Relevance and feasibility of women's involvement in promoting sustainable food production and security in Southern Africa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18472/SustDeb.v5n2.2014.10757Keywords:
Women, Food Production, Food Security, Southern AfricaAbstract
Harnessing women’s potential for food production and security has been a challenge in Southern Africa. The face of food production in Southern Africa is often female, but more often than not, their roles are generally undervalued and constrained by gender inequalities and limitations on their access to resources, services, and market opportunities. This chapter explores how women involvement in food production can have a positive impact on food security in Southern Africa. The gender aspect of food security assume significance, as it is widely recognized that women are the custodian of food production in many communities in Southern Africa. There is a tendency of men and women participating unevenly in food production, have unequal access to productive resources and exhibit different levels of engagement in rural, urban and home-based food production. Despite this anomaly, there is still a common understanding that food production needs to be increased in order to cope with the increased human population and achieving food security in the region. With this in mind, food production and security have emerged as key development targets in Southern Africa. This has propelled the urgent need for promoting food production, reducing food insecurity and poverty reduction in its totality. One of the factors contributing to perpetual low food production and insecurity has been gender discrimination and/or lack of participation of women in agricultural programs and projects. In this chapter there is an attempt to describe the impact of gender-based discrimination on food production and its implication on food security. The indispensable role and challenges faced by women in food production are highlighted. The need to invest in education and training of women to support food production systems in order to accrue maximum benefit is acknowledged. In this regard, it is imperative that planning and implementation of any food production programs focusing on improving food security should be based on gender sensitive policies. Policies which give women due recognition as far as food production decision making processes are concerned are sought. The chapter concludes with the understanding that involvement of women in food production becomes a key component of addressing food insecurity in Southern Africa. The vulnerability of people in Southern Africa to food insecurity depends both on measures that can be implemented in a given context and the capacity of families, and women in particular, to respond to food shortages. It is important, therefore that food security remains high on the regional development agenda. The region should prioritize appropriate interventions which help women fully participate in food production and develop sustainable livelihoods.
Downloads
References
Politics in South and Southeast Asia. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 1999.
ADEBAYO, J. Educating women in Northern States. The Nigeria Tribune. 1997.
ADEKUNLE, A. Modern analysis economics. Ibadan: Aromolatan, 1978.
ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK. Gender equality and food security””women’s
empowerment as a tool against hunger. Mandaluyong City: Asian Development
Bank, 2013.
AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK; FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION. Gender
equality and food security-Women’s empowerment as a tool against hunger.
Mandaluyong City: Asian Development Bank, 2013.
ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK; INTERNATIONAL LABOUR ORGANIZATION. Women
and Labour Markets in Asia: Rebalancing for Gender Equality. Bangkok: ILO,
2011.
BARDASI, E.; BLACKDEN, M.C.; GUZMAN, J.C. Gender, entrepreneurship and
competitiveness in Africa: The Africa Competitiveness. Report World Bank, 2007.
BODEN, S.; ZOE, O. Gender and Empowerment: Definition Approaches and
Implication for Policy. Institute of Development Studies, Brigton: 1997.
CRUSH J.S.; FRAYNE, G.B. Urban food insecurity and the new international food
security agenda. Development Southern Africa, 2011
DENTON, F. Climate Change Vulnerability, Impacts, and Adaptation: Why does
Gender Matter? Gender and Development 10. IPCC, 2007.
DOSS, C. R. Twenty-five years of research on women farmers in Africa: Lessons
and implications for agricultural institutions. Mexico DF: CIMMYT Economics
Program Paper, 1999.
DOSS, C.; DEERE C.D.; ODURO, A.; SWAMINATHAN, H.; SUCHITRA, J;Y., LAHOTI, R.;
BAAH-BOATENG, W.; YIADOM, L.B.; CONTRERAS, J.; TWYMAN, J.; CATANZARITE,
Z.; GROWN, C.; HILLESLAND, M. The Gender Asset and Wealth Gaps: Evidence
from Ecuador, Ghana and Karnataka, India. Bangalore: Indian Institute of
Management, 2011.
DWYER, D.; BRUCE, J. (Org.). A home divided: women and income in the Third
World. Stanford: Stanford University, 1998.
FENT, A. Philanthropy and Sovereignty: A critical feminist exploration of the
Gates Foundation’s approach to gender and agriculture development. In:
Reclaiming food sovereignty in Africa. Concerned Africa Scholars, 2012.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURAL ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS. Women,
Agriculture and Rural Development. In: Corporate Documents Repository,
Economic and Social Development Department: A synthesis report of the Near East
Region Adapted from Human Development Report and Country Papers. UNDP, 1994.
______________________. Rome declaration on World Food Security and World
Food Summit Plan of Action. World Food Summit, 13-17 November. Rome, 1996.
______________________. The State of Food and Agriculture 2010”“2011: Women
in Agriculture: Closing the Gender Gap for Development. Rome, 2011.
GALOR, O.; WEIL, D.N. The Gender Gap, Fertility and Growth. In: GARCIA, M.; PENCE,
A.; EVANS, J. (Org.). The American Economic Review. Africa’s Future, Africa’s
Challenge: Early Childhood Care and Development in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Washington: World Bank, 1996.
