Discurso, Política Educativa y Tecnología
la construcción escalar de la identidad
Mots-clés :
tecnología. identidad. análisis escalar. política educativa.Résumé
Plan Ceibal es una política social, tecnológica y educativa que promueve el uso de tecnología en las aulas uruguayas. En tanto texto (Ball 2006), busca democratizar el acceso a la tecnología para borrar diferencias socioeconómicas. Sin embargo, en tanto práctica (Mortimer y Wortham 2015), su implementación produce significados (algunos de ellos “inesperados” desde el punto de vista oficial) que pueden eventualmente (re)construir asimetrías en las identidades de los estudiantes. Esta investigación ”“de corte etnográfico- discursiva y socio-semiótica”“ explora a través del análisis escalar cómo se (re)construye la identidad de un grupo de estudiantes en el marco de esta política. El análisis de diversas escalas espacio-temporales co-implicadas deja en evidencia que, a través de sus posicionamientos ideológicos, diversos actores sociales construyen la identidad de estos estudiantes y su salón de clase de manera tal que, a la vez, se los puede representar ”“casi paradójicamente”“ en un estado de déficit (lingüístico) y de ventaja (curricular).
Téléchargements
Références
Agar, M. 2006. An Ethnography by Any Other Name... Forum: Qualitative Social Research 7, 4: n/p.
Bakhtin, M. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays by M.M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Ball, S. J. 2006. Education Policy and Social Class. Londres/Nueva York: Routledge.
Bamberg, M., De Fina, A. y Schiffrin, D. 2011. Discourse and identity construction. En S. J. Schwartz y V.L. Vignoles (Eds.). Handbook of identity theory and research, pp. 177-199. Nueva York: Springer.
Bezemer, J. y Kress, G. 2016. Multimodality, Learning and Communication. A social semiotic framework. Londres/Nueva York: Routledge.
Bezemer, J. y Jewitt, C. 2010. Multimodal Analysis: Key Issues. En L. Litosseliti (Ed.). Research Methods in Linguistics, pp. 180-197. Londres: Continuum.
Blommaert, J. 2007. Sociolinguistic Scales. Intercultural Pragmatics 4, 1: 1-19.
Blommaert, J. 2015. Meaning as a non-linear effect. The birth of cool. AILA Review 28: 7-27.
Blommaert, J., Westinene, E. y Leppänen, S. 2015. Further notes on sociolinguistic scales. Intercultural Pragmatics 12, 1: 119-127.
Canagarajah, S. y De Costa, P.I. 2016. Introduction: Scale analysis, and its uses and prospects in educational linguistics. Linguistics and Education 34: 1-10.
Canale, G. 2014. Adquisición de la fonología. El inglés como lengua extranjera en estudiantes montevideanos. Montevideo: Comisión Sectorial de Investigación Científica. Universidad de la República.
Canale, G. 2019. Technology, Multimodality and Learning. Analyzing meaning across scales. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Carr, S.E. y Lempert, M. 2016. Introduction: The pragmatics of scale. En E.S. Carr y M. Lempert (Eds.). Scale. Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life, pp. 1-24. Oakland: University of California Press.
Clark, J. n/d. OLPC and the US: The Factors Design for Development. Stanford University, pp. 1-14.
Cook, G. 1992. The discourse of advertising. Londres / Nueva York: Routledge.
Coronado, G. y Hodge, B. 2017. [Disponible en: https://www.westernsydney.edu.au/ics/people/researchers/bob_hodge]. Metodologías semióticas para análisis de la complejidad. [Consulta: 25 de mayo de 2018].
Deleuze, G. y Guattari, F. 1987. A thousand plateaus. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dicks, B., Bambo S. y Coffey, A. 2006. Multimodal Ethnography. Qualitative Research 6, 1: 77-96.
Dicks, B., Flewitt, R., Lancaster, L. y Pahl, K. 2011. Multimodality and Ethnography: working at the intersection. Qualitative Research 11, 3: 227-237.
Fairclough, N. 1989. Language and Power. Londres: Longman.
Gal, S. 2016. Scale-Making: Comparison and Perspective as Ideological Projects. En E.S. Carr y M. Lempert (Eds.). Scale. Discourse and Dimensions of Social Life, pp. 91-111. Oakland: University of California Press.
Hepp, P., Hinostroza, E. y Laval, E. 2004. A systemic approach to educational renewal with new technologies. En A. Brown y N. Davis (Eds.). In Digital Technology, Communities & Education, pp. 299-311. Nueva York: Routledge Falmer.
Hodge, B. 2017. Social Semiotics for a Complex World. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hornberger, N. H. y Johnson, D.C. 2007. Slicing the Onion Ethnographically. Layers and Spaces in Multilingual Language Education Policy and Practice. TESOL Quarterly 41, 3: 509-532.
Hult, F. M. 2010a. Analysis of language policy discourses across the scales of space and time. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 202: 7-24.
Hult, F.M. 2010b. The complexity turn in educational linguistics. Language, Culture and Curriculum 23, 3: 173-177.
Hult, F.M. 2015. Making Policy Connections across Scales Using Nexus Analysis. En F.M. Hult y D. Cassels Johnson (Eds.). Research Methods in Language Policy: A Practical Guide, pp. 217-231. Malden: Wiley.
Iedema, R. y Caldas-Coulthard, C. 2008.Introduction En C. Caldas-Coulthard y R. Iedema (Eds.). Identity Trouble: Critical Discourse and Contested Identity, pp. 1-13. Nueva York: Palgrave.
