Understanding and Involvement with Art from the Second-Person Perspective

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v9i1.41039

Keywords:

Empathy. Simulation. Postcognitivism. Social Cognition. Expression.

Abstract

This paper shows that the second-person perspective of mental attribution (Pérez 2013 and Pérez and Gomila 2021) can contribute to illuminate our understanding and involvement with art. A canonical way of understanding our involvement with art focuses on the notion of empathy, which is also considered a central notion to account for our access to other minds. In the first part of this paper, I briefly review this notion and I connect it with recent works in the field of philosophy of art in which a simulationist theory is adopted, both to account for our understanding of other people’s minds and for understanding aesthetic experiences. Secondly, I show the limitations that these notions (empathy and simulation) have to account for our understanding and involvement both with other human beings and with art and I briefly expose the central thesis of the second person perspective of psychological attribution. Finally, I show why the second-person perspective is more adequate to account for the many and multifaceted experiences that arise with art and artistic activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Diana I. Pérez, Universidad de Buenos Aires

Profesora Titular. Departamento de Filosofía. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras de la Universidad de Buenos Aires. Investigadora Principal IIF-SADAF-CONICET.

References

BRINCK, I. y REDDY, V. (2020) “Dialogue in the making: emotional engagement with materials”. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science. 19: 23-45.

COPLAN, A. y GOLDIE, P. (2011)Empathy. Philosophical and Psychological Perspectives. OUP.

CURRIE, G. (1995) “Imagination as simulation: Aesthetics meets cognitive science”. In DAVIES, Martin STONE, Tony (eds.), Mental Simulation. Blackwell (1995).

CURRIE, G. RAVENSCROFT, I. (2002)Recreative Minds: Imagination in Philosophy and Psychology. OUP.

DE JAEGHER, H. DI PAOLO, E. (2007) “Participatory sense-making”.Phenomenology and Cognitive Science6: 485-507.

DISSANAYAKE, E. (2000). “Antecedents of the temporal arts in early mother-infant interaction”. En N. L. Wallin, B.Merker y S. Brown (Eds.).The Origins of Music. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

ESPAÑOL, S. (2014). La forma repetición variación. Una estrategia para la reciprocidad. En S. Español (comp.)Psicologíade la música y del desarrollo. Una exploración interdisciplinaria sobre la musicalidad humana(pp. 157-192). BuenosAires: Paidós.

ESPAÑOL, S. y PÉREZ, D. “Los juegos, los contrastes, las artes”.Boletín de Estética, 33, 2015, pp- 5-40. ISSN 2408-4417

FREEDBERG, D. and GALLESE, V. (2007) “Motion, emotion and empathy in esthetic experience” TRENDS in cognitive science, Vo. 11, no. 5: 197:203

GALLAGHER, S. (2001). “The Practice of Mind: Theory, Simulation or Interaction”. En E. Thompson (Ed.).BetweenOurselves. Second-person Issues in the Study of Consciousness. Imprint Academic, pp. 83-108.

GALLAGHER, S. (2007) “Logical and phenomenological arguments against simulation theory”. In HUTTO, D. RAT-CLIFFE, M. (eds.) Folk Psychology Re-assessed. Springer, pp. 63-78.GALLESE, V.; FADIGA, L.; FOGASSI, L.; RIZZOLATTI, Giacomo (1996). "Action recognition in the premotor cortex".Brain. 119 (2): 593–609.

GALLESE, V., GOLDMAN, A. “Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading”.Trends Cogn. Sci.1998 Dec1; 2(12): 493-501. doi: 10.1016/s1364-6613(98)01262-5. PMID: 21227300.

GALLESE, V. (2005) “Embodied simulation: From neurons to phenomenal experience” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences (2005) 4: 23–48.

GALLESE, V. (2010) “Mirror neurons and art” BACCI, F. MELCHER, D. (eds.) Art and the Senses. OUP, Oxford.

GALLESE, V. (2017) “Visions of the body. Embodied simulation and aesthetic experience” Aisthesis10 (1): 41:50.