GAWAYA, R. Investing in Women Farmers to Eliminate Food Insecurity in Southern
Africa: Policy Related Research from Mozambique. Gender and Development 16,
no. 1, 2008.
GITTINGER, J.P.; LESLIE, J.; HOISINGTON, C. Food policy: Integrating supply,
distribution and consumption. London: John Hopkins Press, 1987.
GROSS, R.; SCHULTINK, W.; KIELMANN, A. A. Community nutrition: definition and
approaches.Encyclopedia of human nutrition. London: Academic Press, 1998.
HARDOUIN, J.; THYS, E.; JOIRIS, V.; FIELDING, D. Mini-livestock breeding with
indigenous species in the tropics. Rural Dev, 2003.
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE. FOOD FOR EDUCATION. A
Review of Program Impacts: Prepared for Millennium Task Force on Hunger.
Washington: IFPRI, 2004.
INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE. Reaching sustainable food
security for all by 2020: Getting the priorities and responsibilities right.
Washington: IFPRI, 2002.
____________________. Technical guides for operationalizing household food
security in development projects. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division.
Washington: 1999.
KABEER, N. Women’s economic empowerment and inclusive growth: Labour
markets and enterprise development. School of Oriental and African Studies. SIG
Working Paper, 2012.
KABEER, N.; NOPONEN, H. Social and economic impacts of PRADAN’s Self Help
Group Microfinance and Livelihoods Promotion Program: analysis from
Jharkhand, India’ Imp-Act. Online, 2004. Available at: www.ids.ac.uk/impact/
publications/working¬_papers.html.
KANESATHASAN, A.; JACOBS, K.; YOUNG, M.; SHETTY, A. Capturing the gender
effect: Guidance for gender measurements for agriculture programs.
International Center for Research on Women, 2013.
KARL, M. Inseparable: The crucial role of women in food security revisited.
Women in Action, No 1, 2009.
MCFERSON, H. M. Poverty among women in sub-saharan Africa: A review of
selected issues. Journal of International Women’s Studies 1, 2008.
MWANIKI, A. Achieving food security in Africa: Challenges and issues. US Plant,
Soil and Nutrion Laboratory. Cornell University, 2003.
____________________. The Utilization of Locally Grown Plant Materials in the
Production of an Intervention Formulation for Malnourished Children in
Marginal Areas: The Case of Makindu Location Makueni District. Master’s Thesis.
Kenya: University of Nairobi, 2003.
OLATOKUN, W.M.; AYANBODE, O.F. Use of indigenous knowledge by women in a
Nigerian rural community. Indian J. Traditional Knowledge, 2009.
QUISUMBING, A.; PANDOLFELLI, L. Promising approaches to address the needs
of poor female farmers. Paper provided by International Food Policy Research
Institute (IFPRI) in its series Research briefs with number 13.2033.Online. 2003.
Available at: http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/publications/in13.pdf.
SMITH, C. Rates of genetic change in farm livestock. Res. Dev. Agric. 1984.
STEWART, F. Employment, income distribution and development. Frankcass ,
1975.
THE HUNGER PROJECT. Factsheet: Women Farmers and Food Security. Weisfeld-
Adams, Emma, 2008.
UNIFEM. Progress of world’s women. New York: UNIFEM, 2007.
UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM. Biodiversity for development. UNDP,
2008.
UNITED NATIONS POPULATION INFORMATION NETWORK. Women Population and
Environment in Agricultural and Rural Development Policy Challenges and
Responses. 1994.
WORLD BANK. World Development Report. New York: Oxford University, 1996.
________________. World Development Report 2012. Washington, DC. 2011.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
SUSTAINABILITY IN DEBATE – Copyright Statement
The submission of original scientific work(s) by the authors, as the copyright holders of the text(s) sent to the journal, under the terms of Law 9.610/98, implies in the concession of copyrights of printed and/or digital publication to the Sustainability in Debate Journal of the article(s) approved for publication purposes, in a single issue of the journal. Furthermore, approved scientific work(s) will be released without any charge, or any kind of copyright reimbursement, through the journal’s website, for reading, printing and/or downloading of the text file, from the date of acceptance for publication purposes. Therefore, the authors, when submitting the article (s) to the journal, and gratuitous assignment of copyrights related to the submitted scientific work, are fully aware that they will not be remunerated for the publication of the article(s) in the journal.
The Sustainability in Debate Journal is licensed under Creative Commons License – Non-Commercial-No-Derivation Attribution (Derivative Work Ban) 3.0 Brazil, aiming at dissemination of scientific knowledge, as indicated on the journal's website, which allows the text to be shared, and be recognized in regards to its authorship and original publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed to sign additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the works published in the Sustainability in Debate Journal (for example, in a book chapter), provided that it is expressed the texts were originally published in this journal. Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish and distribute their text online, following publication in Sustainability in Debate (e.g. in institutional repositories or their personal pages). The authors expressly agree to the terms of this Copyright Statement, which will be applied following the submission and publishing by this journal.