Una propuesta metodológica para el análisis del dialogo: la unidad intrraccional
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35956/v.5.n1.2005.p.63-96Keywords:
Dialogue. Interaction. Interactional unit. Dominance. Power.Abstract
This article summarizes the results of a research aimed at the design an application of an interactional methodological tool in the study of discourse analysis, which we call the I-R-CR method. The purpose of the design and application of this method is the study of the relation between discourse interaction in spoken, real and concrete speech of Chilean Spanish speakers and the interpersonal dominance effects resulting from such interaction. The method proposed has been applied to samples of dramatic dialogue and institutional dialogue. The results obtained up to the present show a link between the topical development of a verbal exchange and dominance effects in terms of sequential interactional patterns systematically related to the dominance of one participant over the rest in a dialogical event.
Downloads
References
Austin, J. (1962) How to Do Things with Words. London: Oxford University Press.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas.
Bobes Navas, M. C. (1992) El Diálogo, Estudio Pragmático, Linguístico y Literário, Madrid: Editorial Gredos.
Boden, D. (1994) The Business of Talk: Organization in Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bolivar, A. (1994) Discurso e Interacción en el Texto Escrito. Caracas: Universidad Central de Venezuela.
Bolívar, A. (1986) Interaction trough written text. A Discourse analysis of new paper editorials. Tesis doctoral. Birmingham: Universidad de Birmingham.
Brown, G. & Yule G. (1980) Discourse Analysis. London: Cambridge University Press.
Drew, P. & Sojornen M. L. (1997) ‘Institutional dialogue’, en T.A. van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 92 - 117. London: Sage Publications.
Drew, P. & Heritage J. (1992) Talk at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Edelsky, C. (1987) ‘Who’s got the floor?’, en D. Tannen (Ed.) Gender and Conversational Interaction, pp. 189 - 227. New York: O.U.P.
Eggins, S. y Slade D. (1997) Casual Conversation. London: Cassell.
Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1995a) Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.
Fairclough, N. (1995b) Critical Discourse Analysis: the Critical Study of Language. Londres: Longman.
Foppa, K. (1990) ‘Topic progression and intention’, en I. Markova & K. Foppa (eds.) The Dynamics of Dialogue, pp. 178 - 208. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaff.
Foppa, K. (1995) ‘On mutual understanding and agreement in dialogues’, en I. Markova, C. Graumann & K. Foppa (eds.) Mutualities in Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grice, H. P. (1975) ‘Logic and conversation’, en P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (eds.). Syntax and Semantics III. Speech Acts, pp. 41 - 58. New York: Academic Press.
Kintsch, W. & Van Dijkt. A. (1983) Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. United Kingdom: Academic Press.
Kleiber, G. (1995) La Semântica de los Prototipos. Madrid: Visor Libros.
Linell, P. Gustavsson L. & Juvonen P. (1988) Interactional dominance in dyadic communication: a presentation of initiative-response analysis. Lingüística, 26: 415-442.
Linell, P. (1990) ‘The power of dialogue dynamics’, en I. Markobva y K. Foppa (eds.) The Dynamics ofDialogue, pp. 129 - 145. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf
Foppa, P. & Korolija N. (1997) ‘Coherence in multiparty conversation. Episodes and contexts in interaction’, en T. Givon (Ed.) Conversation, Cognitive, Communicative and Social Perspectives, pp. 167 - 206. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publications.
Linell, P. (1998) Approaching Dialogue. Talk, Interaction and Contexts in Dialogical Perspectives. Amsterdam I Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Luckmann, T. (1990) ‘Social communication, dialogue and conversation, en I. Markova & K. Foppa (eds.) The Dynamics of Dialogue, pp. 45-60. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Tsui, A. M. B. M. (1994) English conversation. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press
Markova, I. (1990a) ‘Introduction’, en I. Markova & K. Foppa (eds.) The Dynamics of Dialogue, pp. 1-22. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Markova, I. (1990b) ‘A three step process as a unit of analysis in dialogue’, en I. Markova & K. Foppa (eds). The Dynamics of Dialogue, pp. 78-208. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Markova, I., Graumann C. & Foppa K. (1995) Mutualities in Dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Massi, M. P. (2000). ‘La conformation de los roles discursivos en la interacción televisiva’, Estudios Filológicos, 35: 87-104.
