Investigando a Emergência de Relações Equivalentes a partir de Estruturas de Treino Mutuamente Excludentes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e3525Palavras-chave:
Equivalência de estímulos, Classes excludentes, Comportamento simbólico, Controle de estímulosResumo
Investigou-se a formação de classes equivalentes a partir de estruturas de treino de discriminações condicionais que correspondem a relações emergentes mutuamente excludentes. Participaram um total de 10 universitários distribuídos em dois experimentos. As relações treinadas foram B1A1, B2A2, B3A3, D1C1, D2C2, D3C3, B1C2, B2C1, B3C3, D1A1, D2A2 e D3A3. Foram testadas as relações AC, CA, BD e DB. O Experimento II diferiu-se do Experimento I por incluir uma revisão das relações de treino. Os resultados sugerem a formação de classes para sete dos 10 participantes, sem diferenças significativas entre os experimentos. Contudo, foram estabelecidas diferentes classes para os participantes de ambos os experimentos, sugerindo que a ordem de treino não foi suficiente para determinar quais classes de equivalência seriam formadas.
Downloads
Referências
Almeida, J. H., & Haydu, V. B. (2011). Reorganization of equivalence classes: Analysis of reversed baseline relations. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 24(3), 609-620.
Bortoloti, R., Rodrigues, N. C., Cortez, M. D., Pimentel, N., & de Rose, J. C. (2013). Overtraining increases the strength of equivalence stimulus. Psychology & Neuroscience, 6(3), 357-364.
Carvalho, M. P., & de Rose, J. C. (2014). Understanding racial attitudes through the stimulus equivalence paradigm. The Psychological Record, 64(3), 527-536.
Dickins, D. W., Bentall, R. P., & Smith, A. B. (1993). The role of individual stimulus names in the emergence of equivalence relations: The effects of paired-associates training between names. The Psychological Record, 43, 713-724.
Dickins, T. E., & Dickins, D. W. (2001). Symbols, stimulus equivalence and the origins of language. Behavior and Philosophy, 29, 221-244.
Doran, E., & Fields, L. (2012). All stimuli are equal, but some are more equal than others: Measuring relational preferences within an equivalence class.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior , 98, 243-256.
Ferreira, P. R. S., Domeniconi, C., & de Rose, J. C. C. (2010). As extensões do tacto segundo a concepção de propriedade de estímulo. Acta Comportamentalia, 18, 257-278.
Fields, L., Adams, B. J., Verhave, T., & Newman, S. (1990). The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53(3), 345-358. http://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1990.53-345
Fields, L., Arntzen, E., Nartey, R. K., & Eilifsen, C. (2012). Effects of a meaningful a discriminative, and a meaningless stimulus on equivalence class formation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 97, 163-181.
Folsta, A. G., & de Rose, J. C. (2007). Rearrangement of equivalence classes after reversal of a single baseline relation: Influence of class size. Experimental Analysis of Human Behavior Bulletin, 25, 1-5.
Garotti, M., & de Rose, J. C. (2007). Reorganization of equivalence classes: Evidence for contextual control by baseline reviews before probes. The Psychological Record, 57, 87-102.
Garotti, M., de Souza, D. G., de Rose, J. C., Molina, R. C., & Gil, M. S. A. (2000). Reorganization of equivalence classes after reversal of baseline relations. The Psychological Record, 40, 35-48.
Mackay, H. A., Wilkinson, K. M., Farrell, C., & Serna, R.W. (2011). Evaluating merger and intersection of equivalence classes with one member in common.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 96, 87-105.
Nevin, J. A. (1992). An integrative model for the study of behavioral momentum. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 57, 301-316.
Pilgrim, C., & Galizio, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: I Adults. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 225-238.
Pilgrim, C., Chambers, L., & Galizio, M. (1995). Reversal of baseline relations and stimulus equivalence: II Children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 230-254.
Saunders, R. R., & Green, G. (1999). A discrimination analysis of training-structure effects on stimulus equivalence outcomes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 117-137.
Sidman, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5-13.
Sidman, M. (2000). Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 127-146.
Sidman, M., Cresson, O., Jr., & Willson-Moris, M. (1974). Acquisition of matching-to-sample via mediated transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 261-273.
Sidman, M., Rauzin, R., Lazar, R., Cunningham, S., Tailby, W., & Carrigan, P. (1982). A search for symmetry in the conditional discriminations of rhesus monkeys, baboons and children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23-44.
Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discriminations vs. matching-to-sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5-22.
Skinner, B. F. (1957).Verbal behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Smith, A. B., Dickins, D. W., & Bentall, R. P. (1996). The role of individual stimulus names in the emergence of equivalence relations II: The effects of interfering tasks prior to and after tests for emergent relations. The Psychological Record, 46, 109-130.
Spradlin, J. E., Cotter, V. W., & Baxley, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training: A study of transfer with retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 556-556
