Two-body problem. Part I: Newtonian theory and Kepler's laws

Authors

  • Fabio M. S. Lima Universidade de Brasília

Keywords:

Classical mechanics. Gravitational force. Two-body problem. Perihelion precession

Abstract

In this paper, which contains the part $1$ of a long work on the classical problem of the motion of two bodies atracting each other mutually through forces acting along the straight-line joining them, we present  a complete text, rich in technical details on the gravitational problem of two bodies interacting via Newton's universal law of gravitation (1687), which certainly will be useful as a didatic material for both teachers and students enrolled in Classical Mechanics courses. After finding the exact analytical solution for the equation of motion and all its corresponding trajectories, we show that the bounded periodic orbits which are non-circular are always elliptic ones without any advance of the perihelion, in full agreement to the three Kepler laws. We also indicate how to find the results corresponding to the electrodynamics analogous, i.e., when two charged corpuscles attract themselves with Coulomb's force. In the part $2$, to be published in this same journal, we shall present the unpublished translation from German to Portuguese of Einstein's original paper (1915), in which he applies his General Theory of Relativity to get an approximate solution to the relativistic gravitational two-body problem, which led to elliptic orbits with a rate for the precession of the perihelion that is in good agreement to that observed for Mercury, but not for the other planets of the solar system. At last, in part $3$ we shall present the exact solution yielded by Assis's Relational Mechanics (1989), which will allow us to compare the theoretical models from Newton, Einstein and Assis, showing that, though the last two models furnish the same rate of precession ($43$''/century), the equations of motion are not identical. We shall also show that the advance of the perihelion predicted by Relational Mechanics takes place with respect to the fixed stars, just as it has been observed and measured by astronomers, contrarily to which is found in relativistic models.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

bibitem{Kepler1609} J.~Kepler, textsl{New Astronomy} [{it Astronomia Nova}, 1609]. Translated by W.~H.~Donahue, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.

bibitem{Princ1} I.~Newton. textsl{Principia -- Princípios Matemáticos de Filosofia Natural. Livro I: O Movimento dos Corpos}. São Paulo: Nova Stella/Edusp, 1990. [Tradução da $3^a$ edição [1726] por T.~Ricci, L.~G.~Brunet, S.~T.~Gehring e M.~H.~C.~Célia]

bibitem{Princ23} I.~Newton. textsl{Principia -- Princípios Matemáticos de Filosofia Natural. Livro II: O Movimento dos Corpos (em Meios com Resistência) e Livro III: O Sistema do Mundo (tratado matematicamente)}. São Paulo: Edusp, 2008. [Tradução da $3^a$ edição (1726) por A.~K.~T.~Assis]

bibitem{Bruns} J.~Barrow-Green, textsl{The Three-Body Problem}. In T.~Gowers, J.~Barrow-Green, and I.~Leader (eds.), textsl{The Princeton Companion to Mathematics}. New York: Princeton University Press (2008), pp.~726--728.

bibitem{Poincare} J.~Bernoulli, ``Extrait de la réponse de M.~Bernoulli à M.~Herman'', datée de Basle le 7, Octobre 1710. textsl{Memoires de l'Ac. Royale des Sciences Boudot} Paris, 1710 (1712).

bibitem{Leverrier1859} U.~J.~Le Verrier, ``Theorie du Mouvement de Mercure'', Annales de l’Observatoir Impirial de Paris. textbf{V}, 1--196 (1859).

bibitem{Newcomb1882} S.~Newcomb, ``Discussion and results of observations on transits of Mercury from 1677 to 1881'', Astr. Pap. am. Ephem. naut. Alm., textbf{1}, 367--487 (U.S.~Govt.~Printing Office, Washington D.C., 1882).

bibitem{EJP2018} J.-P.~Provost and C.~Bracco, ``Lorentz's 1895 transformations, Einstein's equivalence principle and the perihelion shift of Mercury'', textit{Eur.~J.~Phys.}~textbf{39}, 065602 (2018).

bibitem{taxarecente} E.~F.~Taylor, J.~A.~Wheeler, and E.~Bertschinger. textsl{Exploring Black Holes}, 2nd Ed., Chap.~10. Freely available online at: url{https://www.eftaylor.com/exploringblackholes/Ch10AdvanceOfMercurysPerihelion200331v1.pdf}

bibitem{site2022} H.~Gutfreund, textsl{The Einstein-Besso Manuscript, a Landmark on Einstein's Road to the General Theory of Relativity}. Disponível em: url{https://blog.frontiersin.org/2022/05/04/children-in-science-the-einstein-besso-manuscript}

bibitem{Einst1915c} A.~Einstein, ``Erklärung der perihelbewegung des Merkur aus der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie'' [Explanation of the perihelion motion of Mercury from the General Theorie of Relativity], {it Preussische Akad. der Wissenschaften, Sitzungsberichte} (part 3), Vol.~textbf{11}, 831--839 (1915).

bibitem{Einst1916} A.~Einstein, ``Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie'' [The foundation of the General Theory of Relativity], {it Annalen der Physik} textbf{49}, 769--822 (1916).

bibitem{Microscope} MicroSCOPE Satellite Mission (CNES/ESA), 2017. Disponível em: url{https://directory.eoportal.org/web/eoportal/satellite-missions/m/microscope}

bibitem{Kepler1619} J.~Kepler. textsl{Harmonices Mundi} (1619), p.~189--190.

bibitem{Portuga2011} M.~F.~Ferreira da Silva, ``Quantidades médias no movimento de um corpo em trajetória elíptica'', {it Rev.~Bras.~Ens.~Fís.}~textbf{33}(3), 3315 (2011). Ver também: D.~M.~Williams, ``Average distance between a star and planet in an eccentric orbit'', textit{Am.~J.~Phys.}~textbf{71}(11), 1198--1200 (2003).

bibitem{aproxKepler} N.~M.~Swerdlow, ``Kepler's iterative solution to Kepler's equation'', {it Journal for the History of Astronomy} textbf{31}(4), 339--341 (2000).

bibitem{Ritt} J.~F.~Ritt, ``Elementary functions and their inverses,'' {it Trans.~Amer.~Math.~Soc.}~textbf{27}, 68 (1925).

Published

2024-09-02

How to Cite

Lima, F. M. S. (2024). Two-body problem. Part I: Newtonian theory and Kepler’s laws. Physicae Organum, 9(1), 53–75. Retrieved from https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/physicae/article/view/48991