O Conceito de Contingência Tríplice na Analise do Comportamento Humano

Autores/as

  • João Cláudio Todorov Universidade de Brasília

Resumen

RESUMO ”” Com exemplos encontrados na literatura especializada demonstra-se a utilidade do conceito de contingência tríplice como instrumento para a análise do comportamento humano. São discutidos tópicos como o controle da resposta pelo estímulo discriminativo, as diversas funções do estímulo antecedente, o controle da resposta por generalização de estímulos e alterações no controle exercido pelo estímulo discriminativo (mudanças na relação resposta-conseqüência, alterações em variáveis de contexto e variações no nível motivacional).

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

AZRIN, N.H. (1958) Some effects of noise on human behavior. Journal of the
Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1,183-200.
BAHRICK. H.P., FITTS, P.M., & RANKIN, R.E. (1952) Effects of incentives upon
reactions to peripheral stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology,
38, 643-658.
BARTLEY, S.H. (1969) Principles of perception. New York: Harper & Row.
ВОЕ, R. & WINOKUR, S. (1978) A procedure for studying echoic control in
verbal behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 30,
213-217.
DE VILLIERS, P. (1977) Choice in concurrent schedules and a quantitative formulation
of the law of effect. In W.K. Honig & J.E.R. Staddon (Orgs.), Handbook
of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1977. (1970)
DE VILLIERS, P. & HERRNSTEIN, R.J. (1976) Toward a law of response strength.
Psychological Bulletin, 83, 1131-1153.
EISENBERGER, R. (1970) Is there a deprivation-satiation function for social
approval? Psychologial Bulletin, 74,255-275.
ERICKSEN, C.W. & BROWNE, T. (1956) An experimental and theoretical analysis
of perceptual defense. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52,
224-230.
FERRARA, M.L.D. (1981) Algumas considerações acerca da distinção operanterespondente.
Cadernos de Análise do Comportamento, 1, 5-12.
FERSTER, С.В. & SKINNER, B.F. (1957) Schedules of reinforcement. New York:
Appleton-Century-Crofts.
GILCHRIST, J.C. & NESBERG, L.S. (1952) Need and perceptual change in needrelated
objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 369-376.
GOLDIAMOND, I. (1962) Perception. In A.J. Bachrach (Org.), Experimental foundations
of clinical psychology. New York: Basic Books, pp. 280-340.
GUTTMAN, N. & KALISH, H.I. (1956) Discriminability and stimulus generalization.
Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51, 79-88.
HARZEM, P. & MILES, T.R. (1978) Conceptual issues in operant psychology.
New York: Wiley.
HENTON, W.M. (1978) Review of classical-operant conditionning, parameter by
parameter. In W.M. Henton e I.H. Iversen (Orgs.), Classical conditionning and
operant conditionning. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 19-96
HERRNSTEIN, R.J. (1970) On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental
Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243-266.
HICKS, R.G. (1970) Experimenter effects on the physiological experiment. Psychophysiology,
7, 10-17.
HONIG, W.K. (1966) Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New
York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
HONIG. W.K. & STADDON, J.E.R. (1977) Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood
Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
HONIG, W.K. & URCUIOLI, P.J. (1981) The legacy of Guttman and Kalish
(1956): 25 years of research on stimulus generalization. Journal of the Experimental
Analysis of Behavior, 36, 405-445.
KELLER, F.S. & SCHOENFELD, W.N. (1950) Principles of psychology. New
York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
KELLEHER, R.T. (1966) Chaining and conditioned reinforcement. In W.K. Honig
(Org.) Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York. Appleton-
Century-Crofts.
MAHER, B.A. (1966) Principles of psychopathology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
MATOS, M.A. (1981) O controle de estímulos sobre o comportamento. Psicologia,
7, 1-15.
MILLENSON, J.R. (1975) Princípios de análise do comportamento. Brasília: Coordenada.
SALZINGER, K. (1969) The place of operant conditioning of verbal behavior in
psychotherapy. In C.M. Franks (Org.), Behavior therapy: Appaisal and status.
New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 375-395.
SALZINGER, K. & SALZINGER, S. (1973) The reinforcement contingency: A
critical behavior theory concept to understanding abnormal behavior. In M.
Hammer, K. Salzinger e S. Sutton (Orgs.), Psychopathology: Contributions
from the social, behavioral, and biological sciences. New York: Wiley, pp.
111-125.
SKINNER, B.F. (1953) Science and human behavior. New York: McMillan.
SKINNER, B.F. (1969) Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis.
New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
TODOROV, J.C. (1974) Medidas relativas de la ejecución mantenida por programas
de refuerzo. In R. Ardila (Org.), El Análisis experimental del comportamiento:
la contribución latinoamericana. México: Trillas. pp. 66-97.
TODOROV, J.C. (1982) Behaviorismo e análise experimental do comportamento.
Cadernos de Análise do Comportamento, 3,10-23.
TODOROV, J.C., CAVALCANTE DE SOUZA, E.C., TORREZAN, E.A., & GOMIDE
Jr., S. (1979). Controle discriminativo do comportamento verbal. Trabalho
apresentado na IX Reunião Anual de Psicologia, Sociedade de Psicologia de
Ribeirão Preto, outubro.
ULLMANN, L. P. & KRASNER, L. (1969) A psychological approach to abnormal
behavior. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
WOLPE, J. (1958) Psychotherapy by reciprocal inhibition. Stanford: Stanford University
Press.
ZARLOCK, S.P. (1966) Social expectations, language, and schizophrenia. Journal of
Humanistic Psychology, 6, 68-74.

Publicado

2012-04-26

Cómo citar

Cláudio Todorov, J. (2012). O Conceito de Contingência Tríplice na Analise do Comportamento Humano. Psicologia: Teoria E Pesquisa, 1(1), 75–88. Recuperado a partir de https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/16801

Número

Sección

Artigos

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a