90 years of solitude

the absence of Latin American sensibilities in the debate on architectural autonomy

Auteurs-es

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.18830/1679-09442024v17e47929

Mots-clés :

Cultural solitude, Urban solitude, Latin American solitude, Culturally blind architectural criticism, Architectural autonomy, Urban autonomy

Résumé

This paper shifts its attention from “South-South” relations to the absence of “South-South” relations in a culturally blind chapter of architectural criticism. It focuses on the postwar debate on architectural autonomy whose disciplinary reduction, especially in the United States, prevented an urban interpretation of a culturally sensitive autonomy. The paper argues that the dogmatic architectural criticism of the twentieth century and the post-critical discourse of the twenty-first century have failed to recognize that critical sensibilities other than Eurocentric and North American approaches exist in other regions such as Latin America. The paper is structured in four phases: a brief history of architectural autonomy; its disciplinary reduction; its overlooked cultural dimension; and its urban potential. The goal is to highlight the cultural blindness of critical and post-critical architectural discourses through a theory sensitive to cultural and urban solitudes based on a revision of the interdisciplinary interpretations of the term autonomy.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Biographie de l'auteur-e

Miguel Lopez Melendez, Harvard University; Graduate School of Design; Department of Architecture.

Miguel’s research combines architecture, art, aesthetics, landscape architecture, philosophy, and urbanism. His research and teaching activities at Harvard University Graduate School of Design (GSD) comprised architecture and urban projects in Latin America, the Caribbean, and the United States, as well as courses on history and theory of architecture and landscape architecture. He has participated in international conferences in Latin America, North America, Europe, and Asia, while his work has been exhibited internationally in the United States and China. Miguel holds a Doctor of Design degree and a Master of Architecture in Urban Design from Harvard University GSD, a certificate in Design of Sustainable Communities from Universidad Iberoamericana (Mexico), and a Bachelor of Architecture from Tecnológico de Monterrey (ITESM, Mexico) and Universidad CEU San Pablo (Madrid, Spain).

Références

ADORNO, Theodor W. Kant’s ‘Critique of pure reason’. [1959]. Edited by Rolf Tiedemann. Translated by Rodney Livingstone. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2001.

AGREST, Diana. Design vs non-design. In: HAYS, K. Michael (ed.). Architecture theory since 1968. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1998. p. 200-213.

ANDERSON, Stanford. Critical conventionalism in architecture. Assemblage, Cambridge, n. 1, p. 7-23, 1986.

ANTONIONI, Michelangelo. The event and the image. In: ANTONIONI, Michelangelo. The architecture of vision: writings and interviews on cinema. Edited by Carlo di Carlo and Giorgio Tinazzi. American edition by Marga Cottino-Jones. New York: Marsilio Publishers, 1996. p. 51-53.

ARENDT, Hannah. The human condition. 2. ed. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press, 1998.

AURELI, Pier Vittorio. The project of autonomy: politics and architecture within and against capitalism, New York: Temple Hoyne Buell Center for the Study of American Architecture; Princeton Architectural Press, 2008.

AURELI, Pier Vittorio. The possibility of an absolute architecture. Cambridge, Mass.; London: The MIT Press, 2011.

BAIRD, George. “Criticality” and its discontents. Harvard Design Magazine, Cambridge, n. 21, 2004.

BELLO, Andrés. Autonomía cultural de América. Santiago de Chile: [s.n.]: 1848.

BENJAMIN, Walter. The work of art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. New York: Prism Key Press, 2010.

CASTORIADIS, Cornelius. The retreat from autonomy: post-modernism as generalized conformism. Thesis Eleven, v. 31, n. 1, p. 14-23, 1992.

CEPAL (Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe). Press release on the poverty exacerbated by the pandemic (Pandemia provoca aumento en los niveles de pobreza sin precedentes en las últimas décadas e impacta fuertemente en la desigualdad y el empleo). [S.l.]: 2021: https://www.cepal.org/es/comunicados/pandemia-provoca-aumento-niveles-pobreza-sin-precedentes-ultimas-decadas-impacta. [Accessed 16 February 2024].

