Iconicity and Complexity in Hypnotic Communication
Keywords:
Iconicity, Hypnotic communication, Complexity, Semiotics, TranceAbstract
The present paper proposes a theoretical approximation between iconicity, which ability of signs to transmit the resemblance with objects, and a complex perspective of hypnotic communication. This discussion is developed based on three main topics. The first is that of semiotic heterogeneity of communicative processes of hypnosis; the second consists of an articulation between the individual and the collective; and third, on the relation between the notions of ethos and sentiment. The paper concludes that in spite of conceptual difficulties the relationship between iconicity and complexity propitiate great contributions regarding important themes in hypnotic communication, such as subjectivity, the therapist’s experience, research, and belonging.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Arino, M. (2007). La subjectivité du chercheur en sciences
humaines. Paris: Harmattan.
Bergman, M. (2009). Peirce’s philosophy of communication. New
York: Continuum.
Bordron, J.-F. (2011). L’Iconicité et ses images. Paris: Puf.
Clément, C. (2011). L’appel de la transe. Paris: Stok.
Colapietro, V. (1989). Peirce’s approach to the self. New York: Suny.
Constantini, M. (2010). La sémiotique visuelle: nouveaux
paradigmes. Paris: Harmattan.
Cyrulnik, B. (2000). Les nourritures affectives. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Erickson, M. & Rossi, E. (1977). Hypnotic realities. New York:
Irvington.
Erickson, M., & Rossi, E. (1979). Hypnotherapy: an exploratory
casebook. New York: Irvington.
Erickson, M. (1992). Creative choice in hypnosis. New York, NY:
Irvington.
Gonzalez Rey, F. (2011). Subjetividade e saúde. São Paulo: Cortez.
Hancil, S. & Hirst, D. (2013). Prosody and iconicity. Amsterdan:
J. Benjamin Publishing.
Hiraga, M. (2005). Metaphor and iconicity. New York: Palgrave.
Jappy, T. (2010). Regards sur le poème muet. Perpignan: PUP.
Jappy, T. (2013). Introduction to peircean visual semiotics. New
York: Bloomsbury.
Jamieson, G. (2007). Hypnosis and conscious states. London:
Oxford University Press.
Jensen, M. & Patterson, D. (2014). Hypnotic approaches for chronic
pain management. American Psychologist, 2, 167 ”“ 177.
Jouvet, M. (2016). Le sommeil, la conscience et l’éveil. Paris:
Odile Jacob.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2008). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris:
Gallimard. (Original publicado em 1945).
Michaux, D. (2002). Hypnose, langage et communication. Paris:
Imago.
Midol, N. (2010). Écologie des transes. Paris: Teraedre.
Morin, E. (1991). Les idées. La méthode IV. Paris: Seuil.
Morin, E. (1996). A noção de sujeito. In D. Fried-Schnitman (org).
Novos paradigmas, cultura e subjetividade. (J. Rodrigues,
Trad). (pp. 45 ”“ 58). Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Morin, E. (2001). L’identité humaine. La méthode V. Paris: Seuil.
Morin, E. (2005). L’Éthique. La méthode VI. Paris: Seuil.
Muller, J. & Brent, J. (2000). Peirce, semiotics and psychoanalysis.
Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Nathan, T. (2004). Du commerce avec les diables. Paris: Synthélabo.
Nöth, W. (2015). The paradigms of iconicity in language and
literature. Em M. Hiraga (org). Iconicity: east meets west.
Amsterdan: John Benjamins.
Neubern, M. (2012). Drama como proposta de compreensão da
clínica de Milton Erickson. Interação em Psicologia, 16 (2),
307 ”“ 315.
Neubern, M. (2013a). Psicoterapia e espiritualidade. Belo
Horizonte: Diamante.
Neubern, M. (2013b). Hipnose, dores crônicas e técnicas de
ancoragem. A terapia de dentro para fora. Psicologia: Teoria
& Pesquisa, 29 (3), 297 ”“ 304.
Neubern, M. (2014). Subjetividade e complexidade na clínica
psicológica: superando dicotomias. Fractal, Revista de
Psicologia, (26), 3, 835 ”“ 852.
Peirce, C. (1989). Writings of Charles Peirce: A chronological
edition. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Rambelli, F. (2013). A buddhist theory of semiotics. London:
Bloomsbury.
Roustang, F. (2015). Jamais contre, d’abord. La présence d’un
corps. Paris : Odile Jacob.
