Pre-experimental Stimuli Functions in Equivalence Class Formation

Authors

  • Verônica Bender Haydu Universidade Estadual de Londrina
  • Carolyne Tomaz de Aquino Universidade Estadual de Londrina
  • Larissa Botelho Gaça Universidade Federal de São Paulo
  • Gerson Yukio Tomanari Universidade de São Paulo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e3524

Keywords:

Equivalence classes, Romantic jealousy, Conditional relations, Matching-to-sample

Abstract

Can pre-experimental conditional relations that elicit emotional responses, such as jealousy, affect the formation of equivalence classes? Would there be differences between men and women? To address these questions, 19 participants of both sexes were exposed to training and testing of the formation of four equivalence classes, one consisting of the boyfriend’s/girlfriend’s name, an unknown woman’s/man’s name, and two unfamiliar figures. After the tests, the Romantic Jealousy Scale was applied. Participants classified as having a higher degree of jealousy did not form equivalence classes regardless of whether they were men or women. It is suggested that pre-experimental relations with affective functions interfere in the formation of equivalence classes in which the boyfriend’s/girlfriend’s name should be related to the unknown woman’s/man’s name.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Verônica Bender Haydu, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Departamento de Psicologia Geral e Análise do Comportamento, Mestrado em Análise do Comportamento,Universidade Estadual de Londrina.

Carolyne Tomaz de Aquino, Universidade Estadual de Londrina

Departamento de Psicologia Geral e Análise do Comportamento, Universidade Estadual de Londrina.

Gerson Yukio Tomanari, Universidade de São Paulo

Instituto de psicologia da Universidade de São Paulo  

References

Adcock, A. C., Merwin, R. M., Wilson, K. G., Drake, C. E., Tucker, C. I., & Elliott, C. (2010). The problem is not learning: Facilitated acquisition of stimulus equivalence classes among low achieving college students. The Psychological Record, 60, 43-56.

Arntzen, E., & Lian, T. (2010). Trained and derived relations with pictures versus abstract stimuli as nodes. The Psychological Record, 60, 659-677.

Buss, D. B. (1994). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.

Capocio, V. P. (2008). Software Equivalência [Programa de computador]. Ribeirão Pires, SP.

Clayton, M. C., & Hayes, L. J. (2007). Using stimulus equivalence to demonstrate pre-existing linguistic relations: A systematic replication and extension. Revista Mexicana de Análisis de la Conducta, 33, 225-238. doi: 10.5514/rmac.v33.i2.16257

de Carvalho, M. P., & de Rose, J. C. (2014). Understanding racial attitudes through the stimulus equivalence paradigm. The Psychological Record, 64, 527-536.

Costa, N. (2009). Busca de definição operacional de ciúme: Uma construção teórica e empírica (Tese de doutorado). Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Brasil.

Costa, N., Almeida, C., Gomes, H., Lobato, J., Gondim, L., Silva, M., ... Lima, V. A. (2014). O ciúme está relacionado ao amor: Contribuições de uma perspectiva analítico-comportamental. Perspectivas em Análise do Comportamento, 5, 40-48. Recuperado de http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/pdf/pac/v5n1/v5n1a04.pdf

Dack, C., McHugh, L., & Reed, P. (2012). Transfer of judgments of control to a target stimulus and to novel stimuli through derived relations. Learning and Behavior, 40, 448-464. doi: 10.3758/s13420-012-0066-6

Dougher, M. J. (1998). Stimulus equivalence and the untrained acquisition of stimulus functions. Behavior Therapy, 29, 577-591. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7894(98)8001 8-X

Dougher, M. J., Augustson, E., Markham, M. R., Greenway, D. E., & Wulfert, E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 331-351. doi: 10.1901 /jeab.1 994.62-331

Dixon, M. R., Bihler, H. L., & Nastally, B. L. (2011). Slot machine preferences of pathological and recreational gamblers are verbally constructed. The Psychological Record, 61, 93-112.

Dixon, M. R., & Lemke, M. (2007). Reducing prejudice towards Middle Eastern persons as terrorists. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 8, 5-12.

Fields, L., Arntzen, E., Nartey, R. K., & Eilifsen, C. (2012). Effects of a meaningful, a discriminative, and a meaningless stimulus on equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 163-181. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-163.

