Harald Høffding e as Raízes Históricas do Conceito Bohriano de Símbolo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/rfmc.v8i2.35863Palavras-chave:
Analogia. Niels Bohr. Harald Høffding. Símbolo.Resumo
Neste artigo analizamos as raízes históricas do conceito bohriano de símbolo. Mais precisamente, afirmamos que Bohr toma elementos kantianos da filosofia de Høffding com a intenção de desenvolver seu próprio conceito de símbolo. Para esse propósito, primeiramente, nos focamos nos dois sentidos diferentes que Bohr oferece ao conceito de símbolo. Depois, estudamos como cada um desses sentidos está relacionado a diferentes aspectos da filosofia de Høffding e mostramos a conexão entre o conceito bohriano e o kantiano de símbolo por meio da mediação de Høffding.
Downloads
Referências
BOHR, N. Chemistry and The Quantum Theory of Atomic Constitution in Causality and Complementarity. The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, vol. IV, Faye, J. and Folse, H. (eds.). Ox Bow, Woodbridge, Connecticut, 1998
______. Atomic Theory and the Description of Nature. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1934.
______. Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1958.
______ Causality and Complementarity. The Philosophical Writings of Niels Bohr, vol. IV, Faye, J. and Folse, H. (eds.), Ox Bow, Woodbridge, Connecticut, 1998.
CASSIRER, E. Determinism and Indeterminism in Modern Physics, Benfey, T. (trans.), Yale University Press: New Haven and London, 1956.
CHRISTIANSEN, F. Heinrich Hertz’s Neo-Kantian Philosophy of Science and its Development by Harald Høffding. Journal for General Philosophy of Science, 37, pp. 1 -20, 2006.
D’AGOSTINO, S. The Bild Conception of Physical Theory: Helmholtz, Hertz, and Schrodinger. Physics in Perspective 6, pp. 372”“389, 2004
DARRIGOL, O. From C-numbers to Q-numbers. The Classical Analogy in the History of Quantum Theory. University of California Press: Berkeley, 1992.
FAVRHOLDT, D. Niels’s Bohr Philosophical Background. Historisk-filosofiske Meddeleser, 63. The Royal Danish Academy of Sciences and Letters, Copenhagen, 1992.
FAYE, J. Niels Bohr: His Heritage and Legacy. An Anti-Realist View of Quantum Mechanics. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1991.
FERRARI M. Sources for the History of the Concept of Symbol from Leibniz to Cassirer in Symbol and Physical Knowledge. Springer: Berlin, 2002.
FERRARI, M., STAMATESCU, I.-O. (eds.) Symbol and Physical Knowledge. Springer: Berlin, 2002.
GÓMEZ, R. Resonancias kantianas en el pensamiento de Bohr. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofía, XIII, pp. 3 ”“ 23, 1987.
HELMHOLTZ, H. Epistemological Writings. The Paul Hertz & Moritz Schlick Centenary Edition of 1921, with Notes and Commentary by the Editors, Cohen, B. (ed.), Low, M. (trans.). Reidel, Dordrecht, 1977.
HERTZ, H. The Principles of Mechanics. Dover: New York, 1956
HEISENBERG, W. The physical principles of the quantum theory. Mineola: Dover, 1949
HØFFDING , H. Die Kontinuität in philosophischen Entwicklungsgange Kants. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie, VII, pp. 173 ”“ 192, 1984.
______. A History of Modern Philosophy. A Sketch of the History of Philosophy from the Close of the Renaissance to Our Own Days, 2 vols., Macmillan, London, 1900.
______. On Analogy and its Philosophical Importance. Mind, 14, pp. 199 ”“ 209, 1905.
______. Moderne Philosophen. Vorlesungen gehalten an der Universität in Kopenhagen im Herbst 1902, Reisland, Leipzig, 1905b.
______. Der Menschliche Gedanke, Reisland, Leipzig, 1911.
______. Der Begriff der Analogie. Reisland, Leipzig, 1923.
______. La relativité philosophique. Alcan, Paris, 1924.
HONNER, J. The Description of Nature. Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987.
KANT, I. Kants gesammelte Schriften (AA). Königlichen Preußischen (Deutschen) Akademie der Wissenschaften: Berlin. 1902 ff.
______. Critique of Pure Reason Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1998.
______. Theoretical Philosophy after 1781. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 2002.
MACH, E. Erkenntnis und Irrtum, Barth, Leipzig, 1926.
MAXWELL, J. C. The Scientific Papers. Niven, W. (ed.) (1965), Dover, New York, 1890.
PRINGE, H. Critique of the Quantum Power of Judgment. A Transcendental Foundation of Quantum Objectivity. de Gruyter, Berlín, 2007.
______. Cassirer and Bohr on intuitive and symbolic knowledge in quantum physics. Theoria, 81, p. 417-429, 2014.
ROSENFELD, L., RUD NIELSEN, J., RÜDINGER, E., AASERUD, F. (eds.) Bohr’s Collected Works (BCW). North-Holland, Amsterdam; American Elsevier, New York, 1972.
STOLZENBURG, K. Die Entwicklung des Bohrschen Komplementaritätsgedankes in den Jahren 1924 bis 1929, Ph.D. Thesis, Universität Stuttgart (Technische Hochschule), Stuttgart, 1977.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2020 Revista de Filosofia Moderna e Contemporânea
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Direitos Autorais para artigos publicados nesta revista são do autor, com direitos da primeira publicação para a revista. Em virtude dos artigos aparecerem nesta revista de acesso público, os artigos são de uso gratuito, com atribuições próprias, em aplicações educacionais e não-comerciais.