GELL, A. (1998/2016) Arte y Agencia. Una teoría antropológica. SB Editorial, Buenos Aires.

GOLDMAN, A. (1993) “The Psychology of Folk Psychology”.Behavioral and Brain Sciences16 (1):15.28.

GOLDMAN, A. (2006) Simulating Minds. OUP, Oxford.

GOMILA, A. (2001) “La perspectiva de segunda persona: mecanismos mentales de la intersubjetividad”.Contrastes6:65-86.

GOMILA, A. (2009) “Musical expression and the second person perspective”. In ALVAREZ, I.; PÉREZ, F. PÉREZ, H.(eds.)Expression in the performing arts. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp. 66-85.

GOMILA, A. (2013) “Las emociones en el teatro: ¿por qué nos involucramos emocionalmente con una representación?”In SORIA TOMÁS, G. (ed.)La representación de las pasiones: perspectivas artísticas, filosóficas y científicas. Madrid:Dykinson, pp. 57-78.

LIPPS, T. (1924)Fundamentos de la estética. Ed. D. Jorro, Madrid.

MALLOCH, S. y TREVARTHEN, C. (2009) “Musicality: Communicating the vitality and interests of life”. En S. MA-LLOCH y C. TREVARTHEN, C. (Eds).Communicative musicality: Exploring the basis of human companionship. Ox-ford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-11.

MARTÍNEZ, I.C., ESPAÑOL, S.A. PÉREZ, D.I. “The Interactive Origin and the Aesthetic Modelling of Image-Schemasand Primary Metaphors” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science2018 Dec; 52(4): 646-671.

MATÍNEZ, I.C. (2021) Dossier. La segunda persona y la música.El oído pensante. Vol. 9 Núm. 2 (2021): Septiembre 2021- Febrero 2022: 9-158.

PÉREZ, D. GOMILA, A. (2021).The second person: Social cognition in human interactio. London: Routledge.

PÉREZ, D. (2018a) “Filosofia, Ciencias Cognitivas y Sentido Común: el caso de la segunda persona de la atribuciónmental”,Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporanea, Brasilia, v.6, n.1, p. 49-72 49 ISSN: 2317-9570.

PÉREZ, D. (2018b) “A expressão das emoções e a segunda pessoa (ou quanto podemos saber da mente do outro atravésde sua expressão)”, Debates contemporaneos em filosofia da mente. Leal Toledo, G. Gouvea, R y Alves, M. (eds.) Editorial FiloCzar, San Pablo, Brasil, 2018, pp. 19-94.

PÉREZ, D. (2014) "Conceptos de primera persona" en SMITH, P. J.; SILVA FILHO, W. J.; SANTOS, P. (orgs.), Crença, verdade, racionalidade: ensaios de filosofia analítica, Salvador: EDUFBA, pp. 15-36 .

PÉREZ, D. (2013). Sentir, desear, creer. Una aproximación filosófica a los conceptos psicológicos. Buenos Aires: Prometeo.

PÉREZ, D. (2011) "Phenomenal concepts, color experience, and Mary’s puzzle", Teorema. XXX/3 pp. 113-133. ISSN0210- 1602.

REDDY, V. (2008). How infants know mind. London: Harvard University Press.

RIZZOLATTI, G.; FADIGA, L.; GALLESE, V.; FOGASSI, L. (1996). "Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions". Cognitive Brain Research. 3 (2): 131–141.

SCOTTO, C. (2002) “Interacción y atribución mental: la perspectiva de la segunda persona”. Análisis Filosófico 22(2): 135-151.

STERN, D. (2010). Forms of vitality. Exploring dynamic experience in psychology, the arts, psychotherapy and development. New York: Oxford University Press.

WALTON, K. (2015)In Other Shoes. Music, Metaphor, Empathy, Existence. OUP.

Published

2021-12-08

How to Cite

PÉREZ, Diana I. Understanding and Involvement with Art from the Second-Person Perspective. Journal of Modern and Contemporary Philosophy, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 145–163, 2021. DOI: 10.26512/rfmc.v9i1.41039. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/fmc/article/view/41039. Acesso em: 19 may. 2024.