Aspectos da questão metodológica na análição verbal: o continuum qualitativo-cuantitativo

Authors

  • Luiz Antônio Marcuschi Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35956/v.1.n1.2001.p.23-42

Keywords:

science. changes. theory. methods.

Abstract

We are reaching the end of the ideal of Science as imposed by neopositivism whose verifiability postulares imposed the methodology of scientific research and defined what Science was. A significant change has been observed from quantitative to qualitative, from form to function, from the unit of analysis to the individual, from controlled experiments to the observation of authentic data, from immanent meaning to contextualization. The most important that the facts of language are suggestion is socially constructed and not objective data, independent from and extrinsic to the individual. In this way, the data that were considered natural and free from the subjectivity of the observer are now seen as produced by the point of view and research interest, without necessarily giving this a negative connotation. This paper is based on the principle that research methodology only works efficiently if there is a good research problem and a good theory. So, two underlying assumptions are discussed: 1) the rejection of a strict quality-quantity dichotomy and 2) the belief in an investigative posture as the foundation for knowledge. The dilemma is not to opt for a qualitative or quantitative perspective, a structural or a meaningful analysis, a micro or macro observation and so on. The problem is to know what the aim of the research is.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luiz Antônio Marcuschi, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco

Profesor titular de la Universidad Federal de Pernambuco en Recife, Brasil. Obtuvo su doctorado en Alemania. Sus publicaciones abarcan la lingüística textual, el análisis de la conversación, la lengua hablada y escrita, los procesos de comprensión en la interacción verbal. En los últimos anos ha dado atención al problema de los métodos en el análisis de la interacción verbal y la relación entre la tecnologia y los desarrollos en la investigación lingüística. Es uno de los miembros fundadores de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Estúdios dei Discurso y representante de Brasil en esta asociación.

References

Biber, D., CONRAD, S. Y Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics. Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chomsky, N. (1975). Aspectos da Teoria Sintática. Coimbra: Armênio Amado.

Feyerabend, P. (1977). Contra o Método. São Paulo: Francisco Alves.

Gümperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hintikka, J. (1994). Estratégia e teoria da argumentação. Em Carrilho, M. M. (Org). Retórica e Comunicação, pp. 71-94. Porto: ASA.

Kerbrat-Orecchioni, C. (julho, 1996). A multilevel approach in conversation analysis. Mimeo apresentado no Congresso de Pragmática. México: Autor.

Labov, W. Y Fanshel, D. (1977). Therapeutic Discourse. New York: Academic Press.

Levinson, S. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mondada, L. (1995). Formes Linguistiques et Dynamiques Interactionnelles. Cahiers de LILSL, 7. Lausanne: Institut de Linguistiques et de Sicences du Langage, Université de Lausanne.

Newman, I. Y Benz, C.R. (1998). Qualitative-Quantitative. Research Methodology, Exploring the Interactive Continuum. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Ilinois University Press.

Ochs, E. (1979). Transcription as a Theory. Em Ochs, E. y Shieffelin, B. B. (eds). Developmental Pragmatics. pp. 43-72. New York: Acadmemic Press.

Possenti, S. (1996). O dado dado e o dado dado (O dado em análise do discurso). Em Castro, M.E P de (Org.). O método e o dado no estudo da linguagem. Campinas: Unicamp.

Sacks, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. Em Atkinson, M. y Heritage, J. (eds.). Structures ofSocial Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. pp. 21-27. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schegloff, E. Y Sacks, H. (1973). Openings up closings. Semiótica, 7, 289-327.

Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schiffrin, D. (1988). Conversation Analysis. Em Newmeyer, EJ. (ed). Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Vol. 4. Language: The Socio-cultural Context. pp. 251 - 276. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to Discourse. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.

Searle, J. R. (1998). Mind, Language and Society. Philosophy in the Real World. New York: Basic Books.

Sllverman, D. (1993). Interpreting Qualitative Data. MethodsforAnalysingTalk, Text and Interaction. London: Sage.

Vlon, R. (1992). La Communication Verbale. Analyse des Interactions. Paris: Hachette.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-03

How to Cite

Marcuschi, L. A. (2021). Aspectos da questão metodológica na análição verbal: o continuum qualitativo-cuantitativo. Revista Latinoamericana De Estudios Del Discurso, 1(1), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.35956/v.1.n1.2001.p.23-42

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2001)

Section

Research articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The authors retain the copyright and guarantee RALED the right to be the first publication of the work as well as a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with recognition of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.