South Korea´s expanding regional and global roles: challenges and perspectives

Authors

  • Lytton L. Guimarães Universidade de Brasília

Keywords:

South Korea. Regional and global roles. Challenges and perspectives.

Abstract

In the last four decades the Republic of Korea (South Korea or Korea) developed from a poor country and an agrarian society into a wealthy and industrial nation and a world leader in important areas such as information technology and innovation. Despite its remarkable achievements at the national level, at the regional and global levels Korea´s role was somewhat marginal until the 1990s. With the end of the Cold War and its diplomatic foundations established Korea´s foreign policy underwent rapid transformations; its scope became global and included what has been called “summit diplomacy”, designed to consolidate friendly relations and start new partnerships and projects of cooperation for the 21th century. At the regional level it is an active member of Asean+3, of Apec and of other organizations; since 2008 it maintains annual Trilateral Summit Meetings with China and Japan, and in September 2011 Seoul became seat of the Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat. Only a few years after joining the UN (1991), in November 1995 the country was elected a non-permanent member of the UNSC, and recently was again elected for the period of 2013-2014; in 2006 Ban Ki-moon,
a Korean Diplomat, was elected the 8th Secretary General of the UN and in June 2011 he had his mandate renewed until 2016. These and other important achievements
are evidence of Korea´s assertive role as a regional and global actor. To strengthen cooperation with established and emerging international partners the country will rely on the following policy directions and strategies: expand export markets, attract FDI, pursue bilateral trade and intensify ties with major trading partners. It is clear, however, that in addition to its undeniable economic success story and political achievements at the regional and international levels, external variables are quite important in Korea´s determination to expand its regional and global roles: the domestic and international policies and consequent strategies implemented by China, the United States, and Japan, as well the future relationships among these three countries. The relationships between the US and China, in particular, will determine to a large extent what will happen in East Asia. China has become Korea´s number one trade partner, but Korea is heavily dependent on the US for security and military assistance. Therefore, the new Korean government is expected to play a kind of pendulum strategy between the two major powers, as well as a somewhat neutral role with respect to Sino-Japanese China relations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Lytton L. Guimarães, Universidade de Brasília

Co-coordinator Asian Studies Group, Center for Advanced Multidisciplinary Studies University of Brasilia. 

References

CHAIBONG, Hahm. South Korea´s Miraculous Democracy. Journal of Democracy, v. 10, n. 3, p. 128-142, July 2008.

CHOE, Sang-Hun. Departing South Korean Leader Creates Furor with Pardons. The New York Times, Jan. 29, 2013.

CHUNG, Kyung-young. Evaluation of the Lee Myung-bak Administration’s Foreign Policy and Recommendations for the Next South Korean President. The 3rd East Asia Situation Assessment Workshop, IISEA affiliated with NACSI, September 8, 2012. Available: .

ECONOMIST INTELLIGENCE UNIT (EIU). Democracy index 2012: democracy in retreat. The Economist Intelligence Unit’s Index of Democracy 2010, A Report of the Economist Intelligence Unit, London, 2012.

GUIMARAES, Lytton L. South Korea´s Foreign and Security Policies: some implications for East Asia Integration and for Latin America, paper presented at the UCLA-CKS Joint Research Project-II 2011 Conference, Los Angeles, May 5-6, 2011.

HUNTINGTON, Samuel. The Third Wave: democratization in the late 20th century. Univ. of Oklahoma Press, 1992, 366 p.

JAPAN, MOFA. Japan-China-ROK Trilateral Summit, “Joint Statement for Tripartite Partnership”, Fukuoka, 13 December 2008. Available: <http://www.mofa;go.jp/region/asia-paci/jck/summit/html>.

______. www.japan.or.jp.

JWA, Sung-Hee. The evolution of large corporations in Korea. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edgar Elgar, 2002.

KALINOWSKI, Thomas; CHOI, H. Korea´s search for a global role between economic interests and soft power. 2012. Available: .

KIM, Dae-jung. New Challenges for the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia: The Role of the Republic of Korea and the United States. The Council on Foreign Relations, Transcript, New York, June 8, 1998.

KIM, Samuel S (Ed.). Korea´s democratization. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2003.

KIM, Taehyun. Engaging the estranged reciprocity and cooperation on the Korean Peninsula. Journal of East Asian Studies, v. 3, n. 2, p. 169-197, May-Aug. 2003.

KIRK, Donald. Kim Dae-jung controversial bid for “sunshine. Christian Science Monitor, Aug. 18, 2009.

KOREA. Republic of. Presidential Commission for Policy Consultation, 1998, The Great Transformation and the Direction for Reform [in Korean], Seoul, The Kim Dae-jung Government: The Sunshine Policy. Seoul, South Korea: Millenum Books, 1999. p. 37-39.

KOREA. MOFAT. Diplomacy with Latin America and the Caribbean. Ch.3. Diplomacy for Global Network. 2009. Available: . Accessed: 18 Nov. 2010.

______. MOFAT. Two years of Roh Moo-hyun administration. Achievements and challenges. Seoul, Korea: Korean Overseas Information Service, 2005. Available: <http://www.mofat.go.kr>. Accessed: 21 Nov. 2010.

______. MOFAT. Korea´s Foreign Policy in 2008. Diplomatic White Paper 2009, Part 1, Ch. 2. Available <http://www.mofat.go.kr>.

______. MOFAT. Korea´s Foreign Policy 2010. Diplomatic White Paper 2010. Available: <http://www.mofat.go.kr>.

______. Cheong Wa Dae (Presidential Office). Available: <http://english.president.go.kr/m>.

LEE, B. J. Selling South Korea: Lee Myung-bak wants to move his country to the center of the world. Newsweek, Jan. 16, 2010.

LEE, Jung-bock. Overview of Democratization in the Republic of Korea. Democratic Consolidation in the Republic of Korea: progress and challenges. Washington, DC: The Broodings Institution, February 2, 2009.

MCKINSEY GLOBAL INSTITUTE (MGI). Beyond Korean Style: Shaping a new Growth Formula. April 2013. Available: .

NOBEL PRIZE ORGANIZATION. nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2000/DAE-jung-bio.html; Kim Dae-jung Presidential Library and Museum. Available: <http://eng.kdjlibrary.org/main.html>. Accessed: 13 Jan. 2010).

SHIN, Gi-wook. The Paradox of Korean Globalization. Asia-Pacific Research Cener, Stanford University, CA, 2003. Available: .

SNYDER, Scott. The end of history, the rise of ideology, and the future of democracy in the Korean Peninsula. Journal of East Asian Studies, v. 3, n. 2, p. 199-223, May-Aug. 2003.

SONG, Sang-ho. Lee Myun-bak leaves Cheong Wa Dae with mixed scorecard. The Korea Herald, 22.02.2013, Asia News Network. Available: .

SOUTH KOREA. Korean Development Institute (KDI). Economic Outlook 2013 First Half. Available: <http://kdi.re.kr/kdi/eng/database/report>.

______. MOFAT. White Papers 2006.

THE SOCIETY for Northeast Asian Peace Studies. The Kim Dae-jung Government: The Sunshine Policy. Seoul, South Korea: Millenum Books, 1999.

WALSH, Bryan. Leaders & visionaries: Lee Myung Bak. Time, in partnership with CNN. Available: . Accessed: 18 Jan. 2011).

Published

2013-11-05

How to Cite

Guimarães, L. L. (2013). South Korea´s expanding regional and global roles: challenges and perspectives. Revista Do CEAM, 2(2), 61–82. Retrieved from https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistadoceam/article/view/10054

Issue

Section

Original research