Act, content and object bei Frege, Stout and Moore

Authors

  • Mario Ariel González Porta Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUC-SP

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v3i2.12507

Keywords:

Frege, Stout, Moore, Content-object

Abstract

It is well known that the discussion concerning the relations between content and object is a central theme in Brentano’s school after the decisive essay by Twardowski in 1894. However, less known is the fact that this discussion also takes place outside the aforementioned school and that the distinction between content and object is already present before 1893 amongst other authors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Mario Ariel González Porta, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo - PUC-SP

Possui graduação em Filosofia pela Universidade Maior da República de Montevidéu (1980) e doutorado em Filosofia - Universitat Munster (Westfalische-Wilhelms) (1989). Atualmente é professor titular da Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Tem experiência na área de Filosofia, com ênfase em Epistemologia, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: origens da filosofía contemporânea, Kant, neokantismo, fenomenologia, psicologismo e ensino da filosofia.

References

FREGE, G. Begriffsschrift. Eine der arithmetischen nachgebildeten Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. In:Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze. 2da. ed. Ignacio Angelelli (ed.). Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1971. pp. 1-88.

_______. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Hamburg: Meiner, 1988. (GA)

_______. Grundgesetze der Arithmetik. Jena: Pohl, 1893. (GGA)

_______. Logik (1897). In: Gabriel, GOTTFRIED (org.). Schriften zur Logik und Sprachphilosophie. Aus dem Nachlass.3.Aufl. Hamburg: Meiner, 1980.

_______. Der Gedanke. In:FREGE, G. Logische Untersuchungen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1986.

_____. Besprechung Husserl’s Philosophie der Arithmetik. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik NF 103: 313-332, 1892.

_______. Begriff und Gegenstand, In: PAT Z I G, G. ( o r g. ) Funktion, Begriff, Bedeutung. Gottingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1966.

GONZÁLEZ PORTA, M. A. A crítica de Frege ao idealismo en ‘Der Gedanke’. Veritas54: 130-154, 2009.

_______. La evolución de la crítica fregueana al psicologismo. Veritas57: 99-122, 2012.

_______. Freges Logik von 1897 und die Subjektfrage. Phainomenon22-23: 31-66, 2014.

_______. Crítica al psicologismo y concepción de subjetividad en Frege. Manuscrito37: 1-57, 2014.

H O P P E , E . R E . Re z e n s i o n d e r Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Archiv der Mathematik und Physik. 2.Reihe. Teil II, Heft III: 28-35, 1885.

HUSSERL, E. Philosophie der Arithmetik.Hamburg: Meiner, 1992.

KERRY, B. Über Anschauung und ihre psychische Verarbeitung. Vierter Artikel. Vierteljahresschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 11: 249-307, 1887.

MOORE, G. E. Mr. Mc Taggart’s “Studies in Hegelian Cosmology”. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society n.s. 2: 177-214, 1901-1902 (também em: The Early Essays, pp. 147-185).

_______. The refutation of idealism. Mind48: 433-453, 1903. (também em: Philosophical Studies, pp. 1-30).

_______. Philosophical Studies. London: Kegan Paul, Trench Trubner, 1922.

_______. The Early Essays. Tom Regan (ed.). Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1896.

_______. Selected Writings. Thomas Baldwin (ed.). 1a. ed. 1993. London/New York: Routledge, 2013.

PRETI, C. On the origins of the contemporary notion of propositional content: antipsychologism in nineteenth century psychology and G. E. Moore’s early theory of judgment. Stud. Hist. Phil. Sci., d o i 1 0 . 1 0 1 6 / j . s h p s a .20089.03.002.

PECKHAUS, V. Benno Kerry. Beiträge zu seiner Biographie. History and Philosophie of Logik15: 1-8, 1994.

PICARDI, E. Kerry und Frege über Begriff und Gegenstand, History and Philosophy of Logik15: 9-32, 1994.

ROLLINGER R. D. Brentano’s Psychology and Logic and the Basis of Twardowski’s Theory of presentations.The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication4: 1-23, 2009.

STOUT, G. F. The Philosophy of Mr. Shadworth Hodgson. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society2: 107-120, 1892.

_______. Analytic Psychology. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd. / New York: T he Macmillan Company (Forgotten Books), 1896.

VAN DER SCHAAR, M. G. F. Stout and the psychological origins of analytic philosophy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.

How to Cite

GONZÁLEZ PORTA, Mario Ariel. Act, content and object bei Frege, Stout and Moore. Journal of Modern and Contemporary Philosophy, [S. l.], v. 3, n. 2, p. 06–15, 2016. DOI: 10.26512/rfmc.v3i2.12507. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/fmc/article/view/12507. Acesso em: 2 oct. 2024.