agenda ambiental no governo Bolsonaro. Perspectivas, v. 52, p. 103-117, 2020.
SILVA, F. et al. Assédio institucional no setor público e o processo de desconstrução da democracia e do republicanismo no Brasil de Bolsonaro. In: CARDOSO JR., J. et al. (Org.) Assédio Institucional no Brasil: avanço do autoritarismo e desconstrução do Estado. Brasília, Associação dos Funcionários do Ipea, Editora da Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, 2022, p. 115-149.
SILVA, M. Policy dismantling by capacity manipulation in a context of democratic backsliding: the bureaucracy in disarray in Bolsonaro’s Brazil. International Review of Public Policy, v. 3, n. 3, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/irpp.3001.
SILVA, M.; GOMIDE, A. (Ed). Introduction. The policy process in democratic backsliding: what have we learned from illiberal populist governments? In: In the wake of illiberal populism: the policy process in democratic backsliding. Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming.
TUSHNET, M. Constitutional Hardball. The John Marshall Law Review, v. 37, n. 2, p. 523-554, 2004.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sustainability in Debate
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.
