(Re) Approaching the pragmatisms of public policy analysis. Experimentation and public inquiry in a scenario of democratic crises.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202136020007Keywords:
Análise de Políticas Públicas, Governança Pública, Pragmatismo, Experimentalismo Democrático, Investigação PúblicaAbstract
This theoretical essay explores the contributions of the pragmatist lens to the analysis of public policy governance in a scenario of crisis in democracies. To this end, it begins by exploring the recent debate in the field of public administration on governance and the analysis of public policies, showing that this refers to a double dichotomy: between ways of governing and reforming the State and ways of analyzing public policies and its effects. From the gaps evidenced in this debate, we enter into the discussion about the notions of democratic experimentalism and public inquiry and discuss how such notions can be inspiring to look at daily “doing politics” differently, especially considering the current challenges posed by public problems increasingly complex in a reality of crisis and democratic regression in several countries e, above all, in Brazil.
Downloads
References
AMARAL M. Dewey: filosofia e experiência democrática. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2007.
ANDION, C. Por uma nova interpretação das mudanças de paradigma na administração pública. Cadernos Ebape. BR, v. 10, n. 1, p. 1-19, 2012.
ANSELL, C. Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship Online, 2011.
ANSELL, C. What is democratic experiment? Contemporary Pragmatism, v. 9, n. 2, p. 159-180, 2012.
ANSELL, C; SØRENSEN, E.; TORFING, J. The COVID-19 pandemic as a game changer for public administration and leadership? The need for robust governance responses to turbulent problems, Public Management Review, 2020. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2020.1820272
BAUMAN, Z. Em busca da política. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar, 2000.
BOHMAN, J. Réaliser la démocratie délibérative comme mode d’enquête : le pragmatisme, les faits sociaux et la théorie normative. Traces Revue de Sciences Himaines, 2008.
BOHMAN, J. Democratic Experimentalism: From Self-Legislation to Self-Determination. Contemporary Pragmatism, n.9, v.2, 2012
BOULLOSA, R. Mirando ao revés nas políticas públicas: notas sobre um percurso de pesquisa. Pensamento e Realidade, v.8, n.3, 2013.
BOVET, A ; TERZI, C. “La composante narrative des controverses politiques et médiatiques: pour une analyse praxéologique des actions et des mobilisations collectives”. Réseaux, n.132, p.111-132, 2012.
BRIGGS, X. Democracy as Problem Solving: Civic Capacity in Communities Across the Globe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008.
CABRAL, Caio. As Bases Naturalísticas da Teoria da Investigação de John Dewey. Dissertação de Mestrado (Filosofia). Faculdade de Filosofia, Letras e Ciências Humanas da Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo – SP, 2014.
CASTELLS, M. Ruptura: a crise da democracia liberal. Tradução: Melo, Joana Angélica d’Avila. São Paulo: Zahar, 2018.
CEFAÏ, D. Qu’est-ce qu’une arène publique? Quelques pistes pour une approche pragmatiste. In CEFAÏ, Daniel; JOSEPH, Isaac (Org.). L’héritage du pragmatisme. Conflits d’urbanité et épreuves de civisme. Paris: La Tour d’Aigues; Éditions de l’Aube, 2002.
CEFAÏ, D. Diez propuestas para el estudio de las movilizaciones colectivas. De la experiencia al compromiso. Revista de Sociología, Santiago de Chile. n. 26, p. 137-166, 2011.
CEFAÏ, D. ¿Qué es una arena pública? Algunas pautas para un acercamiento pragmático. In. CEFAÏ, D.; JOSEPH, I. (Org.). La herencia del pragmatismo. Conflictos de urbanidad y pruebas de civismo. La Tour d’Aigues: Éditions de l’Aube, p. 51-81, 2012.
CEFAÏ, D. L’enquête ethnographique comme écriture. l’écriture ethnographique comme enquête. Écrire en sciences sociales, Paris: Imed Melliti (ed.), 2014.
CEFAÏ, D. Públicos, problemas públicos, arenas públicas: o que nos ensina o pragmatismo. Novos estud. CEBRAP, vol.36, no.1, p.187-213, mar 2017.
CEFAÏ, D; TERZI, Cedric. L’expérience de problèmes publics. Paris: Perspectives Pragmatistes, 2012.
CHATEAURAYNAUD, F. Argumenter dans un champ de forces: essai de balistique sociologique. Paris: Éditions Petra, 2011.
