'Epistemologia Naturalizada' e o Círculo de Viena
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v8i2.35867Palavras-chave:
Epistemologia naturalista. Empirismo lógico. Quine. Carnap. Neurath.Resumo
Este artigo analisa o início da epistemologia naturalista de W.V.O. Quine, no 14o Congresso Internacional de Filosofia em Viena, em 1969 e argumenta que, ao contrário de suas sugestões, a epistemologia naturalista já era praticada no Círculo de Viena no tempo em que ele o visitava, recém-saído da pós-graduação.
Downloads
Referências
CARNAP, Rudolf. Der logische Aufbau der Welt. Berlin: Weltkreisverlag, 1928.
______The Logical Structure of the World. Pseudoproblems in Philosophy, University of California Press, 1967.
______. Die logizistische Grundlegung der Mathematik, Erkenntnis 2: 91-105, 1931. (Trans. in P. Bernacerraf and H. Putnam (eds.), The Philosophy of Mathematics. Selected Readings, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1964, pp. 31-41)
______. Über Protokollsätze, Erkenntnis 3: 215-228, 1932. (Trans. “On Protocol Sentences” in Nous 21: 457”“470.)
______. Logische Syntax der Sprache. Vienna: Springer, 1934a. (Rev. ed. transl. The Logical Syntax of Language, London: Kegan, Paul, Trench Teubner & Cie, 1937, repr. Chicago: Open Court, 2002.)
______. Die Aufgabe der Wissenschaftslogik , Vienna: Gerold, 1934a. (Transl. “The Task of the Logic of Science” in B. McGuiness (ed.), 1987, Unified Science, Dordrecht: Reidel, 1987, pp. 46-66.)
______. On the Character of Philosophic Problems. Philosophy of Science 1: 5-19, 1934c. (Repr. in R. Rorty (ed.), The Lingusitic Turn. Essays in Philosophical Method, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967, pp. 54-62.)
______. Von der Erkenntnistheorie zur Wissenschaftslogik. Actes du Congress Internationale de Philosophie Scientifique, Sorbonne, Paris 1935, Facs. I “Philosophie Scientifique et Empirisme Logique”, Paris: Herman & Cie, pp. 36-41, 1936a.
______. Wahrheit und Bewährung. Actes du Congres Internationale de Philosophie Scientifique, Sorbonne, Paris 1935, Facs. IV, “Induction et Probabilité”, Paris: Hermann & Cie., pp. 18-23, 1936b.
______. Truth and Confirmation.” In Readings in Philosophical Analysis, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 119-227, 1949.
______. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950.
______. Meaning and Synonomy in Natural Language. Philosophical Studies 6: 33-47, 1955. (Repr. in Carnap, Meaning and Necessity, 2nd ed. with supplementary essays, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1956, pp. 233-247.)
______. Comments and Replies. In P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, LaSalle: Open Court., pp. 859-1016, 1963.
CARUS, André. Carnap and Twentieth Century Thought: Explication as Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007.
CREATH, Richard. Quine on the Intelligibility and Relevance of the Analyticity. In R. Gibson (ed.) Cambridge Companion to Quine, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press, pp. 47-64, 2004.
EBBS, Gary. Rule-Following and Realism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997.
______. Carnap’s Logical Syntax. In R. Gaskin (ed.), Grammar in Early Twentieth Century Philosophy, London: Routledge, pp. 218-237, 2001. (Repr. in Ebbs, Carnap, Quine and Putnam on Methods of Inquiry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13-32.)
FRANK, Philipp. Philosophy of Science. The Bridge Between Philosophy and Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1957. (Repr. Minola: Dover, 2004.)
FRIEDMAN, Michael. Carnap’s Aufbau Reconsidered. Nous 21: 521-45, 1987. (Repr. in Friedman, Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 89-113, 1999.
______. Epistemology in the Aufbau. Synthese 93: 15-57, 1992. (Repr. with postscript in Friedman, Reconsidering Logical Positivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 114-164, 1999)
GALLIE, W. B. Essentially Contested Concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 56: 167-198, 1955-56. (Repr. in Gallie, Philosophy and the Historical Understanding, London: Chatto & Windus, 1964.)
HALLER, Rudolf. Die philosophische Entwicklung im Österreich der Fünfzigerjahre, Manuskripte 23: 57-68, 1983. (Repr. in Haller, Fragen zu Wittgenstein und Aufsätze zur Österreichischen Philosophie, Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 219-245, 1986.)
HEMPEL Carl Gustav. Schlick und Neurath: Fundierung vs. Kohärenz in der Wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis. Grazer Philosophische Studien 16-17: 1-18, 1982. (Trans. “Schlick and Neurath: Foundations and Coherence in Scientific Knowledge”, in Hempel, Selected Philosophical Essays (ed. by R. Jeffreys), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 181-198, 2000.)
