La lectoescritura del día a día en educación:

reflexiones sobre el uso de las "alfabetizaciones reales" y el "paisaje lingüístico" en la enseñanza del inglés a jóvenes sordos de la India

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v24i1.48625

Palabras clave:

real literacies, linguistic landscapes, deaf, English, India

Resumen

En este artículo analizo mi experiencia con dos proyectos de investigación-acción sobre el desarrollo de la enseñanza de la lectoescritura en inglés con jóvenes sordos en la India, Ghana y Uganda. Centrándome en la India, reflexiono sobre dos conceptos en los que nos basamos para diseñar una pedagogía comunicativa del lenguaje centrada en el alumno, "alfabetizaciones reales" (ROGERS, 1999) y "paisajes lingüísticos" (CONOZ; GORTER, 2008). Utilizamos estas perspectivas para crear conjuntamente con los estudiantes un plan de estudios basado en sus propias experiencias cotidianas con el inglés. El proyecto buscaba empoderar a los jóvenes sordos a través del desarrollo de su capacidad para comunicarse en inglés, al mismo tiempo que valorando su lengua materna -la lengua de signos-, ofreciendo así una educación bilingüe aditiva. En el artículo, analizo cómo los estudiantes y los tutores se involucraron con este enfoque, cuestionando activamente algunos de nuestros planes y sugiriendo adaptaciones de las actividades programadas. Concluyo mi artículo con algunas reflexiones sobre lo que podemos extraer de nuestra experiencia en lo que respecta a la adaptabilidad y la relevancia de las "alfabetizaciones reales" y los "paisajes lingüísticos" para el trabajo con alumnos sordos.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Uta Papen, Lancaster University

Professor of Literacy Studies in the Department of Linguistics and English Language at Lancaster University (UK). E-mail: u.papen@lancaster.ac.uk

Citas

ALADJEM, R.; JOU, B. The Linguistic Landscape as a learning space for contextual language learning. Journal of Learning Spaces, v. 5, n. 2, p. 66-70, 2016.

BEN-RAFAEL, E.; SHOHAMY, E.; AMARA, M.H.; TRUMPET-HECHT, N. Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public sphere: the case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, v. 3., n. 1, p. 7-30. 2006.

CENOZ, J.; GORTER, D. The linguistic landscape as an additional source of input in second language acquisition. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, v. 46, n. 3, p. 67–287, 2008.

CHERN, C-I; DOOLEY, K. Learning English by walking down the street. ELT Journal, v. 68, n. 2, p.113-123, 2014. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/10.1093/elt/cct067.

COPE, B.; KALANTZIS, M. ‘Multiliteracies’: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, v. 4, n. 3, p. 164–195, 2009.

GILES, R.M.; TUNKS, K.W. Children write their world: environmental print as a teaching tool. Dimension of Early Childhood, v. 38, n.3, p.23-30. 2010.

GORTER, D. Linguistic landscapes and trends in the study of schoolscapes. Linguistics and Education, v. 44, p. 80-85. 2018. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/10.1016/j.linged.2017.10.001.

HEPPLE, E.; SOCKHILL, M., TAN, A.; ALFORD, J. Multiliteracies pedagogy. Creating claymations with adolescent, post-beginner English language learners. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, v. 58, n.3, p. 219-229, 2014. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/10.1002/jaal.339.

HUEBNER, T. Linguistic landscape: history, trajectory and pedagogy. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities, Special Issue n. 22, 2016.

KIM, S.; CHESNUT, M. Teaching with virtual linguistic landscapes: developing translingual and transcultural competence. In: Malinowski, D.; Maxim, H.H. and Dubreil, S. (eds.) Language teaching in the linguistic landscape: mobilizing pedagogy in public space. Springer International Publishing AG, 2021. p. 69-92.

