A ecolinguística na universidade

Autores

  • Peter Mühlhäusler University of Adelaide

Palavras-chave:

Ecolinguística; currículos universitários; multidistiplinaridade.

Resumo

O objetivo deste artigo é duplo. Eu gostaria de fornecer um esboço da abordagem ecolinguística ao estudo da linguagem e das línguas; fornecer argumentos para a inclusão da ecolinguística no conteúdo programático das universidades ”“ apesar de ainda não estar claro para mim se ela deve ser abrigada no departamento de linguística, de estudos ambientais, de geografia, de psicologia ou em outro.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Peter Mühlhäusler, University of Adelaide

Alemão de nascimento, estudou em Stellenbosch, Reading e na Australian National University. Lecionou linguística na Universidade de Oxford e na de Adelaide (Austrália). Nesta última é Foundation Professor of Linguistics. Suas principais áreas de interesse são: línguas crioulas e pidgins, línguas indígenas da Austrália, gramática dos pronomes e ecolinguística. Mühlhäusler é autor de um dos primeiros manuais de introdução à crioulística (Pidgin and creole linguistics, 1986), de um dois dos primeiros livros sobre língua e meio ambiente: Greenspeak: A study of environmental discourse (1999), juntamente com Rom Harré e Jens Brockmeier, e Language of environment - Environment of language: A course in ecolinguistics, 2003). É coautor (com Stephen Wurm e Tyron Darrell) do monumental Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas (1996). Tem colaborado com grande parte das coletâneas de crioulística/pidginística e de ecolinguística. Devido a suas pesquisas de campo nas ilhas de Norfolk, tem contribuído também com as etnociências, mais especificamente, com a etnoecologia linguística, ou seja, nomes para espécimes da flora e da fauna em comunidades tradicionais.

Referências

AIKHENVALD, A. Y. Areal diffusion and language contact in the Içana-Vaupés basin, North West Amazonia. In: AIKHENVALD, A. Y.; DIXON, R. M. W. (orgs.). The Amazonian Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999, p. 385-415.

ALEXANDER, Richard J. Framing Discourse on the Environment, Nova York & London: Routledge, 2009.

ANDERSON, B. R. Language, Fantasy, Revolution: Java, 1900-1945. In Prisma 50, 1990, p. 25-39.

BAKER, Philip; MÜHLHÄUSLER, Peter. From Business to Pidgin. In: Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 1, 1990, p. 87-115.

BENDER, B. W. Micronesian Languages’, in Current Trends in Linguistics 8, 1970, p. 426-65.

BIALYSTOK, Ellen; FREGUS, I. M.; FREEDMAN, Craig; FREEDMAN; Morris. Bilingualism as a protection against the onset of symptoms of dementia. Neuropsychologia v. 45, n. 2, 2007, p. 459 ”“ 464.

BREWER, R. The Science of Ecology. Philadelphia: Saunders College Publications, 1988. Calvet, Louis-Jean. Towards an Ecology of World Languages. Cambridge: Polity, 2006.

CRONON, William. A Plan for Stories: Nature, History and Narrative’, The Journal of American History v. 78, n. 4, 1992, p. 1347-1376.

CROSBY, Alfred W. Ecological Imperialism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986.

CRYSTAL, David. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge. University Press, 1007, 2a. 2006, ed., 1997.

DENISON, N. A Linguistics Ecology for Europe? In: Folia Linguistica v. XVI, n. 1, 1982, p. 1- 16.

Department of Employment, Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DEETYA). ‘Desert Schools’ v. 1. Canberra, 1996.

DÖRING, Martin. ”Vereint hinterm Deich” ”“ Die metaphorische Konstruktion der Wiedervereinigung in der deutschen Presseberichterstattung zur Oderflut 1997’. In: FILL, A.; PENZ, H.; TRAMPE, W. (eds.) Colourful Green Ideas. Bern: Peter Lang, 2002.

DRECHSEL, E. J. Mobilian Jargon: Linguistic and Sociohistorical Aspects of a Native American Pidgin. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997.

DUNCAN, J. S. The City as Text: The Politics of Landscape Interpretation in the United Kingdom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

DUTTON, T. E. Hiri-Motu ”“ Iena Sivarai. Port Moresby: University of Papua New Guinea bPress, 1983.

ENNINGER, W.; HAYNES, L. Language ecology ”“ a revived paradigm? In: Enninger, W.; Haynes, L. (orgs.). Studies in Language Ecology. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1984, p. 235”“236.

FILL, Alwin. Ökolinguistik - Eine Einführung, Tübingen: Narr, 1993.

FILL, A. (org.). Sprachökologie und Ökolinguistik. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 1996.

______; MÜHLHÄUSLER, Peter (orgs.). The Ecolinguistics Reader. Londres & Nova York: Continuum, 2001.

Fill, Alwin; Penz, H.; Trampe, W. (orgs.). Colourful Green Ideas. Bern: Peter Lang, 2002.

