On the Limitations of the Trolley Problem for Evaluating the Risks Imposed by Autonomous Vehicles

Authors

  • Renato Rodrigues Kinouchi Universidade Federal do ABC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v6i2.22105

Keywords:

trolley problem, probability, risk, values, autonomous vehicles

Abstract

In this paper I discuss the adequacy of the trolley problem original version for the issue of autonomous vehicles accidents. The main criticism concerns the impossibility of including aspects related to risks and uncertainties involved in such accidents. Next, I present an abstract model which satisfies the conceptual requirements of the standard notion of risk and which will take the form of a probabilistic trolley problem. By way of two examples, I defend that this new model is more adequate to evaluate the risks imposed by autonomous vehicles. Although not intending to solve the problem, I try to clarify how such vehicles may impose distinct risks to pedestrians and passengers, an ethical question that the original version of the trolley problem has overlooked.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Renato Rodrigues Kinouchi, Universidade Federal do ABC

Bacharel em Psicologia e Psicólogo pela Universidade Federal de São Carlos (1999). Doutor em Filosofia também pela Universidade Federal de São Carlos (2004). Pós-doutorado em Filosofia da Ciência pela Universidade de São Paulo (2006). Pesquisador visitante no Instituto de Ciências Sociais da Universidade de Lisboa (2012). Atualmente é professor adjunto da Universidade Federal do ABC (desde 2006). Tem experiência nas áreas de Filosofia da Ciência, Epistemologia e Ensino de Ciências. Dentre os temas de pesquisa, incluem-se: ciência e valores, pragmatismo, filosofia e história da psicologia, viéses cogntivos.

References

BONNEFON, J-F.; SHARIFF, A.; RAHWAN, I. The social dilemma of autonomous vehicles. Science, 352 (6293), p. 1573-1576, 2016.

BRUERS, S.; BRAEKCMAN, J. A review and systematization of the Trolley Problem. Philosophia, 42, p. 251-269, 2014.

CASEY, B. Amoral machines, or: How roboticists can learn to stop worrying and love the law. Northwestern University Law Review, 111,
p. 1347, 2017.

DENG, B. The robot’s dilemma. Nature, 523 (7558), p. 24-25, 2015.

EVANS, L. Death in traffic: Why are the ethical issues ignored? Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology, 2 (1), 2008. Disponível em:
https://doi.org/10.2202/1941-6008.1014. Acessado em 30 de agosto de 2018.

FOOT, P. The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect. Oxford Review, 5, p. 5-15, 1967.

GOODALL, N. J. Machine ethics and automated vehicles. In: G. Meyer and S. Beiker (Eds), Road vehicle automation. Dordrecht: Springer, p. 93-10, 2014.

_____. Away from Trolley Problems and towards risk management. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 30 (8), p. 810-821, 2016.

HANSSON, S. O. Philosophical perspectives on risk. Techné, 8 (1), p. 10-35, 2004.

_____. The epistemology of technological risk. Techné, 9 (2), p. 68-80, 2005.

_____. Technology, prosperity and risk. In: J. K. B. Olsen, S. A. Pedersen and V. F. Hendricks (Eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.

_____. A panorama of the philosophy of risk. In: S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin and M. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of Risk Theory: Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics, and Social Implications of Risk, p. 27-54. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.

_____. The ethics of risk: Ethical analysis in an uncertain world. New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2013.

KOCKELMAN, K. M.; KWEN, Y-J. Driver injury severity: An application of ordered probit models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 34 (3), p. 313-321, 2002.

LEBEN, D. A Rawlsian algorithm for autonomous vehicles. Ethics and Information Technology, 19 (2), p. 107-115, 2017.

LIN, P. Why ethics matters for autonomous cars. In: J. Markus et al, Autonomes fahren, p. 69-85. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer, 2015.

MÖLLER, N. The concepts of risk and safety. In: S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, P. Sandin and M. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of Risk Theory: Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics, and Social Implications of Risk, p. 55-85. Dordrecht: Springer, 2012.

NYHOLM, S. & SMIDS, J. The ethics of accident-algorithms for selfdriving cars: an applied trolley problem? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 19 (5), p. 1275-1289, 2016.

O´DONNELL, C. J. & CONNOR, D. H. Predicting severity of motor vehicle accident injuries using models of ordered multiple choice. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 28 (6), p. 739-753, 1996.

SHARIFF, A., BONNEFON, J-F., RAHWAN, I. Psychological roadblocks to the adoption of self-driving vehicles. Nature Human Behaviour, 1 (10), p. 694-696, 2017.

THOMSON, J. J. Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. The Monist, 59, p. 204-217, 1976.

_____. The trolley problem. The Yale Law Journal, 94 , p. 1395-1415, 1985.

_____. Turning the trolley. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 36 (4), p. 359-374, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2018-12-28

How to Cite

KINOUCHI, Renato Rodrigues. On the Limitations of the Trolley Problem for Evaluating the Risks Imposed by Autonomous Vehicles. Journal of Modern and Contemporary Philosophy, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 115–130, 2018. DOI: 10.26512/rfmc.v6i2.22105. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/fmc/article/view/22105. Acesso em: 28 dec. 2024.

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 2 (2018): Dossiê "Colóquio UnB-USP de Lógica e Filosofia da Lógica"

Section

Articles

License

Copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution, in educational and other non-commercial settings.