Mignolo, W. (1987) ‘Diálogo y conversation’, Diálogos Hispânicos, 6: 3-26.
Mondada, L. (2001) ‘Por una lingüística interactional’, Revista Iberoamericana de Discurso y Sociedad, 3: 61-91.
Pearce, L. (1994) Reading Dialogics. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.
Pilleux, M. (1995) La entrevista como tipo de discurso: análisis lingüístico. Estúdios Filológicos, 30: 97- 95
Pomerantz, A. & Fehr B. J. (1997) ‘Conversation analysis: anapproach to the study of social action as sense making practices’, en T.Van Dijk (ed.) Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 64-92. London: Sage Publications.
Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Stubbs, M. (1983) Language, Schools and Classrooms (2a edition) London: Methuen
Psathas, G. (1995) Conversation Analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Rivano, E. (1994) Estructuras del Diálogo. Santiago de Chile: Bravo y Allende Editores.
Rommetveit, R. (1990) ‘On axiomatic features of a dialogical approach to language and mind’, en I. Markova & K. Foppa (eds.) The Dynamics of Dialogue, pp. 83-104. Hertfordshire: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Rosch, E. (1974) ‘Principles of categorisation’, en S. Lawrence & E. Margolis (eds.) Concepts: Co-readings, pp. 188-205. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Roulet, E. (2002) ‘The Geneva model of discourse analysis: an interactionist and modular approach to discourse organization, Discourse Studies, 4, 3: 369-393.
Sacks, H., Schegloff E. A. & Jefferson G. (1974) ‘A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking in conversation’, Language, 50: 696-735.
Searle, J. (1983) Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sharim, S. (1993) ‘El diálogo dramático y la unidad interaccional, Lenguas Modernas, 20: 165-184.
Sharim, S. (1999) ‘La unidad interaccional y el segmento en el diálogo dramático’, Revista Chilena de Estudios del Discurso, 1: 57 - 65.
Sharim, S. & Munoz D. (1999) ‘Propuestas para el estudio de la interacción en el diálogo institucional de un evento comunicativo del tipo foro panel’, Boletín de Filologia - Homenaje a Ambrosio Rabanales. Tomo XXXVII 1131 - 1156.
Sharim, S. & Munoz D. (2001) ‘Bases teóricas para el estudio de la interacción verbal’, Boletín de Filologia Tomo XXXVIII 301- 330.
Sinclair J. M. & Coulthard M. (1975) Toward an Analysis of Discourse: The English Used by Teachers and Pupils. London: Cambridge University Press.
Sinclair, J. M. & Brasil D. (1982) Teacher Talk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stenstrõm, A. B. (1994) An Introduction to Spoken Interaction. New York: Longman.
Taylor, J. R. (1995) Linguistic Categorization. Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Talmy, L. (2000) Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Tannen, D. (1993) ‘The relativity of linguistic strategies: rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance’, en D. Tannen (ed.). Gender and Conversational Interaction, pp. 165 - 189. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ten Have, P. (2001) ‘Applied conversation analysis’, en A. Mchoul & M. Rapley (eds.). How to Analyse Talk in Institutional Settings, pp. 3-12. London: Continuum.
Tsui, A. (1994) English Conversation. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (1981) ‘Episodes as units of discourse analysis’, en D. Tannen (ed.). Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, pp. 177 - 192. Georgetown: University Press.
van Dijk, T. A. (1997) ‘Discourse as interaction in society’, en T. A. Van Dijk (ed.). Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 1- 37. London: Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors retain the copyright and guarantee RALED the right to be the first publication of the work as well as a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with recognition of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.