Alternatives for soil fertility reclamation in shift cultivation system in northeast Para.
Abstract
In a secondary vegetation area of Marapanim-PA county and using a completely randomized plot design, with four replicates, the factors slash-and-trituration practice, rock phosphate and green manure were tested as agroecology alternatives for soil fertility reclamation, through the following treatments: secondary vegetation; control; rock phosphate (RP); wonderbean [Canavalia ensiformis (L.) D.C.] (W); RP + W; RP + pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh] (P); RP + tithonia [Tithonia diversifolia (Hemsl.) A. Gray] (T); W + P; and W + T. The soil preparation for planting the cassava–corn sequential cropping was made by slash-and-trituration of the secondary vegetation. The treatments of soil fertility restoration only affected positively the corn production variables, and higher impacts were observed for rock phosphate with pigeonpea, followed by rock phosphate with wonderbean, and rock phosphate alone. In slash-and-trituration conditions and in terms of organic matter and available phosphorus, the higher positive impact in soil fertility occurred under rock phosphate with pigeonpea treatment, which reflected in corn production. Different from tithonia, pigeonpea clearly took advantage of rock phosphate.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 autor
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
The copyright of articles published in this journal remains with the authors, with first publication rights for the journal.
License
When published in this open access journal, licensed through CC BY 4.0, articles are distributed free of charge and can be shared and adapted for any purpose, including commercial. As attribution of use, the license requires that due credit be given, with a link to the license and indication of changes. This does not mean that the licensor endorses the use of the information in the article, or the person who used this information. It also implies the impossibility of applying legal or technological measures that restrict the use of the information by third parties.