Santaella, L. (2009). Matrizes da linguagem e do pensamento. São
Paulo: Fapesp/Iluminuras.
Schore, A. (2016). Affect regulation and the origin of the self. New
York: Routledge.
Short, T. (2007). Peirce’s theory of signs. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
humaines. Paris: Harmattan.
Bergman, M. (2009). Peirce’s philosophy of communication. New
York: Continuum.
Bordron, J.-F. (2011). L’Iconicité et ses images. Paris: Puf.
Clément, C. (2011). L’appel de la transe. Paris: Stok.
Colapietro, V. (1989). Peirce’s approach to the self. New York: Suny.
Constantini, M. (2010). La sémiotique visuelle: nouveaux
paradigmes. Paris: Harmattan.
Cyrulnik, B. (2000). Les nourritures affectives. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Erickson, M. & Rossi, E. (1977). Hypnotic realities. New York:
Irvington.
Erickson, M., & Rossi, E. (1979). Hypnotherapy: an exploratory
casebook. New York: Irvington.
Erickson, M. (1992). Creative choice in hypnosis. New York, NY:
Irvington.
Gonzalez Rey, F. (2011). Subjetividade e saúde. São Paulo: Cortez.
Hancil, S. & Hirst, D. (2013). Prosody and iconicity. Amsterdan:
J. Benjamin Publishing.
Hiraga, M. (2005). Metaphor and iconicity. New York: Palgrave.
Jappy, T. (2010). Regards sur le poème muet. Perpignan: PUP.
Jappy, T. (2013). Introduction to peircean visual semiotics. New
York: Bloomsbury.
Jamieson, G. (2007). Hypnosis and conscious states. London:
Oxford University Press.
Jensen, M. & Patterson, D. (2014). Hypnotic approaches for chronic
pain management. American Psychologist, 2, 167 ”“ 177.
Jouvet, M. (2016). Le sommeil, la conscience et l’éveil. Paris:
Odile Jacob.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2008). Phénoménologie de la perception. Paris:
Gallimard. (Original publicado em 1945).
Michaux, D. (2002). Hypnose, langage et communication. Paris:
Imago.
Midol, N. (2010). Écologie des transes. Paris: Teraedre.
Morin, E. (1991). Les idées. La méthode IV. Paris: Seuil.
Morin, E. (1996). A noção de sujeito. In D. Fried-Schnitman (org).
Novos paradigmas, cultura e subjetividade. (J. Rodrigues,
Trad). (pp. 45 ”“ 58). Porto Alegre: Artmed.
Morin, E. (2001). L’identité humaine. La méthode V. Paris: Seuil.
Morin, E. (2005). L’Éthique. La méthode VI. Paris: Seuil.
Muller, J. & Brent, J. (2000). Peirce, semiotics and psychoanalysis.
Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Nathan, T. (2004). Du commerce avec les diables. Paris: Synthélabo.
Nöth, W. (2015). The paradigms of iconicity in language and
literature. Em M. Hiraga (org). Iconicity: east meets west.
Amsterdan: John Benjamins.
Neubern, M. (2012). Drama como proposta de compreensão da
clínica de Milton Erickson. Interação em Psicologia, 16 (2),
307 ”“ 315.
Neubern, M. (2013a). Psicoterapia e espiritualidade. Belo
Horizonte: Diamante.
Neubern, M. (2013b). Hipnose, dores crônicas e técnicas de
ancoragem. A terapia de dentro para fora. Psicologia: Teoria
& Pesquisa, 29 (3), 297 ”“ 304.
Neubern, M. (2014). Subjetividade e complexidade na clínica
psicológica: superando dicotomias. Fractal, Revista de
Psicologia, (26), 3, 835 ”“ 852.
Peirce, C. (1989). Writings of Charles Peirce: A chronological
edition. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Rambelli, F. (2013). A buddhist theory of semiotics. London:
Bloomsbury.
Roustang, F. (2015). Jamais contre, d’abord. La présence d’un
corps. Paris : Odile Jacob.
Santaella, L. (2009). Matrizes da linguagem e do pensamento. São
Paulo: Fapesp/Iluminuras.
Schore, A. (2016). Affect regulation and the origin of the self. New
York: Routledge.
Short, T. (2007). Peirce’s theory of signs. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Downloads
Published
2017-05-23
How to Cite
Neubern, M. da S. (2017). Iconicity and Complexity in Hypnotic Communication. Psicologia: Teoria E Pesquisa, 32(5). Retrieved from https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/19457
Issue
Section
Artigos Teóricos
