Obligations Erga Omnes and International Public Order after the Decision in the Belgium v. Senegal Case

Autores

  • Marcel Ichiro Bastos Kamiyama Universidade de São Paulo

Palavras-chave:

Obligations erga omnes. International public order. Standing.

Resumo

This paper analyses the role of erga omnes obligations in contemporary Public International Law from the standpoint of relevant conventions and case-law. In this regard, the movement from bilateralism to community interest in the international legal system was confirmed by the International Court of Justice in its recent and emblematic case between Belgium and Senegal, in which the UN Convention against Torture was held to establish a public legal interest inter partes in the implementation of its provisions. Hence, the utility of the notion of erga omnes (partes) obligations with respect to standing before the Court was affirmed. It is sustained that, pursuant to this obiter dictum, international litigation on behalf of public interest is an irrevocable possibility, with the international judiciary, especially the International Court of Justice, playing an important part in the consolidation of the international legal public order.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

AMARAL JÚNIOR, Alberto do. Curso de Direito Internacional Público. São Pualo: Atlas, 3ª ed., 2012.

BIRNIE, Patrícia; BOYLE, Alan; REDGWELL, Catherine. International Law and the Environment. New York: Oxford University Press, 3 ed., 2009.

CANÇADO TRINDADE, Antônio Augusto. O Direito Internacional em um Mundo em Transformação. Rio de Janeiro: Renovar, 2001.

CARMODY, Chios. WTO Obligations as Collective. Ther European Journal of International Law, vol. 17, 2006.

CARVALHO RAMOS, André de. Processo Internacional de Direitos Humanos. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2 ed., 2012.

CASSESE, Antonio. Self-Determination of Peoples: A Legal Reappraisal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

__________. The International Court of Justice: It is High Time to Restyle the Respected Old Lady. In: Realizing Utopia: The Future of International Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012.

CRAWFORD, James. Brownlie's Principles of Public International Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 8 ed., 2012.

__________. State Responsibility: The General Part. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

DAILLIER, Patrick; FORTEAU, Mathias; PELLET, Alain. Droit International Public. Paris: L.G.D.J., 8ème ed., 2009.

GAZZINI, Tarcísio. The Legal Nature of WTO Obligations and the Consequences of their Violation. The European Journal of International Law, vol. 17, 2006.

GARDINER, Richard. Treaty Interpretation. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.

INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE. Reservations to the Convention on Genocide (Advisory Opinion) (1951). In: ICJ Reports 1951, 1951.

__________. South West Africa (Second Phase) (Ethiopia and Liberia v. South Africa) (1966). In: ICJ Reports 1966, 1966.

__________. Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Second Phase) (Belgium Spain) (1970). In: ICJ Reports 1970, 1970.

__________. Nuclear Tests Case (Request for the Indication of Interim Measures of Protection Submitted by the Government of New Zealand) (New Zealand) (New Zealand v. France) (1973). Available at: <http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/59/10731.pdf>.

__________.Nuclear Tests Case (Judgement) (New Zealand v. France) (1974). In: ICJ Reports 1974, 1974.

__________. East Timor (Portugal v. Australia (1995). In: ICJ Reports 1995, 1995.

__________. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the crime of Genocide (Preliminary Objections) (Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro) (1996). In: ICJ Reports 1996, 1996.

__________. Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion) (2004). In: ICJ Reports 2004, 2004a.

__________. Legal Consequences of the Construction of a Wall in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (Advisory Opinion) (Separate Opinion of Judge Higgins) (2004). In: ICJ Reports 2004, 2004b.

__________. Armed Activities on the Trritory of the congo (New Application: 2002) (Jurisdiction and Admissibility) (Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Rwanda) (2006). In: ICJ Reports 2006, 2006.

__________. Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal) (2012), avaible at <http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/144/17064.pdf> (last access: 21 january 2013), 2012a.

__________. Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal) (Dissenting Opinion of Judge Xue) (2012), avaible at <http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/144/17066.pdf> (last access: 21 january 2013), 2012b.

__________. Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. Senegal) (Separate Opinion of Judge Stotnikov) (2012), avaible at <http://www.icj-cij.org/docket/files/144/17070.pdf> (last access: 21 january 2013), 2012b.