KUSTERS, A.; DE MEULDRR, M.; O’BRIEN, D. Innovations in deaf studies: Critically mapping the field. In: Kusters, A.; de Meulder, M. and O’Brien, D. (eds.) Innovations in deaf studies: The role of deaf scholars. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, p. 1-53.

MALINOWSKI, D.; DUBREIL, S. Linguistic landscape and language learning. In: Chapelle, C.A. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. John Wiley and Sons, 2019. p.1-6.

MALINOWSKI, D.; MAXIM, H. H.; DUBREIL, S. Introduction. In theirs (eds.) Language learning in the linguistic landscape: mobilizing pedagogy in public space. Springer International Publishing, 2021.

MILLS, K. A. Multiliteracies: interrogating competing discourses. Language and Education, v. 23, n. 3, p. 103-116, 2009. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/10.1080/09500780802152762.

NEW LONDON GROUP. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, v. 66, n. 1, p. 60-92, 1996.

NIRANTAR. Exploring the everyday: ethnographic approaches to literacy and numeracy. Delhi: Nirantar, 2007.

PAPEN, U.; GILLEN, J. Peer to Peer Deaf Multiliteracies: experiential pedagogy, agency and inclusion in working with young adults in India. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2022 (e-pub), available at: https://doi-org.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/10.1080/13603116.2022.2121433

PAPEN, U.; TUSTING, K. Using ethnography and “real literacies” to develop a curriculum for English literacy teaching for young deaf adults in India. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, v. 50, n. 8, p.1140-1158, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1585756

PAPEN, U.; ZESHAN, U. English grammar games. In: WEBSTER, J.; ZESHAN, U. (ed.) READ WRITE EASY Research, practice and innovation in deaf multiliteracies. Lancaster: Ishara Press. 2021. p. 173-200. Available at https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/52174

PÜTZ, M.; MUNDT, N.-F. (ed.) Expanding the Linguistic Landscape: Linguistic Diversity, Multimodality and the Use of Space as a Semiotic Resource. Channel View Publications. 2018.

RANDHAWA, S.P.K. A status study of selected special schools for the deaf and identification of intervention areas. PhD Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India, 2006.

RICHARDS, J. C.; RODGERS, T. S. Approaches and methods in language teaching. Third edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, chapter 5 on Communicative Language Teaching and Chapter 9 on Task-Based Language Teaching.

ROGERS, A. Improving the quality of adult literacy programmes in developing countries: the ‘real literacies’ approach. International Journal of Educational Development, v. 19, n.3, p. 19, 219–234. 1999.

ROWLAND, L. The pedagogical benefits of a linguistic landscape project in Japan. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, v. 16, n. 4, p.. 494-505.

SAYER, P. Using the linguistic landscape as a pedagogic resource. ELT Journal, v. 64, n. 2, p. 143-154. 2010. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/10.1093/elt/ccp051

STREET, B. V. 2012. Letter: Learning for Empowerment through Training in Ethnographic-Style Research. In: GRENFELL, M.; BLOOME, D.; HARDY, C.; PAHL, K.; ROWSELL, J.; STREET, B. V. (ed.) Language, Ethnography, and Education: Bridging New Literacy Studies and Bourdieu. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012, p. 73-88.

STREET, B. V.; BAKER, D.; ROGERS, A. Adult teachers as researchers: ethnographic approaches to numeracy and literacy as social practices in South Asia. Convergence, v. 39, pp. 31–44, 2006.

SWANWICK, R. Translanguaging, learning and teaching in deaf education. International Journal of Multilingualism, v. 14, n. 3, p. 233–49, 2017.DOI: https://doi-org.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315808.

Descargas

Publicado

2023-07-10

Cómo citar

Papen, U. (2023). La lectoescritura del día a día en educación: : reflexiones sobre el uso de las "alfabetizaciones reales" y el "paisaje lingüístico" en la enseñanza del inglés a jóvenes sordos de la India. Cadernos De Linguagem E Sociedade, 24(1), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v24i1.48625