Development in Latin America: political economies as a matter of culture

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202237030008

Keywords:

varieties of development; cultural theory; wicked problems; clumsy solutions; development governance

Abstract

The growing unrest regarding the social, political, economic and environmental state of affairs, both in the global South and North, suggests a deep challenge of the development model. Ideas about development matter because they seek to bring about social states by solving social ills. Therefore, development has traditionally been a solution to problems. However, its definition is being increasingly disputed. So, it has become a problem as well, a wicked one, requiring clumsy solutions. This article makes sense of that plurality and proposes a way to harness it. Applying grid group cultural theory to this debate produces four irreducible ideal-typical worldviews and notions of development: market-led individual prosperity, state-led system-wide welfare, alternatives of community-led equal welfare with ecological conservation, and a mirage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pablo Garcés-Velástegui, Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales of Ecuador.

Dean of the School of International Relations at the Instituto de Altos Estudios Nacionales of Ecuador (IAEN).

References

ACOSTA, Alberto. Buen vivir sumak kawsay: una oportunidad para imaginar nuevos mundos. Quito: Abya Yala, 2012.

______. El buen vivir en el camino del post-desarrollo Una lectura desde la Constitución de Montecristi, Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. Policy Paper 9, 2010.

-ALTMAN, Yochanan; BARUCH, Yehuda. Cultural theory and organizations: analytical method and cases. Organization Studies, v. 19, n. 1, p. 769-785, 1998.

BELL, Wendy. An anthropological view of how organizations think. Monash University Faculty of Business and Economics, Working Paper 16/97, 1997.

BOAS, Taylor; GANS-MORSE, Jordan. Neoliberalism: from new liberal philosophy to anti-liberal slogan. Studies in Comparative International Development , v. 44, p. 137-161, 2009.

CHAMBERS, Robert. Ideas for development. IDS working paper 238. Sussex, UK: IDS, 2004.

CHANG, Ha-Joon. Bad Samaritans. New York: Bloomsbury, 2008.

______. Kicking away the ladder. London: Anthem, 2003.

CHANG, Ha-Joon; GRABEL, Ilene. Reclaiming development: an alternative economic policy manual. London: Zed Books, 2004.

COYLE, Dennis. The theory that would be king. In: COYLE, Dennis; ELLIS, Richard (Eds.). Politics, policy, and culture, p. 219-239. Boulder, CL: Westview Press, 1994.

DOS SANTOS, Theotonio. The crisis of development theory and the problem of dependence in Latin America. In: BERNSTEIN, Henry (Rd.). Underdevelopment and development: the third world today, p. 57-80. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books, 1973.

DOUGLAS Mary. Thought styles: critical essays on good taste. London: Sage, 1996.

______. Risk and blame: essays in cultural theory. London: Routledge, 1992a.

______. Governability: a question of culture. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v. 22, n. 3, p. 463-481, 1992b.

______. In the acting voice. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1982.

DOUGLAS, Mary; NEY, Steven. Missing persons, a critique of personhood in the social sciences. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1998

ESCOBAR Arturo. “Post-development” as a concept and social practice. In: ZIAI, Aram (Ed.). Exploring post-development: theory and practice, problems and perspectives, p. 18-32. London: Routledge, 2007.

______. Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the Third World.Princeton, MA: Princeton University Press, 1995.

FREEDEN, Michael. Ideologies and political theory: a conceptual approach. Clarendon,UK: Oxford University Press, 1996.

FRITZ, Verena; ROCHA, Alina. Developmental States in the New Millennium: concepts and challenges for a new aid agenda. Development Policy Review, v. 25, n. 5, p. 531-552, 2007.

FURTADO, Celso. Teoría y política del desarrollo económico. Mexico: Siglo Veintiuno Editores, 1974.

GARCÉS-VELÁSTEGUI, Pablo. Varieties of development: on the plurality of development models and how to harness it. forthcoming.

______. Using the capability approach and fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis in development policy evaluation. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, v. 24, n. 2, p. 179-197, 2022.

______. Of ends and means: development policy assessment with human development and multiple causality. Revista Desarrollo y Sociedad, v. 83, p. 385-412, 2019.

______. Humanizing development: tacking stock of Amartya Sen’s capability approach. Problemas del Desarrollo, v. 51, n. 203, p. 191-212, 2016.

GUDYNAS, Eduardo. Buen vivir: today’s tomorrow. Development, v. 54, n. 4, p. 441-447, 2011.

HOOD, Christopher. The art of the State: culture, rhetoric and public management. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 1998

HOPPE, Robert. Applied cultural theory: tool for policy analysis. In: FISCHER, Frank; MILLER, Gerald; SIDNEY, Mara (Eds.). Handbook of Public Policy Analysis, p. 289-308. London: CRC Press, 2007.

HOPPE, Rob; PETERSE, Aat. Handling frozen fire. Political culture and risk management. Boulder, CL: Westview Press, 1993

KAY, Cristobal. Latin American theories of development and underdevelopment. New York: Routledge, 2011.

KÄSLER, Dirk. Max Weber: an Introduction to his life and work. Oxford,U: Polity Press. 1988.

LOCKHART, Charles. The social construction of cooperation: egalitarian, hierarchical, and individualistic faces of altruism. In: SUN-KI, Chai; SWEDLOW, Brendon (Eds.). Culture and social theory / Aaron Wildavsky, p. 113-131. London: Transaction Publishers, 1998.

