HISTORICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL ISSUES CONCERNING BEHAVIORIST APPROACH:

ABOUT THE TRANSITION OF CLASSICAL BEHAVIORISM TO NEOBEHAVIORISM

Authors

  • Jair Lopes-Júnior Universidade Estadual Paulista - Bauru

Keywords:

Classical behaviorism, Neobehaviorism, Logical positivism, Privacy

Abstract

The study was designed to investigate whether the conditions
for the development of the methodological priority as far as its influence on
the study of privacy by a science of behavior could be historical and epistemological aspects of two differents versions of behavioristic
approach: the classical (Watsonian) behaviorism and neobehaviorism.The
procedure consisted in theoretical analysis of bibliografic material concerning
to a) Watson's behaviorism; b) the relations between it and neobehaviorism.
It was observed, as results, that: a) the purpose of Watson's
behaviorism to convert psychology in a natural science had two features:
i) the priority of methodological dimension: and ii) the need of a epistemological
support for it: b) one of the main characterístics of neobehaviorism
was to search that support in logical positivism; c)there are interpretative
controversies in the study of the relations between that two approaches.
These data suggest that relations mentioned above could be a criterion to
make difference between versions in the behavioristic approach, specially
in the demarcation of radical behaviorism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ayer, A.J. (1978). El positivismo lógico. Madrid: Fondo de Cultura Econômica.
Harrell, W.; Harrison L. (1938). The rise and the fall of behaviorism. Journal of General
Psychology, 18, 367-421.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1973). Introduction to John Watson's Comparative Psychology. Em M. Henle; J. Jaynes; J. J. Sullivan (Orgs.) Historical conceptions of psychology.
New York: Springer. (p.98-115).
Hocutt, M. (1985). The Truth in Behaviorism: A Review of G.E. Zuriff, Behaviorism: A
Conceptual Reconstruction. Behaviorism, 73(1), 77-82.
Koch, S. (1964). Psychology and Emerging Conceptions of Knowledge as Unitary. In
T. S. WANN, (Orgs.) Behaviorism and phenomenology: Contrasting bases for
modem psychology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (p. 1-45)
Mace, A.C. (1948). Some implications of analytical behaviorism. Aristotelian Society
XLIX, 1-16.
Mackenzie, B. (1977). Behaviorism and the limits of scientific methods. London:
Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Skinner, B. F. (1964). Behaviorism at Fifty. In T.S. Wann, (Org.) Behaviorism and
phenomenology: Contrasting bases of modem psychology. Chicago: University
of Chicago Press.(p.79-108)
Skinner, B. F. (1974). About Behaviorism. New York: Knopf
Smith, L. (1989). Behaviorism and logical positivism. Stanford: Stanford University
Press.
Watson, J. (1963). Behaviorism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zuriff, G. E. (1984). Radical behaviorism and theoretical entities. The Behavioral and
Brain Sciences, 7(4), p. 572.
Zuriff, G. E. (1985). Behaviorism: A conceptual reconstruction. New York: Columbia
University Press.

Published

2013-04-25

How to Cite

Lopes-Júnior, J. (2013). HISTORICAL AND EPISTEMOLOGICAL ISSUES CONCERNING BEHAVIORIST APPROACH:: ABOUT THE TRANSITION OF CLASSICAL BEHAVIORISM TO NEOBEHAVIORISM. Psicologia: Teoria E Pesquisa, 9(2), 271–282. Retrieved from https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/17218