Epistemology of bioethics ”“ Latin American focus
Keywords:
Bioethics. Critical analysis. Epistemology. Plurality. Transdisciplinarity. Complexity and concrete totalityAbstract
This study is composed of two parts. In the first, there is a critical analysis of the principlist type of bioethics that originated from the United States, in which the need to construct a new and broader form of epistemology for this discipline is defended. The historical development of bioethics is divided into four stages: foundation (1970s), expansion and consolidation (1980s and beginning of the 1990s), critical review (starting in the mid-1990s) and conceptual extension (today). The authors affirm that the theory of the four principles is impotent in the light of the day-to-day macro-problems seen in the lives of poor people in peripheral countries, which makes it necessary for bioethics to expand the theoretical basis on which it is grounded. In the second part of this study, new epistemological foundations for bioethics are proposed, taking the reference points of respect for moral pluralism; the need to go more deeply into the contradiction of universalism-relativism in ethics; bioethical approaches as practical or applied forms of ethics; a focus not only on multi and interdisciplinary approaches but also essentially transdisci- plinary; and a view of the questions starting from the paradigms of complexity and concrete totality. Finally, the following reference points for structuring the new bioethical discourse are proposed: communication and language; argumentation; dialog; coherence; consensus; and rationality.
Downloads
References
Potter VR. Bioethics, the science of survival. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine. 1970, 14:127-53.
Potter VR. Bioethics: bridge to the future. New Jersey. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice hall, 1971.
Garrafa V, Porto D. Intervention bioethics: a proposal for peripheral countries in a context of power and injustice. Bioethics 2003, 17(5-6):399-416.
Ferreira ABH. Novo dicionário Aurélio da língua portuguesa. Curitiba: Nova Didática, 2006.
Olivé L. Epistemologia na ética e nas éticas aplicadas. In: Garrafa, V; Kottow, M & Saada, A (orgs). Bases conceituais da bioética ”“ enfoque latino- americano. São Paulo: Gaia / Redbioética UNESCO, 2006. pp. 121-139.
Post SG (ed). Encyclopedia of bioethics. New York: Thompson Gale, Vol. 2, 2003.
Durand G. Introdução geral à bioética ”“ história, conceitos e instrumentos. São Paulo: Loyola, 2003.
Beecher H. Ethics and clinical research. N Eng J Med 1966; 274:1354-60. 10. Clouser D, Gert B. Critique of principlism. J med Phil 1990; 15:219-36.
Bernard G et al. Bioethics: a return to fundamentals. Oxford: Oxforf Univ Press, 1997. p. 71-92.
Holm S. Not just autonomy. J Med Ethics 1995; 21:332-8.
Lepargneur H. Força e fraqueza dos princípios da bioética. In: Bioética. Novo conceito a caminho do consenso. São Paulo: Cedas/Loyola, 1996. p. 55-76.
Garrafa V. et al. Bioethical language and its dialects and idiolects. Cadernos de Saúde Pública 1999, 15 (supl. 1):35-42.
Campbell A. The president’s column. IAB News, The Newsletter of the International Association of Bioethics. Spring 1998, 7-12.
Potter VR. Global Bioethics: building on the Leopold legacy. East lansing. Michigan State University Press, 1988.
Garrafa V, Pessini L (orgs.). Bioética: poder e injustiça. São Paulo: Loyola, 2003.
UNESCO. Declaração Universal sobre Bioética e Direitos Humanos. Pa- ris, outubro 2005. Acessado em www.bioetica.catedraunesco.unb.br
Beauchamp T & Childress J. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. New York/ Oxford: Oxford University Press, 5a. ed. 2001.
Neves MCP. Bioética ou bioéticas. In: Neves MCP & Lima M (coords). Bioética ou bioéticas na evolução das sociedades. Coimbra: Gráfica de Coim- bra, 2005. p. 285-308.
Berlinguer G. Questões de vida. Ética, ciência, saúde. São Paulo: APCE/ HUCITEC/CEBES, 1993.
Garrafa V, Kottow M, Saada A. (coords.). Estatuto epistemológico de la bioética. México: UNAM / Redbioética UNESCO, 2005.
Garrafa V, Kottow M, Saada A. (orgs.). Bases conceituais da bioética ”“ en- foque latino-americano. São Paulo: Gaia / Redbioética UNESCO, 2006.
Garrafa V, Lorenzo C. Moral imperialism and multi-centric trials in peripheral countries. Cadernos de Saúde Pública; en publicación, 2008.
Abbagnano N. Dicionário de filosofia. São Paulo: Martins Fontes. 1999. 26. Engelhardt Jr HT. Fundamentos da bioética. São Paulo: Loyola, 1997.
Sperber MC. Dicionário de ética e política. São Leopoldo/Brasil: Editora Unisinos, Volume 1, 2003.
Singer P. Ética prática. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1998.
Garrafa V. Multi-inter-transadisciplinaridad, complejidad y totalidad concreta em bioética. In: Garrafa V, Kottow M, Saada A. Estatuto epistemológico de la bioética. México: UNAM / REDBIOÉTICA, 2005. p. 67-85.
Morin E. A religação dos saberes ”“ o desafio do Século 21. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2001.
Sotolongo PL. O tema da complexidade no contexto da bioética. In: Garrafa V; Kottow M, Saada A. (orgs). Op. cit. 2006, p. 121-39.
Kosik K. Dialética do concreto. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1976.
Garrafa V. O processo saúde/doença ”“ totalidade concreta. In: Tommasi AF, Garrafa V. Câncer bucal. São Paulo: Medisa, 1980. p. 40-5.
Habermas J. La inclusión del otro. Paidós: Barcelona, 2005.
Neri D. Filosofia moral. São Paulo: Loyola, 2004.
Bunge M. Dicionário de filosofia. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2002.