MAMADOUH, Virginie. Grid-group cultural theory: an introduction. GeoJournal, v. 47, p. 395-409, 1999.

MCGILLIVRAY, Mark. Human well-being: issues, concepts and measures. In: MCGILLIVRAY, Mark (Ed.). Human well-being: concept and measurement, p. 1-22. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

MENA, Ángela; MENESES, Yeison. La filosofía de vivir sabroso. Revista Universidad de Antioquia, v. 337, p. 50-53, 2019.

MUGUMBATE, Jacob; NYANGURU, Andrew. Exploring African philosophy: the value of Ubuntu in social work. African Journal of Social Work, v. 3, n. 1, p. 82-100, 2013.

ONG, Aihwa. Neoliberalism as exception: mutations in citizenship and sovereignty. Durham, UK: Duke University Press, 2006.

PEET, Richard; HARTWICK, Elaine. Theories of development: contentions, arguments, alternatives. 2. ed. New York: The Guildford Press, 2009.

PIERRI, Naina. Historia del concepto de desarrollo sustentable. In: FOLADORI, Guillermo; PIERRI, Naína (Eds.). ¿Sustentabilidad? Desacuerdos sobre el desarrollo sustentable, p. 27-81. Mexico: Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas-Porrúa, 2000.

PREBISCH, Raúl. El desarrollo económico de la America Latina y algunos de sus principales problemas. El Trimestre Económico, v. 16, n. 63, p. 347-431, 1949.

RAHNEMA, Majid. Towards post-development: searching for signposts, a new language and new paradigms. In: RAHNEMA, Majid; BAWTREE, Victoria (Eds.). The post-development reader, p. 377-403. London: Zed Books, 1997.

RAMOSE, Mogobe. Ubuntu. In: KALLIS, Giorgos (Ed.). Degrowth. A vocabulary for a new era, p. 212-214. New York: Routledge, 2015

______. An African perspective on justice and race. Polylog: Forum for Intercultural Philosophy 3, p. 1-27, 2001.

RIETHOF, Marieke. Labour involvement in national and regional transformation processes: the case of Chile. Third World Quarterly, v. 20, n. 5, p. 1049-1058, 1999.

RITTEL, Horst; WEBER, Melvin. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, v. 4, n. 2, p. 155-169, 1973.

ROSTOW, W. W. The stages of economic growth: a non-communist manifesto. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1960.

SCHMUTZER, Manfred. Ingenium und Individuum: eine sozialwissenschaftlicher Theorie der Wissenschaft und Technik. Wein: Springer-Verlag, 1994.

SCHWARZ, Michiel; THOMPSON, Michael. Divided we stand: redefining politics, technology and social choice. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1990.

SEERS, Dudley. (1980) The cultural lag in economics” In: PAJESTKA, Jozef; FEINSTEIN, C.H. (Eds). The relevance of economic theories, p. 3-16. London: Macmillan, 1980.

SPENCE, Randy. Economic growth. In: DENEULIN, Severine; SHAHANI, Lila (Eds.). An introduction to the Human development and capability approach: freedom and agency, p. 73-100. London: Earthscan, 2010.

STEGER, Manfred; ROY, Ravi. Neoliberalism: a very short introduction. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, 2010.

SUNKEL, Osvaldo. Transnational capitalism and national disintegration in Latin America. Social and Economic Studies, v. 22, n. 1, p. 132-176, 1973.

SWEDLOW, Brendon. Advancing policy theory with cultural theory: an introduction to the special issue. Policy Studies Journal, v. 42, n. 4, p. 465-483, 2014.

THOMPSON, Michael. Cultural theory, climate change and clumsiness. Economic and Political Weekly, v. 38, n. 48, p. 5107-5112, 2003.

THOMPSON, Michael, ELLIS, Richard; WILDAVSKY, Aaron; WILDAVSKY, Mary. Cultu­ral theory. Oxford: Westview Press, 1990.

THOMPSON, Michael; ELLIS, Richard. Introduction: political cultures. In: SUN-KI, Chai; SWEDLOW, Brendon (Eds.). Culture and social theory / Aaron Wildavsky, p. 1-13. London: Transaction Publishers, 1998.

THURBON, Elizabeth. The resurgence of the developmental state: a conceptual defence. Critique internationale, v. 63, n. 2, p. 59-75, 2014.

TORTOSA, José. Sumak Kawsay, Suma Qamaña, Buen Vivir. Madrid: Fundación Carolina, 2009

VERWEIJ, Marco. Clumsy solutions for a wicked world: how to improve global governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

WALSH, Catherine. Development as buen vivir: institutional arrangements and (de)colonial entanglements. Development, v. 53, n. 1, p. 15-21, 2010.

WIILDAVSKY, Aron. Cultural analysis: politics, public law, and administration. Pisca­taway, NE: Transaction Publishers, 2006.

WITTEK, Rafael; SNIJDERS, Tom; NEE, Victor. Introduction: rational choice social research. In: WITTEK, Rafael; SNIJDERS, Tom; NEE, Victor (Eds.). The handbook of rational choice social research, p. 1-32. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2013.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-19

How to Cite

Garcés-Velástegui, P. (2022). Development in Latin America: political economies as a matter of culture. Sociedade E Estado, 37(03), 931–953. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-6992-202237030008

Issue

Section

Artigos

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.