COMMAILLE, Jacques ; JOBERT, Bruno. Les métamorphoses de la régulation politique, Paris, Droit et Société, vol 24, 381, 1999.
CONSIDINE, Mark. Making Public Policy: Institutions, Actors, Strategies. Polity, 2005.
DALLA CORTE, T.; DALLA CORTE, T. A democracia no século XXI: crise, conceito e qualidade. Passagens. Revista Internacional de História Política e Cultura Jurídica Rio de Janeiro: v. 10, n.2, 2018.
DENHARDT, J.; DENHARDT, R. The new public service: Steering, not serving. New York: Sharpe, 2003.
DEWEY, J. The public and its problems. Chicago: Swallow Press, 1927.
DEWEY, J. Lógica: teoría de la investigación. New York, Holt, 1956.
DORF, M. C.; SABEL, C.F. A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism. Columbia Law Review, v.98, n.2, 1998. Doi:10.2307/1123411.
DYE, Thomas R. Policy analysis: what governments do, why they do it, and what difference it makes. University of Alabama Press, 1976.
FARAH, M. F. Análise de políticas públicas no Brasil: de uma prática não nomeada à institucionalização do "campo de públicas". Rev. Adm. Pública v.50, n.6, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7612150981.
FERREIRA, M. C. The notion of experience in John Dewey, progressive education and science curriculum. Anais. DO VIII ENPEC, Campinas – SP: 2011.
FESTENSTEIN, M. Inquiry as Critique: on the Legacy of Deweyan Pragmatism for Political Theory. Political Studies, v.49, n.4, 2001.
FESTENSTEIN, M. Inquiry as Critique: On the Legacy of Deweyan Pragmatism for Political Theory. Political Studies v.49, n.4, 2001.
FISCHER, F; FORESTER, J. The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Duke University Press Books, 1996.
FISCHER, F., MILLER, G; SIDNEY, M. Handbook of Public Policy Analysis. Ed. by: Taylor & Francis, 2007.
FISCHER, F. GERALD, J.; SIDNEY, M. Handbook of Public Policy Analysis, Theory, Politics and Methods. Boca Raton, London New York, 2007.
FREGA, R. Pragmatism and the wide view of Democracy. Gewerbestrasse, witzerland: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
FUKUYAMA, J. Is Democracy in Decline? Journal of Democracy, v.26, n.1, 2015.
FUNG, A. Deliberative Democracy and International Labor Standards. Governance, v16, n.1, 2002.
GONSALVES; A; ANDION, C. ANDION, C. Ação Pública e inovação social: uma análise do Sistema de Garantia de Direitos da Criança e do Adolescente de Florianópolis. Revista O&S, v.2, n.3 2019.
GUERREIRO RAMOS, A. A modernização em nova perspectiva: em busca do modelo da possibilidade. In: HEIDEMANN, F. G.; SALM, J. F. (Org.). Políticas públicas e desenvolvimento: bases epistemológicas e modelos de análise. Brasília, DF: Ed. UnB, 2009.
HABERMAS, J. Mudança estrutural na esfera pública. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1984.
HOWLETT, M.; RAMESH, M.; PERL, A. Política Pública: Seus ciclos e subsistemas: uma abordagem integral. Tradução técnica Francisco G. Heidemann. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2013.
IAZZETTA, Osvaldo. Democracia, calidad de la democracia y democratización. Revista Debates, Porto Alegre, v. 7, n. 1, p. 139-150, jan./abr. 2013.
KARSENTI, B.; QUÉRÉ, L. La croyance et l’enquête. Raisons Pratiques, Éditions de l’EHESS, v. 15, 2004.
KISSLER, L.; HEIDEMANN, F. G. Governança pública: novo modelo regulatório para as relações entre Estado, mercado e sociedade? Revista de Administração Pública RAP, v.40, n.3, 2006.
LASCOUMES, Pierre; LE GALÈS, Patrick. Sociologia da Ação Pública. Maceió: EDUFAL, 2012.
LASWELL, H. D. Politics: who gets what, when, how. Cleveland: Meridian Books, 1936/1958)
LASSWELL, H. D. The decision process: seven categories of functional analysis. College Park, 1956.
LEFORT, C. The Political Forms of Modern Society: Bureaucracy, Democracy, Totalitarianism. David Thompson, 1986.
LEVISTIKY, E.; WAY, L. The Myth of Democratic Recession. Journal of Democracy, v.26, n.1, 2015.