Johnson, D.C. 2009. Ethnography of Language Policy. Language Policy 8, 2: 139-159.
Johnson, D.C. 2013. Language policy. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Kaiser, D.J. 2017. English Language Teaching in Uruguay. World Englishes 36, 4: 744-759.
Knoblauch, H. 2005. Focused Ethnography. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 6, 3: s/p.
Kress, G. 2011. ‘Partnership in Research’: multimodality and ethnography. Qualitative Research 11, 3: 239-260.
Kress, G. 2015. Designing Meaning. Social Semiotic Multimodality Seen in Relation to Ethnographic Research. En S. Bollig, M.S. Honig, S. Nemann y C. Seele (Eds.). MultiPluriTrans in Educational Ethnography. Approaching the Multimodality, Plurality and Translocality of Educational Realities, pp. 213-233. Verlag: Transcript.
Krzyzanowski, M. y Wodak, R. 2008. Multiple Identities, Migration and Belonging: ‘Voices of Migrants’ En C.R. Caldas-Coulthard y R. Iedema (Eds.). Identity Trouble. Critical Discourse and Contested Identity, pp. 95-119. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lemke, J. 2001. Discursive Technologies and Social Organization of Meaning. Folia Linguistica 35, 1/2: 79-96.
Lemke, J. 2009. Multimodality, identity, and time. En C. Jewitt (Ed.). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis, pp. 140-150. Nueva York: Routledge.
McCarty, T. 2011. Introducing Ethnography and Language Policy. En T. McCarty (Ed.). Ethnography and language policy, pp. 1-28. Nueva York/Londres: Routledge.
Macgilchrist, F. y Van Hout, T. 2011. Ethnographic Discourse Analysis and Social Science. Forum: Qualitative Social Research 12, 1: n/p
Martin, J.R. 2008. Intermodal Reconciliation: Mates in Arms. En L. Unsworth (Ed.). New Literacies and the English Curriculum. Multimodal Perspectives, pp. 112-148. Londres: Curriculum.
Menken, K. y García, O. (Eds.). 2010. Negotiating language policies in schools. Educators as policymakers. Nueva York/Londres: Routledge.
Moorman, M. y Neijens, P.C. 2012. Political advertising. En S.L. Rogers y E.L. Thorson (Eds.). Advertising theory, pp. 297-310. Nueva York: Routledge.
Mortimer, K. y Wortham, S. 2015. Analyzing Language Policy and Social Identification Across Heterogeneous Scales. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 35: 160-172.
Norton, B. 2009. Identity and Language Learning. Extending the conversation. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Peräkylä, A. 2004. Reliability and validity in research based on naturally occurring social interaction. En D. Silverman (Ed.). Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice, pp. 283-304. Londres: Sage.
Pischetola, M. 2014. Teaching with Laptops: A Critical Assessment of One-to-one Technologies. En M. Stocchetti (Ed.). Media and Education in the Digital Age. Concepts, Assessments, Subversions, pp. 203-214. Frankurt: Peter Lang.
Resumen Ejecutivo. 2009. Montevideo: Plan Ceibal.
Savsky, K. 2016. State Language Policy in Time and Space: Meaning, Transformation, Recontextualisation. En E. Barakos y J.W. Unger (Eds). Discursive Approaches to Language Policy, pp. 51-70. Londres: Palgrave Macmillan.
Scollon, R. y Scollon, S.W. 2004. Nexus Analysis. Discourse and the emerging Internet. Londres y Nueva York: Routledge.
Vaillant, D. 2015. Uruguay: The Teacher’s Policies Black Box. En S. Schwartzman (Ed.). Education in South America, pp. 405-421. Londres: Bloomsbury.
Van Dijk, T.A. 1996. Análisis del discurso ideológico. Comunicación y Política 15-43.
Van Leeuwen, T. 2008. Discourse and Practice. New tools for critical discourse analysis. Nueva York: Oxford.
Walford, G. 2002. When policies move fast, how long can ethnography take? En B.A.U. Levinson, S.L. Cade, A. Padawer y A.P. Elvir. Ethnography and Education Policy Across the Americas, pp. 23-38. Londres: Praeger.
Wodak, R. 2001. The Discourse ”“ Historical Approach. En R. Wodak y M. Meyer (Eds.). Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Londres: Sage.
Wodak, R. y Fairclough, N. 2010. Recontextualizing European higher education policies: the case of Austria and Romania. Critical Discourse Studies 7, 1: 19-40.
Wortham, S. y Rhodes, C.R. 2012. The Production of Relevant Scales: Social Identification of Migrants During Rapid Demographic Change in One American Town. Applied Linguistics Review 3, 1: 75-99.
Zheng, B., Warschauer, M., Lin, C. y Chang, C. 2016. Learning in One-to-One Laptop Environments: A Meta Analysis and Research Synthesis. Review of Educational Research 86, 4: 1052-1084.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Los/as autores/as conservan los derechos de autor/a y garantizan a RALED el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution License BY-NC-ND 4.0 que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo, copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato.
Os/As autores/as conservam os direitos autorais e garantem a RALED o direito de ser a primeira publicação do trabalho licenciado por uma Creative Commons Attribution License BY-NC-ND 4.0 que permite compartilhar o trabalho com reconhecimento de sua autoria e cópia e redistribuição do material em qualquer meio ou formato.
