The Effects of Behavioral History and Instructions upon the Acquisition and Resistance to Extinction with a Multiple FR DRL Schedule

Authors

  • Celso Aparecido Athayde Neto Centro Universitário Filadélfia - UniFil
  • Carlos Eduardo Costa Universidade Estadual de Londrina
  • Roberto Alves Banaco Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUC SP

Keywords:

Behavioral history, Instructions, Multiple schedules, Acquisition, Resistance to extinction, Humans

Abstract

To investigate the effects of the behavioral history and instructions on acquisition and resistance to extinction
with a multiple schedule, 15 students were distributed into three groups. In Phase 1, Group 1 was exposed to gradual increases
in the values of the components until a multiple FR 60 DRL 20 s; groups 2 and 3 were directly exposed to that multiple
schedule, but Group 3 received instructions. In Phase 2, the FR was adjusted and a multiple FR n DRL 20 s was maintained
until stability. In Phase 3, a multiple Extinction schedule was in effect. Instructions, as compared to direct or gradual exposure
to the schedules, facilitated acquisition of differentiated response rates, but increased resistance to extinction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albuquerque, L. C., de Souza, D. G., Matos, M. A., & Paracampo, C.

C. P. (2003). Análise dos efeitos de histórias experimentais sobre

o seguimento subsequente de regras. Acta Comportamentalia,

(1), 87-126.

Catania, A. C. (1999). Aprendizagem: comportamento, linguagem e

cognição (4ª. ed., D. G. de Souza et al., (Trads.). Porto Alegre:

Artes Médicas

Cerutti, D. T. (1989).Discrimination theory of rule-governed

behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,

(2), 259-276.

Costa, C. E., & Banaco, R. A. (2002). ProgRef v3: sistema

computadorizado para a coleta de dados sobre programas de

reforço com humanos ”“ recursos básicos. Revista Brasileira

de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 4, 171-172.

Costa, C. E., & Banaco, R. A. (2003). ProgRef v3: sistema

computadorizado para a coleta de dados sobre programas de

reforço com humanos ”“ recursos adicionais. Revista Brasileira

de Terapia Comportamental e Cognitiva, 5, 219-229.

Costa, C. E., & Cançado, C. R. X. (2012). Stability check: A program

for calculating the stability of behavior. Mexican Journal of

Behavior Analysis, 38(1), 61-71.

Costa, C. E., Soares, P. G., & Ramos, M. N. (2012). Controle

de estímulos e história comportamental: uma replicação

sistemática de Freeman e Lattal (1992). Temas em Psicologia

da SBP, 20(1), 273-288.

dos Santos, C. V. (2005). Momento comportamental. Em J. Abreu-

Rodrigues & M. R. Ribeiro (Eds.), Análise do Comportamento:

pesquisa, teoria e aplicação (pp. 63-80). Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Haas, J. R., & Greenway, D.

E. (1986). Instructions, multiple schedules, and extinction:

Distinguishing rule-governed from schedule-controlled

behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,

(2), 137-147.

Hayes, S. C., Brownstein, A. J., Zettle, R. D., Rosenfarb, I., & Korn,

Z. (1986). Rule-governed behavior and sensitivity to changing

consequences of responding. Journal of the Experimental

Analysis of Behavior, 45(3), 237-256.

Lattal, K. A. (1989). Contingencies on response rate and resistance

to change. Learning and Motivation, 20, 191-203.

Madden, G. J., Chase, P. N., & Joyce, J. H. (1998). Making sense

of sensitivity in the human operant literature. The Behavior

Analyst, 21(1), 1-12.

Nevin, J. A. (1974). Response strength in multiple schedules.

Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 21(3),

-408.

Okouchi, H. (1999). Instructions as discriminative stimuli. Journal

of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 72, 205-214.

Perone, M. (1991). Experimental design in the analysis of freeoperant

behavior. Em I. H. Iversen & K. A. Lattal (Orgs.),

Experimental Analysis of Behavior - Part I (pp. 59-85). New

York: Elsevier.

Podlesnik, C. A., & Chase, P. N. (2006). Sensitivity and

strength: Effects of instruction on resistance to change. The

Psychological Record, 56, 303-320.

Porto, T. H., Ramos, M. N., & Costa, C. E. (2011). História de

aquisição do comportamento em um múltiplo FR-DRL:

diferenciação e estabilidade das taxas de respostas. Acta

Comportamentalia, 19(3), 281-306.

Rosenfarb, I. S., Newland, M. C., Brannon, S. E., & Howey, D.

S. (1992). Effects of self-generated rules on the development

of schedule-controlled behavior. Journal of the Experimental

Analysis of Behavior, 58(1), 107-121.

Rumbold, G. R., & White, J. M. (1987). Effects of repeated

alcohol administration on human operant behaviour.

Psychopharmacology, 92(2), 186-191.

Schoenfeld, W. N., Cumming, W. W., & Hearst, E. (1956). On the

classification of reinforcement schedules. Proceedings of the

National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,

, 563-570.

Soares, P. G., Costa, C. E., Cançado, C. R. X., & Cirino, S. D. (2013).

Controle de estímulos e história comportamental em humanos.

Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 26(2), 357-366.

Skinner, B. F. (1969). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical

analysis. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Published

2015-11-17

How to Cite

Athayde Neto, C. A., Costa, C. E., & Banaco, R. A. (2015). The Effects of Behavioral History and Instructions upon the Acquisition and Resistance to Extinction with a Multiple FR DRL Schedule. Psicologia: Teoria E Pesquisa, 31(3), 365–374. Retrieved from https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18610