A constituição do discurso formal no tribunal do júri
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v14i2.9218Keywords:
formality, judicial discourse, trial court.Abstract
We aimed to analyze the constitution of formal discourse in a trial court so as to set up its constitutive parameters based upon the speeches given by prosecutors and defense attorneys. The very choice of this scenario can be explained due to the accomplishment of several formal rules of procedures taken in this place. It is a qualitatively oriented research built on interactional sociolinguistics with ethnographic orientation, coupled up with oral speech analysis. To this end, a video-recording session was carried out at the Federal District Court, comprising approximately 11 hours.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
ATKINSON, J. M. The British journal of sociology. v. 13, n.1, mar, 1982. pp. 86-117.
BAUMAN, Z. Identidade: entrevista à Benedetto Vecchi. Rio de Janeiro: J. Zahar Editor, 2005.
BRANDÃO, C. Do discurso formal para o informal: um estudo de variação estilística no meio acadêmico. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade de Brasília: Brasília, 1997.
BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Congresso Nacional: Brasília, 1988.
BIRDWHISTELL, R.L. Kinesics and context: essays on body motion communication. 4.ed. Philadelphia: UPP (University of Pensylvania Press), 1985.
CASTELLES, M. O poder da Identidade. Vol 2. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1999.
CUNHA, C.; CINTRA, L. Nova Gramática do português contemporâneo. 5ª edição. Rio de Janeiro: Lexikon, 2008.
DURANTI, A. Linguistic Antropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
ERVIN-TRIPP, S. M. (1972). Alternation and co-occurrence. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 218-250.
FIGUEROA, E. Sociolinguistics Methateory. New York: Pergamon, 1994.
GARFINKEL, H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge England: Polity Press, 1984.
GUMPERZ, J. Communicative Competence. In: COUPLAND, Nikolas and Jaworski (eds.). Sociolinguistics: a reader and coursebook. England: Palgrave, 1997.
HUTCHBY, I. & WOOFFITT, R. Conversation Analysis: principles, practices and applications. USA: Blackwell Publishers Inc., 2001.
IRVINE, J. “Formality and Informality in speech events”. In Sociolinguistic working paper. n. 52, Austin Texas, Southwest Development Laboratory, 21p. 1978.
MAGALHÃES, M.C.C. Etnografia Colaborativa e desenvolvimento do professor. Campinas (23), Jan/Jul, 1994.
MELO, W. Discurso Formal no Tribunal do Júri: estratégias argumentativointeracionais. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade de Brasília ”“ UnB: Brasília, 2011.
OCHS, E. Planned and unplanned discourse. In: GIVON, T. (ed). Syntax and semantics. Vol. 12, p.51-79. Discourse and syntax. New York. Academic Press, 1979.
VAN DIJK, T. A. Discourse as Social Interaction. In: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. v. 2: London: SAGE Publications, 1998.
BAUMAN, Z. Identidade: entrevista à Benedetto Vecchi. Rio de Janeiro: J. Zahar Editor, 2005.
BRANDÃO, C. Do discurso formal para o informal: um estudo de variação estilística no meio acadêmico. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade de Brasília: Brasília, 1997.
BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil. Congresso Nacional: Brasília, 1988.
BIRDWHISTELL, R.L. Kinesics and context: essays on body motion communication. 4.ed. Philadelphia: UPP (University of Pensylvania Press), 1985.
CASTELLES, M. O poder da Identidade. Vol 2. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 1999.
CUNHA, C.; CINTRA, L. Nova Gramática do português contemporâneo. 5ª edição. Rio de Janeiro: Lexikon, 2008.
DURANTI, A. Linguistic Antropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.
ERVIN-TRIPP, S. M. (1972). Alternation and co-occurrence. In J. J. Gumperz & D. Hymes (Eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, pp. 218-250.
FIGUEROA, E. Sociolinguistics Methateory. New York: Pergamon, 1994.
GARFINKEL, H. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge England: Polity Press, 1984.
GUMPERZ, J. Communicative Competence. In: COUPLAND, Nikolas and Jaworski (eds.). Sociolinguistics: a reader and coursebook. England: Palgrave, 1997.
HUTCHBY, I. & WOOFFITT, R. Conversation Analysis: principles, practices and applications. USA: Blackwell Publishers Inc., 2001.
IRVINE, J. “Formality and Informality in speech events”. In Sociolinguistic working paper. n. 52, Austin Texas, Southwest Development Laboratory, 21p. 1978.
MAGALHÃES, M.C.C. Etnografia Colaborativa e desenvolvimento do professor. Campinas (23), Jan/Jul, 1994.
MELO, W. Discurso Formal no Tribunal do Júri: estratégias argumentativointeracionais. Dissertação de Mestrado. Universidade de Brasília ”“ UnB: Brasília, 2011.
OCHS, E. Planned and unplanned discourse. In: GIVON, T. (ed). Syntax and semantics. Vol. 12, p.51-79. Discourse and syntax. New York. Academic Press, 1979.
VAN DIJK, T. A. Discourse as Social Interaction. In: Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. v. 2: London: SAGE Publications, 1998.
Downloads
Published
2013-06-28
How to Cite
Brandão, C., & Melo, W. (2013). A constituição do discurso formal no tribunal do júri. Papers of Language and Society, 14(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v14i2.9218
Issue
Section
Artigos de pesquisa