LEVISTIKY, E; ZIBLATT, D. How Democracies Dies. Scorpio Press, 2019.
LINDBLOM, C. The Science of "Muddling Through. Public Administration Review, v.19, n.2, 1959.
LIPSKY, Michael. Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. Russell Sage Foundation, 1980.
MARCH, J. G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, n.2, 1991.
LYINN, L.E. Design Public Policy: a casebook on the role of policy analysis. Santa Monica: Goodyear, 1980
MARQUES, E. FARIA, A. A Política Pública como Campo Multidisciplinar. São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro: Editora Unesp, Editora Fiocruz, 2013.
MONEDERO, J. C. 15M and indignant democracy: legitimation problems within neoliberal capitalism, pp. 21–63 in PEREIRA, Ó.; TORRES, S. L. (eds.), Spain after the Indignados/15M Movement. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.
MOTTA, P. R. M. O estado da arte da gestão pública. Rev. adm. empresa. v.53, n.1, 2013.
MULLER, Pierre. Les entrepreneurs ruraux: agriculteurs, artisans, commerçants, élus locaux. Université des sciences sociales de Grenoble, 1989.
OFFE, C. New Social Movements: challenging the boundaries of institutional politics. Social Research, v. 52, 1996.
PAGE, Edward C. How policy is really made. Public Management and Policy Association, London, 2006.
OFFE, C. New Social Movements: challenging the boundaries of institutional politics. Social Research, v. 52, 1996.
POLLITT; C; BOUCKAER B. Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Long Range Planning, v.33, n.6, 2002.
QUÉRÉ, L; TERZI, C. Pour une sociologie pragmatiste de l’experience publique. Quelques apports mutuels de la philosophie pragmatiste et de l’ethnométhodologie. SociologieS. [en ligne]. Dossiers. Pragmatisme et sciences sociales: explorations, enquêtes, experimentations, 2015.
RADIN, B. A. Beyond Machiavelli: Policy Analysis Comes of Age. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2000.
ROSE, Richard. Getting things done with social capital. New Russia Barometer VII Studies in Public Policy, n.303, 1994.
SABEL, C. Dewey, Democracy and Democratic Experimentalism. Contemporary Pragmatism, v.9, n.2, 2012.
SANTOS, B. de S. Public Sphere and Epistemologies of the South. África Development, v.37, n.1, 2012.
SANTOS, B. de S; AVRITZER, L. Para Ampliar o Cânone Democrático. In: SANTOS, B. S. (Org.). Democratizar a Democracia. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira, 2003.
SIMON, H. A. Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization, second edition, New York: Macmillan, 1957.
SHIELDS, P. M. The Community of Inquiry: Insights for Public Administration from Jane Addams, John Dewey and Charles S. Pierce. Public Administration Theory Network, 2008.
SOUZA, C. Estado da arte da pesquisa em políticas públicas. In.: HOCHMAN, G. ; ARRETCHE, M.; MARQUES, E. (org.) Políticas públicas no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro : Editora FIOCRUZ, 2007. p.65-86.
STAVO-DEBAUGE, J. Le loup dans la bergerie : le fondamentalisme chrétien à l’assaut de l’espace public, Genève, Labor & Fides, 2012.
STAVO-DEBAUGE, J ; TROM D. Le pragmatisme et son public à l’épreuve du terrain. Penser avec Dewey contre Dewey in B. Karsenti & L. Quéré (dir.) La croyance et l’enquête. Aux sources du pragmatisme Raisons Pratiques, 15, Paris, Editions de l’EHESS, 2004.
STONE, D. Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making. New York : W.W. Norton & Company, 2002.
TERZI, C. The publicization of public space. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. Vol 49, Issue 3, 2015.
THOENIG, Jean-Claude. L'ère des Technocrates: le Cas des Ponts et Chaussées. Paris: Edition l'Harmattan, 1973.
ECONOMIST INTELLIGENCE UNIT. Democracy Index 2020: In sickness and in health? 2020.
ZASK, J. L’enquête sociale comme inter-objectivation , La croyance et l’enquête. Aux sources du pragmatisme, Paris, EHESS. Raisons pratiques, n.15, 2004.
ZIMMERMANN, B. Pragmatism and the capability approach: Challenges in social theory and empirical research. European Journal of Social Theory v.9, n.4, 2006.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Sociedade e Estado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
