Les échelles de bien-être de l’enfant: caractéristiques psychométriques de la version portugaise
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e38515.pt%20%20Mots-clés :
Analyse factorielle, Bien-être de l'enfant, Psychométrie, Services de protection de l'enfanceRésumé
Au Portugal, il y a un manque d'instruments validés pour l'évaluation des programmes de protection de l'enfance. La présente étude visait à valider et à explorer les caractéristiques psychométriques des échelles de protection de l'enfance, une mesure d'évaluation multidimensionnelle des situations potentielles de maltraitance et de négligence. L'instrument a été appliqué par 46 techniciens à 276 familles accompagnés de services de protection des mineurs en Algarve. Des mesures de l'efficacité et de la satisfaction parentales et la symptomatologie parentale ont également été recueillies. L'analyse factorielle exploratoire a détecté une solution à trois facteurs très identiques à la version originale, avec des niveaux élevés de cohérence interne. En termes de validité de construit, des corrélations significatives ont été trouvées dans la direction attendue. Les résultats trouvés confirment l'applicabilité de ces échelles, servant de guide pour l'évaluation et la prise de décision concernant les mesures de protection de l'enfance.
Téléchargements
Références
Arredondo, V., Saavedra, C., & Guerra, C. (2017a). Evaluación de un instrumento de apoyo institucional en casos de maltrato infantil. Revista Evaluar, 17(2), 165-176. https://doi.org/10.35670/1667-4545.v17.n2.18729
Arredondo, V., Saavedra, C., & Guerra, C. (2017b). Análisis psicométrico preliminar de un instrumento para evaluar el reconocimiento de situaciones de maltrato infantil (I-REC) en Chile. Revista de Psicología Clínica Con Niños y Adolescentes, 4(2), 111–117. http://www.revistapcna.com/sites/default/files/16-28.pdf
Ayala-Nunes, L., Jiménez, L., Jesus, S., Nunes, C., & Hidalgo, V. (2018). An ecological model of well-being in child welfare referred children. Social Indicators Research, 140(2), 811-836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-017-1807-x
Bandalos, D. L., & Finney, S. J. (2010). Factor Analysis: Exploratory and Confirmatory. In G. R. Hancock y R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods (pp. 98-122). Routledge.
Bartelink, C., van Yperen, T. A., & ten Berge, I. J. (2015). Deciding on child maltreatment: A literature review on methods that improve decision-making. Child Abuse and Neglect, 49, 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.07.002
Caldwell, B. M., & Bradley, R. H. (1984). Home observation for measurement of the environment. University of Arkansas.
Carretero-Dios, H. & Pérez, C. (2005). Normas para el desarrollo y revisión de estudios instrumentales. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 5, 521-551. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=337/33705307
De Paúl, J., & Arruabarrena, M. I. (1999). Escalas de Bienestar Infantil de Magura y Moses. Un primer estudio para la validación de la versión española. Psychosocial Intervention, 8(1), 89-108. http://www.copmadrid.org/webcopm/publicaciones/social/47562.pdf
Ferrando, J. P., & Anguiano-Carrasco, C. (2010). El análisis factorial como técnica de investigación en psicología. Papeles del Psicologo, 31(1), 18–33. http://www.papelesdelpsicologo.es/contenido?num=1137
Gaudín, J. M., Polansky, N. A., & Kilpatrick, A. C. (1992). The Child Well-Being Scales: A field trial. Child Welfare, 71(4), 319–328.
Gibaud-Wallston, J., & Wandersmann, L. P. (1978). Development and utility of the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale. John F. Kennedy center for research on education and human development.
Goldberg, D., & Williams, P. (1996). Cuestionario de salud general GHQ (General Health Questionnaire). Guía para el usuario de las distintas versiones. Masson.
