Quo vadis ecolinguistics

Authors

  • Peter Mühlhäusler Linacre College University of Oxford and University of Adelaide

Abstract

The genre of this paper is aalpiri (Australian Western Desert languages for 'morning growl') and it spells out the reasons why have been less than happy with the way ecolinguistics has developed in recent years. In my opinion, ecolinguistics does not live up to the expectations of its founders and the whole enterprise is far less than the sum of its parts. Much of ecolinguistics is driven by ideology rather than rigid scholarly research and its efficacy leaves much to be desired. The title suggests that ecolinguists have to reflect on where they are going.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Peter Mühlhäusler, Linacre College University of Oxford and University of Adelaide

O professor Peter Mühlhäusler é aposentado como Foundation Professor of Linguistics da Universidade de Adelaide, Austrália. Alemão de nascimento, estudou em Stellenbosch, Reading e na Australian National University. Lecionou na Universidade de Oxford. Suas principais áreas de interesse são: línguas crioulas e pidgins, línguas indígenas da Austrália, gramática dos pronomes e ecolinguística. Mühlhäusler é autor de um dos primeiros manuais de introdução à crioulística (Pidgin and creole linguistics, 1986), de dois dos primeiros livros sobre língua e meio ambiente: Greenspeak: A study of environmental discourse (1999), juntamente com Rom Harré e Jens Brockmeier, e Language of environment - Environment of language: A course in ecolinguistics, 2003). É coautor (com Stephen Wurm e Tyron Darrell) do monumental Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas (1996). Tem colaborado com grande parte das coletâneas de crioulística/pidginística e de ecolinguística. Ele está presente na grande antologia de ecolinguística organizada por Alwin Fill e Hermine Penz, intitulada Handbook of ecolinguistics (Routledge, 2017). ECO-REBEL já publicou dois artigos dele, em tradução portuguesa. Devido a suas pesquisas de campo nas ilhas de Norfolk, tem contribuído também com as etnociências, mais especificamente, com a etnoecologia linguística, ou seja, o estudo dos nomes para espécimes da flora e da fauna em comunidades tradicionais.

References

Harris, R. (1981). The Language Myth. Duckworth: London.
Idström, A. & Piirainen, E. (Eds.). (2012). Endangered metaphors. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Jung, M. (1996). Ökologische Sprachkritik. In: A. Fill (Ed.), Sprachökologie und Ökolinguistik (pp. 149-173). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Ketteman, B. & Penz, H. (Eds.). (2000). ECOnstructing Language, Nature and Society. The Ecolinguistic Project Revisited. Essays in Honour of Alwin Fill. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Korzybski, A. (1933). Science and Sanity. Lancaster P.A.: The Science Press Printing Company.
Lorenz, K. (1973). Die Rückseite des Spiegels - Versuch einer Naturgeschichte menschlichen Erkennens. München: Piper
Lorenz, K. (1982). Die acht Todsiinden der zivilisierten Menschheit. Miinchen: Piper.
Lovelock, J. (1988) The Ages of Gaia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marko, G. (2000). Go Veggie! A Critical Discourse Analysis ofa Text for Vegetarian Beginners. In B. Ketteman & H. Penz (Eds.), ECOnstructing Language, Nature and Society. The Ecolinguistic Project Revisited. Essays in Honour of Alwin Fill (pp. 217-240). Tübingen: Stauffenburg.
Mühlhäusler, P. (1983). Talking About Environmental Issues. Language and Communication, 3(1), 71-81.
Mühlhäusler, P. (1995). Metaphors others live by. Language and Communication, 15 (3), 281-288.
Mühlhäusler, P. (1996). Linguistic adaptation to changed environmental conditions: Some lessons from the past. In A. Fill (Ed.) Sprachökologie und Ökolinguistik (pp. 105-130). Tiibingen: Stauffenburg.
Mühlhäusler, P. (1997). Language Ecology: Contact Without Conflict. In: Martin Pütz (Ed.) Language Choices: Conditions, Constraints, and Consequences (pp. 3-15). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Mühlhäusler, P. (2000). Bleached Language on Unbleached Paper: The Language of Ecotourism. In B. Ketteman & H. Penz (Eds.), ECOnstructing Language, Nature and Society. The Ecolinguistic Project Revisited. Essays in Honour of Alwin Fill (pp. 241-253). Tubingen: Stauffenburg Verlag.
Mühlhäusler, P. (2003). Language of Environment: Environment of Language. London: Battlebridge Publications.
Mühlhäusler, P. (2006). Naming languages, drawing language boundaries and maintaining languages, with special reference to the linguistic situation in Papua New Guinea. In: D. Cunningham, D. E. Ingram & K. Sumbuk (Eds.), Language diversity in the Pacific: Endangerment and survival (pp. 24-39). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Mühlhäusler, P. & Peace, A. (2006). Environmental Discourses. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 457-479
Mühlhäusler, P. & Damania, R. (2004). Economic costs and benefits of Australian Indigenous languages: Discussion Paper. Canberra: Department of Communication, Information Technology and the Arts (DCITA).
Myerson, G. & Rydin, Y. (1996). The Language of Environment: A new rhetoric. UCL Press: London.
Reddy, M. J. (1979). The conduit metaphor: A case of frame conflict in our language about language. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought (pp. 284-310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Toffler, A. (1970). Future Shock. New York: Random House.
Wohlleben, P. (2016). The hidden life of trees. London: William Collin

Published

2020-03-08

How to Cite

Mühlhäusler, P. (2020). Quo vadis ecolinguistics. Ecolinguística: Revista Brasileira De Ecologia E Linguagem (ECO-REBEL), 6(1), 05–23. Retrieved from https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/erbel/article/view/29870

Issue

Section

Articles