INTERNATIONAL LAW COMISSION. Draft Articles on the Law of Treatis with Commentaries. Yearbook of the International Law Comission, vol. II, 1966.

__________. Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts, UN Doc. A/56/83, 2001a.

__________. Draft Articles on the Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts. Yearbook of the International Law Commission, vol. II (2), 2001b.

LEAGUE OF NATIONS. Report of the Internationaç entrusted by the Council of the League of Nations with the Task of giving and Advisory Opinion on the Legal Aspects of the Aaland Islands Question. In: LNOJ Special Supplement No. 3, 1920.

PAUWELYN, Joost. A typology of Multilateral Treaty Obligation: Are WTO Obligations Bilateral or Collective in Nature? The European Journal of International Law, vol. 14, 2003.

MEGRET, frédéric. Nature of Obligation. In: MOECKLI, Daniel; SHAH, Sangeeta; SIVAKUMARAN, Sandesh. International Human Rights Law. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

ORAKHELASHVILI, Alexander. Peremptory Norms in International Law. New York: Oxford Univesity Press, 2006.

PERMANENT COURT OF INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE. Case of the S.S. "Wimbledon" (Judgment) (United Kingdom, France, Italy and Japan v. Germany) (1923). In: PCIJ Ser. A, No. 1, 1923.

RAGAZZI, Mauricio. The Concept of International Obligations Erga Omnes. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

REZEK, Francisco. Direito Internacional Público: curso elementar. São Paulo: Saraiva, 13ª ed., 2011.

SICILIANOS, Linos-Alexander. "Countermeasures in Response to Grave violations of Obligations Owed to the International Community as a Whole". In: CRAWFORD, James; PELLET, Alain; OLLESON, Simon. The Law of International Responsibility. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.

SIMMA, Bruno. Does the UN Chartes Provide an Adequate Legal basis for individual ou Collective Responses to Violations of Obligations Erga Omnes? In: DELBRÜCK, Jost. The Future of International Law Enforcement. New Scenarios - New Law?. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, 1993.

__________. From Bilateralism to Community Interest in International Law. In: Recueil des cours de l'Académie de Droit International de la Haye, vol. 250, 2004.

STRAUSS, Andrew. Climate Change Litigation. Opening the Way to the International Court of justice. In: BURNS, William; OSOFSKY, Hari. Adjucating Climate Change: State, National and International Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

TAMS, Christian. Enforcing Obligations Erga Omnes in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.

UNITED NATIONS. Charter of the United Nations (1945). In: United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 1, 1945.

__________. General Assembly Resolution 174 (II) (1947), UN Doc. A/RES/174 (II) (Statute of the International Law Commission), 1947.

__________. General Assembly Resolution 1514 (XV) (1960), UN Doc. A/RES/1514 (II) (Declaration on the Granting of independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples), 1960.

__________. International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966). In: United Nation Treaty Series, vol. 993, 1966.

__________. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (1966). In: United Nation Treaty Series, vol. 999, 1966.

__________. Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969). In; United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 1.155, 1969.

__________. General Asssembly Resolution 2625 (XXV) (1970). UN Doc. A/5217 (Declaration on Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States in Accordance with the Charter of the UN), 1970.

__________. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (1984). In: United Nations Treaty Series, vol. 1.465, 1984.

UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE. General Comment 31: Nature of the General Legal Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the covenant, UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add. 13, 2004.

__________. Ivan Kitok v. Sweden (1988) (Communication No. 197/1985), UN Doc. CCPR/C/33/D/197/1985, 1988.

WORLD TRADE ORGANIZATION. US - Tax Treatment for 'Foreign Sales Corporation' (Article 22, paragraph 6 Panel Arbitration) (2002), WTO Doc. WT/DS108/ARB, 2002

Downloads

Publicado

14-01-2014

Como Citar

KAMIYAMA, Marcel Ichiro Bastos. Obligations Erga Omnes and International Public Order after the Decision in the Belgium v. Senegal Case. Revista dos Estudantes de Direito da Universidade de Brasília, [S. l.], v. 11, n. 1, p. 43–62, 2014. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/redunb/article/view/20247. Acesso em: 24 nov. 2024.