KIM, Jaegwon. What is Naturalized Epistemology? Philosophical Perspectives 2: 381-405, 1988.
KOPPELBERG, Dirk. Die Aufhebung der Analytischen Philosophie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1987.
______. How and Why to Naturalize Epistemology. In Perspectives on Quine, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 200-211, 1990.
MAFFIE, James. Recent Work on naturalistic Epistemology, American Philosophical Quarterly 27: 281-293, 1990a.
______. Naturalism and the Normativity of Epistemology, Philosophical Studies 59: 333-349, 1990b.
NEURATH, Otto, Soziologie im Physikalismus, Erkenntnis 2: 393-431, 1932a. (trans. “Sociology and Physicalism” in A. J. Ayer (ed.), Logical Positivism, New York: Free Press, 1959, pp. 282-320, and “Sociology in the Framework of Physicalism” in Neurath, Philosophical Papers 1913-1946 (ed. by R.S. Cohen and M. Neurath), Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983, pp. 58-90.)
______. Protokollsätze. Erkenntnis 3: 204-14, 1932b. (Trans. “Protocol Sentences” in A. J. Ayer (ed.), Logical Positivism, New York: Free Press, 1959, pp. 199-208, and “Protocol Statements” in Neurath, Philosophical Papers 1913-1946 (ed. by R.S. Cohen and M. Neurath), Dordrecht: Reidel, 1983, pp. 91-99.)
______. Physikalismus und Erkenntnisforschung. NI 2: 97-105 and 234-237, 1936. (Trans. “Physicalism and the Investigation of Knowledge” in Neurath, Philosophical Papers 1913-1946 (ed. by R.S. Cohen and M. Neurath), Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 159-166 and 168-171, 1983.)
PASSMORE, John. Logical Positivism. In P. Edwards et al (eds.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy Vol. 5, New York: Macmillan and The Free Press, pp. 52-57, 1967.
PUTNAM, Hilary. Why Reason Can’t Be Naturalized. Synthese 52: 3-24, 1982. (Repr. in Putnam, Philosophical Papers Vol. 3, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 229-47, 1983.
QUINE, W.V.O. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. Philosophical Review 60: 20-43, 1951. (Repr. in Quine, From a Logical Point of View, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1953, rev. ed. 1980, 20-46.)
______.Carnap and Logical Truth. In P.A. Schilpp (ed.), The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, LaSalle: Open Court. pp. 385-406, 1963.
______. Epistemology Naturalized. In Quine, Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 69-90, 1969.
______. Theories and Things. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1981.
______. Response to Morton G. White. In E. Hahn and P. Schilpp (eds.), The Philosohy of W.V.O. Quine, LaSalle, Ill.: Open Court, pp. 662-666, 1986.
______. Naturalism; or, Living within one’s Means.,Dialectica 49: 251-261, 1990a. (Repr. in Quine 2004, pp. 275-286.)
______. The Pursuit of Truth. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1990.
______. Two Dogmas in Retrospect. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 21: 265-74, 1991. (Repr. in Quine 2004, pp. 54-64.)
______. From Stimulus to Science. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1995.
_____. Quintessence (ed. by R. Gibson). Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univeristy Press, 2004.
REISCH, George. Did Kuhn Kill Logical Empiricism? Philosophy of Science 58: 264-277, 1991.
RICHARDSON, Alan. From Epistemology to the Logic of Science: Objectivity and Empiricism.” In R. Giere and A. Richardson (eds.), 1996, Origins of Logical Empiricism, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 309-322, 1966.
______. Carnap’s Construction of the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
RYSIEW, Patrick. Naturalism in Epistemology, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,2016. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2020/entries/epistemology-naturalized/>.
UEBEL Thomas. Neurath’s Programme for Naturalistic Epistemology. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 22: 623-46, 1991.
______. Logical Empiricism and Sociology of Knowledge: The Cse of Neurath and Frank, Philosophy of Science 67: S138-S150.
______. Empiricism at the Crossroads. The Vienna Circle’s Protocol Sentence Debate. Chicago: Open Court, 2007.
______. Neurath’s Protocol Statements Revisited: Sketch of a Theory of Scientific Testimony. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40: 4-13, 2009.
______. Logical Positivism””Logical Empiricism: What’s in a Name? Perspectives on Science 21: 58-99, 2013a.
______. Pragmatics in Carnap and Morris and the Bipartite Metatheory Conception. Erkenntnis 78: 523-546, 2013b
______. Three Challenges to the Complementarity of the Logic and the Pragmatics of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 53: 23-32, 2015.
______. Carnap’s Transformation of Epistemology and the Development of his Metaphilosophy. The Monist 101: 367-387, 2018.
VERHAEGH Sander. Working From Within. The Nature and Development of Quine’s Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos da primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude dos artigos aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.
