Types of governance multi-level and the intelligence of the regulation of the sanitation sector in Brasil
A new premisse of the fluidity of the regulatory competence as an instrument of sectorial governance
Keywords:
Sanitation. New Legal Framework. Smart regulatory governance. Types of multi-level governance. Fluid regulatory design.Abstract
[Purpose] Considering the new legal framework for sanitation in Brazil, this article presents an expanded and innovative field for the performance of regulatory governance which, on one hand, has the need to innovate to improve the current system and lead it to achievement of its goals and, on the other hand, relies on the so-called “undefined and overlapping” of competences added to the problem of regulatory capture.
[Methodology/approach/design] With this endeavor, it will address the findings made by political scientists Liesbet Hooghe and Gary Marks in 2001 on types of multi-level governance. They will be brought into the context of sanitation in Brazil by identifying and defining Types I and II.
[Findings] This article suggests an intelligent regulation that allows the elaboration of flexible, adaptable, and sometimes fluid regulatory designs for the sector, which are added to the various mechanisms used so far in the regulation of sanitation in Brazil.
Downloads
References
ANTUNES & D’OLIVEIRA. Paulo de Bessa e Rafael Daudt. Breves Considerações sobre o Marco regulatório do Saneamento Básico – Lei n° 14.026, de 15 de julho de 2020. http://genjuridico.com.br/2020/07/23/marco-regulatorio-saneamento-basico/. Acesso em: 23.07.2020.
ASHELY C. Brown et al. Handbook for Evaluating Infrastructure Regulatory Systems. The World Bank, Washington- DC, 2006.
BATLHEY, Richard. 1991. Comparisons and Lessons. In Local Government in Europe. Trends and Developments, edited by Richard Batley and Gerry Stoker. London: MacMillan, 210-230.
DUTRA, Joisa; MOREIRA, Egon & LOUREIRO, Gustavo Kaercher. Competência e a governança do setor de saneamento: quem faz o quê?. Fundação Getúlio Vargas: abril, 2021.
FREY, Bruno, and EICHENBERGER, Reiner. The New Democratic Federalism for Europe. Functional, Overlapping, and Competing Jurisdictions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 1999.
HABERMAS. Jürgen. Direito e Democracia. Tradução Flávio Beno Siebeneichler – UGF. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 2ª ed., 2012, vol I e II.
HOOGHE, Lisbet, MARKS, Gary .Types of multi-level governance. 2001. European Integration Online Papers (EIoP). Vol. V (2001). N° 11; http: //eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2001-011a.htm. Acesso em 24.06.2021.
HOOGHE, Lisbet, MARKS, Gary. Unravelling the Central State, but how? Types of Multi-level Governance. American Political Science Review, vol.97, n.2, p.233-243, maio, 2003.
KEOHANE, Robert O. and OSTROM, Elinor, eds. 1995. Local Commons and Global Interdependence. Heterogeneity and Cooperation in Two Domains. London: Sage.
MCGiNNIS, Michael D. ed. 1999a. Polycentric Governance and Development. Readings from the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
NICOLAIDIS, Kalypso. 2001. Conclusion: The Federal Vision Beyond the State. In The Federal Vision: Legitimacy and Levels of Governance in the United States and the European Union, edited by Kalypso Nicolaidis and Robert Howse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 442-470.
OSTROM, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
PEREZ, marcos Augusto; SOUZA, Rodrigo Pagani de; TOJAL, Sebastião Boto de Barros; FILHO, Alexandre Jorge Carneiro da Cunha. Desafios da Nova Regulação do Saneamento Básico. Quartier, 2021.
ROSENAU, James N. 1997. Along the Domestic- Foreign Frontier. Exploring Governance in a Turbulent World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ROSENAU, James N. 2001. Strong Demand, Huge Supply: Governance in an Emerging Epoch. Paper prepared for the Conference on Multi-Level Governance: Interdisciplinary Perspectives, sponsored by the Political Economy Center of the University of Sheffield.
STIGLITZ, Joseph. O preço da desigualdade. Tradução de Dinis Pires. Lisboa: Bertrand, 2013.
_______________. Rewriting the rules of the American Economy. An agenda for growth and shared prosperity. New York: WW Norton &o Company, 2016.
TEUBNER. Gunther. After legal instrumentalism: Strategic models of post-regulatory law. In: Dilemmas of law in the welfare state. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1986.
_________________. Direito, Sistema e policontextualidade. Piracicaba: Unimep, 2005.
_________________. Fragmentos constitucionais: constitucionalismo social na globalização. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Law and Regulation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting this paper to the Journal of Law and Regulation, I hereby declare that I agree to the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0), available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.
