EVERYDAY LITERACIES IN EDUCATION:

INSIGHTS FROM USING 'REAL LITERACIES' AND THE 'LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPE' FOR TEACHING ENGLISH TO DEAF YOUNG ADULTS IN INDIA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v24i1.48625

Keywords:

real literacies, linguistic landscapes, deaf, English, India

Abstract

In this paper I discuss the experience of two action research projects to develop English literacy teaching for deaf young adults in India, Ghana and Uganda. With a focus on India, I reflect on how we drew on two concepts, ‘real literacies’ (ROGERS,1999) and ‘linguistic landscapes’ (CONOZ; GORTER, 2008) to design a student-centred and communicative language pedagogy. We used these perspectives to co-create with students a curriculum based on their everyday uses of English. The project sought to empower deaf young people by developing their ability to communicate in English, while also valuing their first language - a sign language – thus offering an additive bilingual education. In the paper, I discuss how students and tutors engaged with the approach. They actively challenged some of our plans and asked for adaptations to our planned lesson activities. I conclude my paper with some thoughts on what to take from our experience with regards to the adaptability and relevance of ‘real literacies’ and ‘linguistic landscapes’ for work with deaf students.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Uta Papen, Lancaster University

Professor of Literacy Studies in the Department of Linguistics and English Language at Lancaster University (UK). E-mail: u.papen@lancaster.ac.uk

References

ALADJEM, R.; JOU, B. The Linguistic Landscape as a learning space for contextual language learning. Journal of Learning Spaces, v. 5, n. 2, p. 66-70, 2016.

BEN-RAFAEL, E.; SHOHAMY, E.; AMARA, M.H.; TRUMPET-HECHT, N. Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public sphere: the case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, v. 3., n. 1, p. 7-30. 2006.

CENOZ, J.; GORTER, D. The linguistic landscape as an additional source of input in second language acquisition. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, v. 46, n. 3, p. 67–287, 2008.

CHERN, C-I; DOOLEY, K. Learning English by walking down the street. ELT Journal, v. 68, n. 2, p.113-123, 2014. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/10.1093/elt/cct067.

COPE, B.; KALANTZIS, M. ‘Multiliteracies’: New literacies, new learning. Pedagogies: An International Journal, v. 4, n. 3, p. 164–195, 2009.

GILES, R.M.; TUNKS, K.W. Children write their world: environmental print as a teaching tool. Dimension of Early Childhood, v. 38, n.3, p.23-30. 2010.

GORTER, D. Linguistic landscapes and trends in the study of schoolscapes. Linguistics and Education, v. 44, p. 80-85. 2018. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/10.1016/j.linged.2017.10.001.

HEPPLE, E.; SOCKHILL, M., TAN, A.; ALFORD, J. Multiliteracies pedagogy. Creating claymations with adolescent, post-beginner English language learners. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, v. 58, n.3, p. 219-229, 2014. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/10.1002/jaal.339.

HUEBNER, T. Linguistic landscape: history, trajectory and pedagogy. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities, Special Issue n. 22, 2016.

KIM, S.; CHESNUT, M. Teaching with virtual linguistic landscapes: developing translingual and transcultural competence. In: Malinowski, D.; Maxim, H.H. and Dubreil, S. (eds.) Language teaching in the linguistic landscape: mobilizing pedagogy in public space. Springer International Publishing AG, 2021. p. 69-92.

KUSTERS, A.; DE MEULDRR, M.; O’BRIEN, D. Innovations in deaf studies: Critically mapping the field. In: Kusters, A.; de Meulder, M. and O’Brien, D. (eds.) Innovations in deaf studies: The role of deaf scholars. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, p. 1-53.

MALINOWSKI, D.; DUBREIL, S. Linguistic landscape and language learning. In: Chapelle, C.A. (ed.) The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. John Wiley and Sons, 2019. p.1-6.

MALINOWSKI, D.; MAXIM, H. H.; DUBREIL, S. Introduction. In theirs (eds.) Language learning in the linguistic landscape: mobilizing pedagogy in public space. Springer International Publishing, 2021.

MILLS, K. A. Multiliteracies: interrogating competing discourses. Language and Education, v. 23, n. 3, p. 103-116, 2009. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/10.1080/09500780802152762.

NEW LONDON GROUP. A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, v. 66, n. 1, p. 60-92, 1996.

NIRANTAR. Exploring the everyday: ethnographic approaches to literacy and numeracy. Delhi: Nirantar, 2007.

PAPEN, U.; GILLEN, J. Peer to Peer Deaf Multiliteracies: experiential pedagogy, agency and inclusion in working with young adults in India. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 2022 (e-pub), available at: https://doi-org.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/10.1080/13603116.2022.2121433

PAPEN, U.; TUSTING, K. Using ethnography and “real literacies” to develop a curriculum for English literacy teaching for young deaf adults in India. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, v. 50, n. 8, p.1140-1158, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2019.1585756

PAPEN, U.; ZESHAN, U. English grammar games. In: WEBSTER, J.; ZESHAN, U. (ed.) READ WRITE EASY Research, practice and innovation in deaf multiliteracies. Lancaster: Ishara Press. 2021. p. 173-200. Available at https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/52174

PÜTZ, M.; MUNDT, N.-F. (ed.) Expanding the Linguistic Landscape: Linguistic Diversity, Multimodality and the Use of Space as a Semiotic Resource. Channel View Publications. 2018.

RANDHAWA, S.P.K. A status study of selected special schools for the deaf and identification of intervention areas. PhD Thesis, Indian Institute of Technology, Roorkee, India, 2006.

RICHARDS, J. C.; RODGERS, T. S. Approaches and methods in language teaching. Third edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014, chapter 5 on Communicative Language Teaching and Chapter 9 on Task-Based Language Teaching.

ROGERS, A. Improving the quality of adult literacy programmes in developing countries: the ‘real literacies’ approach. International Journal of Educational Development, v. 19, n.3, p. 19, 219–234. 1999.

ROWLAND, L. The pedagogical benefits of a linguistic landscape project in Japan. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, v. 16, n. 4, p.. 494-505.

SAYER, P. Using the linguistic landscape as a pedagogic resource. ELT Journal, v. 64, n. 2, p. 143-154. 2010. https://doi-org.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/10.1093/elt/ccp051

STREET, B. V. 2012. Letter: Learning for Empowerment through Training in Ethnographic-Style Research. In: GRENFELL, M.; BLOOME, D.; HARDY, C.; PAHL, K.; ROWSELL, J.; STREET, B. V. (ed.) Language, Ethnography, and Education: Bridging New Literacy Studies and Bourdieu. Abingdon: Routledge, 2012, p. 73-88.

STREET, B. V.; BAKER, D.; ROGERS, A. Adult teachers as researchers: ethnographic approaches to numeracy and literacy as social practices in South Asia. Convergence, v. 39, pp. 31–44, 2006.

SWANWICK, R. Translanguaging, learning and teaching in deaf education. International Journal of Multilingualism, v. 14, n. 3, p. 233–49, 2017.DOI: https://doi-org.ezproxy.lancs.ac.uk/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315808.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-10

How to Cite

Papen, U. (2023). EVERYDAY LITERACIES IN EDUCATION: : INSIGHTS FROM USING ’REAL LITERACIES’ AND THE ’LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPE’ FOR TEACHING ENGLISH TO DEAF YOUNG ADULTS IN INDIA. Papers of Language and Society, 24(1), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v24i1.48625