Haydu, V. B., Gaça, L. B., Cognetti, N. P., Costa, C. E., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2015). Equivalência de estímulos e ciúme: Efeito de história pré-experimental. Psicologia Reflexão e Crítica, 28, 490-499. doi: 10.1590/1678-7153.201528308

Keenan, M., McGlinchey, A., Fairhurst, C., & Dillenburger, K. (2000). Accuracy of disclosure and contextual control in child abuse: Developing procedures within the stimulus equivalence paradigm. Behavior and Social Issues, 10, 1-17. doi: 10.5210/bsi.v10i0.131

Leslie, J. C., Ulster-Jordanstown, U., Tierney, K. J., Robinson, C. P., & Keenan, M. (1993). Differences between clinically anxious and non-anxious subjects in a stimulus equivalence training task involving threat words. Psychological Record, 43, 153-161.

Merwin, R. M., & Wilson, K. G. (2005). Preliminary findings on the effects of self-referring and evaluative stimuli on stimulus equivalence class formation. The Psychological Record, 55, 561-575.

Munnelly, A., Martin, G., Dack, C., Zedginidze, A., & McHugh, L. (2014). The transfer of social exclusion and inclusion functions through derived stimulus relations. Learning & Behavior, 42, 270-280. doi: 10.3758/s13420-014-0144-z

O’Connor, J., Rafferty, A., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2009). The role of verbal behavior, stimulus nameability, and familiarity on the equivalence performances of autistic and normally developing children. The Psychological Record, 59, 53-74.

Plaud, J. J. (1995). The formation of stimulus equivalence classes: Fear-relevant and fear-irrelevant stimulus classes. The Psychological Record, 45, 207-222.

Plaud, J. J., Gaither, G. A., Franklin, M., Weller, L. A., & Barth, J. (1998). The effects of sexually explicit words on the formation of stimulus equivalence classes. The Psychological Record, 48, 63-79.

Postalli, L. M. M., Schmidt, A, Nakachima, R. Y., & de Souza, D. G. (2013). Controle instrucional e classes de estímulos equivalentes que incluem verbos e ações. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 26, 136-150. doi: 10.1590/S0102-79722013000100015

Ramos, A. L. M., Yazawa, S.A.K., & Salazar, A. F. (1994). Desenvolvimento de uma escala de ciúme romântico. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 10, 439-451.

Rehfeldt, R. A. (2011). Toward a technology of derived stimulus relations: An analysis of articles published in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1992-2009. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44, 109-19. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2011.44-109.

de Rose, J. C., & Bortoloti, R. (2007). A equivalência de estímulos como modelo do significado. Acta Comportamentalia, 15, 83-102.

Santos, S. L., Mizael, T. M., & de Rose, J. C. (2016). Contribuições do paradigma de equivalência de estímulos para o estudo das atitudes. Interação em Psicologia, 20, 124-134. doi: 10.5380/psi.v20i2.46278

Sidman, M. (1990). Equivalence relations: Where do they come from? In H. Lejuene & D. Blackman (Orgs.), Behavior analysis in theory and practice: Contributions and controversies (pp. 93-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Sidman, M. (1994). Equivalence relations: A research story. Boston: Authors Cooperative.

Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127-146. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127.

Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5

Valverde, M. R., Luciano, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2009). Transfer of aversive respondent elicitation in accordance with equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 92, 85-111. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2009.92-85

Watt, A., Keenan, M., Barnes, D., & Cairns, E. (1991). Social categorization and stimulus equivalence. The Psychological Record, 41, 33-50.

Wulfert, E., Greenway, D. E., Farkas, P., Hayes, S. C. & Dougher, M. J. (1994). Correlation between self-reported rigidity and rul-governed insensitivity to operant contingencies. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 659-671. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-659

Published

2019-03-08

How to Cite

Haydu, V. B., Aquino, C. T. de, Gaça, L. B., & Tomanari, G. Y. (2019). Pre-experimental Stimuli Functions in Equivalence Class Formation. Psicologia: Teoria E Pesquisa, 35. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e3524

Issue

Section

Estudos Empíricos

Most read articles by the same author(s)