CLARKE, Paul Barry. Autonomy unbound. Alershot; Brookfield, USA: Ashgate, 1999.

DAMISCH, Hubert. Ledoux and Kant. Translated by Erin Williams. Perspecta, Cambridge, n. 33, p. 10-15, 2002.

FOUCAULT, Michel. The order of things. London, New York: Routledge Classics, 2005.

FRAMPTON, Kenneth. Reflections on the autonomy of architecture. In: GHIRARDO, Diane Yvonne (ed.). Out of site: a social criticism of architecture. Seattle: Bay Press, 1991.

HAYS, K. Michael. Critical architecture: between culture and form. Perspecta, Cambridge, n. 21, p. 14-29, 1984.

HAYS, K. Michael (ed.). Architecture theory since 1968. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1998.

KANT, Immanuel. Critique of practical reason. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, Kindle edition, 2015. [Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy].

KAUFMANN, Emil. Architecture in the Age of Reason: Baroque and Postbaroque in England, Italy, and France. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1955.

KAUFMANN, Emil. De Ledoux a Le Corbusier: origen y desarrollo de la arquitectura autónoma. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili, 1982.

KAUFMANN, Emil. Von Ledoux bis Le Corbusier: ursprung und entwicklung der autonomen Architektur. Stuttgart: G. Hatje, 1985.

MOUFFE, Chantal. Agonistics: thinking the world politically. London: Verso Book, Kindle Edition, 2013.

MURENA, Héctor A. El pecado original de América. Buenos Aires: Sur, 1954.

NIETZSCHE, Friedrich. Beyond good and evil. United Kingdon, New York: Cambridge University Press, Kindle Edition, 2002. [Cambridge Texts in the History of Philosophy].

OED Online (Oxford English Dictionary Online). Autonomy, n,. [S.l.]: Oxford University Press, accessed March 24, 2021, https://www-oed-com.ezpprod1.hul.harvard.edu/view/Entry/13500?redirectedFrom=autonomy

O'GORMAN, Edmundo. La invención de América: el universalismo de la cultura de occidente. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1958.

PAZ, Octavio. Interview with Octavio Paz by Joaquín Soler Serrano, “A Fondo” RTVE (1977). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toyjckYF65w&t=30s

PAZ, Octavio. El laberinto de la soledad: postdata, vuelta al laberinto de la soledad. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1981.

PAZ, Octavio. Interview with Octavio Paz by Nathan Gardels. West Turns East at the End of History. New Perspectives Quarterly, v. 26, n. 4, 2009.

ROSSI, Aldo. The architecture of the city. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1982.

SCHMITT, Carl. The concept of the political. [exp. edition]. Translated by George Schwab. Chicago; London: The University of Chicago Press: 2007.

SOMOL, Robert; WHITING, Sarah. Notes around the Doppler Effect and other moods of Modernism. Perspecta, Cambridge, n. 33, p. 72–77, 2002.

TAFURI, Manfredo. Architecture and utopia: design and capitalist development. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1976.

TAFURI, Manfredo. Theories and history of architecture. New York: Harper & Row, 1980. [Icon Editions].

VIDLER, Anthony. The Ledoux Effect: Emil Kaufmann and the claims of Kantian autonomy. Perspecta, Cambridge, n. 33, p. 16-29, 2002.

ZEA, Leopoldo. América en la historia. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1957.

ZEA, Leopoldo. The Latin-American mind. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press, 1963.

Téléchargements

Publié-e

2024-04-01

Comment citer

Lopez Melendez, M. (2024). 90 years of solitude: the absence of Latin American sensibilities in the debate on architectural autonomy. Paranoá, 17, e47929. https://doi.org/10.18830/1679-09442024v17e47929

Numéro

Rubrique

Paisagens de Poder: Projeto, Arquitetura e Urbanismo em Cidades Capitais