Grimaldi-Puyana, V., Garrido-Fernández, M., & Jiménez-Morago, J. (2012). Perfiles de riesgo infantil y niveles de intervención con familias usuarias del Sistema Público Servicios Sociales. Anales de Psicología, 28(2), 515-523. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.28.2.148751
Grimaldi, V., Pérez-Padilla, J., Garrido, M. Á., & Lorence, B. (2019). Assessment and decision-making in child protective services: Risk situations kept-at-home versus out-of-home care. Child Indicators Research, 12(5), 1611–1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12187-018-9600-1
James, A., McLeod, J., Hendy, S., Marks, K., Rusu, D., Nik, S., & Plank, M. J. (2019). Using family network data in child protection services. PLoS ONE, 14(10), e0224554. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224554
Johnston, C., & Mash, E. J. (1989). A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp1802_8
Leitão, I. B., Dias, A., Tristão, K., Ronchi, J., & Avellar, L. (2020). Dez anos de um CAPSi: Comparação da caracterização de usuários atendidos. Psicologia USP, 31, e190011. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6564e190011
López, M., Fluke, J. D., Benbenishty, R., & Knorth, E. J. (2015). Commentary on decision-making and judgments in child maltreatment prevention and response: An overview. Child Abuse and Neglect, 49(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.08.013
Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Ferrando, P. J. (2006). FACTOR: A computer program to fit the exploratory factor analysis model. Behavior Research Methods, 38(1), 88–91. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192753
Magura, S., & Moses, B. S. (1986). Outcome measures for child welfare services: Theory and applications. Child Welfare League of America.
Magura, S., & Moses, B. S. (1987). Outcome measures for child welfare services: Child well-being scales and rating form. Child Welfare League of America.
Ménendez, S. A., Hidalgo, M. V. G., Lorence, B. L., & Pérez, J. P. (2016). Assessing the level of risk of families supported by child and family protection services: Practitioners and mothers as informants. Journal of Social Work, 16(5), 595–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017315583174
Nasuti, J. P. (1998). Risk assessment in child protective services: Challenges in measuring child well-being. Journal of Family Social Work, 3(1), 55-70. https://doi.org/10.1300/J039v03n01_05
Nunes, C., & Ayala-Nunes, L. (2017). Parenting sense of competence in at psychosocial risk families and child well-being. Bordon, 69(1), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.13042/Bordon.2016.48589
Nunes, C., Jiménez, L., Menéndez, S., Ayala-Nunes, L. & Hidalgo, V. (2016). Psychometric properties of an adapted version of the parental sense of competence (PSOC) scale for Portuguese at-risk parents. Child & Family Social Work, 21(4), 433-441. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12159.
Pais-Ribeiro, J., & Antunes, S. (2003). Contribuição para o estudo de adaptação do Questionário de Saúde Geral de 28 Itens (General Health Questionnaire-GHQ28). Revista Portuguesa de Psicossomática, 5(1), 37-45. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=28750105
Pereira, D., & Alarcão, M. (2015). Guia de avaliação das capacidades parentais: Estudo de validade ecológica. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 31(2), 203-212. https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18124
Rodrigues, L., Calheiros, M., & Pereira, C. (2015). The decision of out-of-home placement in residential care after parental neglect: Empirically testing a psychosocial model. Child Abuse and Neglect, 49, 35–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.03.014
Serbati, S., Pivetti, M., & Gioga, G. (2015). Child Well-Being Scales (CWBS) in the assessment of families and children in home-care intervention: An empirical study. Child and Family Social Work, 20(4), 446–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12094
Tabachnick, B. G. & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics (7 th ed.). Pearson Education.
Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353
Vézina, A., & Pelletier, D. (1993). Un instrument de mesure pour faciliter l’évaluation et l’intervention en protection de la jeunesse. Service Social, 42(2), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.7202/706618ar
Vézina, A., & Bradet, R. (1990). Validation québécoise de l’inventaire concernant le bien-être de l’enfant en relation avec l’exercice des responsabilités parentales. Rapport de recherche. Centre de recherche sur les services communautaires: Université Laval.
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Cristina Nunes, Lara Ayala-Nunes, Laura Inês Ferreira, Cátia Martins 2022
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