Gumperz, J. J.; Wilson, R. Convergence and Creolization: A Case From the Indo-Aryan / Dravidian Border. In: HYMES, D. (org.) Pidginization and Creolization. Londres: Cambridge University Press, 1971, p. 151-168.

HAARMAN, H. Multilingualisms 2: Elemente einer Sprachökologie. Tübingen: Narr, 1980.

HALLIDAY, Michael A.K., 1992, ‘New Ways of Meaning: The Challenges to Applied Linguistics’ in Pütz (ed.), 59-95.

Hansen, K. C. Communicability of some Western Desert communilects. In: Hudson, J.; Pym, N. (orgs.) Language Survey - Work Papers of SIL/AAB, B-11, Darwin: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1984.

HARRÉ, R.; BROCKMEIER, J.; MÜHLHÄUSLER, P. Greenspeak. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 1999.

HAUGEN, Einar. The Ecology of Language. In: A.S. DIL (org.) The Ecology of Language, essays by Einar Haugen. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1972, p. 325-39.

HILL, J. H. Language contact systems and adaptations’, in Journal of Anthropological Research v. 34, n. 1, 1978, p. 1”“26.

HYMES, Dell (org.). Pidginization and Creolizatin of Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971.

_______; Bittle, W. E. Studies in South Western Ethnolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton, 1967.

KAHN, Mary. Passive Voice of Science: Language abuse in the wild life profession. In: FILL, Alwin; MÜHLHÄUSLER, Peter (orgs.). The Ecolinguistics Reader. Londres: Continuum, 2001, p. 241-244).

KETTEMANN, B.; PENZ, H. ECOnstructing Language, Nature and Society. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, 2000.

LAKOFF, George. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1987.

LAYCOCK, D. C. Multilingualism: Linguistics Boundaries and Unsolved Problems in Papua New Guinea. In: WURM, S. A. (org.) New Guinea and Neighbouring Areas: A Sociolinguistic Laboratory. The Hague: Mouton, 1979).

_______. Melanesian Linguistic Diversity: A Melanesian Choice? In: MAY, R. J.; NELSON, H. (orgs.). Melanesian beyond Diversity. Canberra: Research School of Pacific Studies, 1981.

LANDY, Marc. Environmental Impact Statement Glossary Nova York: Quadrangle Books, 1979.

MACKEY, W.F. The ecology of language shift. In: NELDE, P. (org.). Sprachkontakt und Sprachkonflikt. Wiesbaden: Steiner, 1980, p. 35”“41.

MAFFI, Luisa (org.). On biocultural diversity: linking language knowledge and the environment. Washington/London: Smithsonian Institution Press, 2001.

MALINOWSKI, C. The Problem of Meaning in Primitive Languages. In: ODGEN, C. K.; RICHARDS, I. A. (orgs.) The Meaning of Meaning. Londres: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1930.

MARTIN, James R. Grammaticalizing Ecology: The Politics of Baby Seals and Kangaroos. In THREADGOLD et al. (orgs.), 1986, p. 235-267.

MUFWENE, Salikoko S. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.

MÜHLHÄUSLER, Peter. Talking about Environmental Issues. Language and Communication v. 3, n. 1, 1983.

_______. Language ecology ”” contact without conflict. In: PÜTZ, Martin (org.). Language Choices. 1995a, p. 3-16.

_______. The interdependence of linguistic and biological diversity, MYERS, D. (org.) Darwin: University of the Northern Territory Press, 1995b, p. 154”“161.

_______. Linguistic adaptation to changed environmental conditions: some lessons from the past. In: FILL, A. (org.), 1996a, p. 105”“13.

_______. Linguistic Ecology: Language Change And Linguistic Imperialism In The Pacific Region. London: Routledge, 1996b.

_______. Some Pacific Island Utopies and their languages. Plurilinguismes 15, 1998, p. 27-47

_______. Language Planning and Language Ecology. Current Issues in Language Planning v. 1, n. 3, 2000, p. 306-368.

_______. Language as an ecological phenomenon. In: The Linacre Journal 5, 2002, p. 61”“68.

_______. Language of Environment, Environment of Language: A course in ecolinguistics. London: Battlebridge, 2003a.

_______. English as an exotic language. In: Mair, C. The Politics of English as a World Language. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2003b, p. 67 ”“ 86.

_______; DAMANIA, R . Economic Costs and Benefits of Australian Indigenous Languages. Discussion Paper prepared for Australian Government Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Services (ATSIS, Canberra : DCITA), 2004.

MÜHLHÄUSLER , Peter; PEACE, A. Mind Your Language - Ecolinguistics as a Resource for Ecotourism. Conference paper ‘Ecotourism Association of Australia’, Fraser Island,

_______. Discourses of ecotourism: the case of Fraser Island. In: Language and Communication 21, 2001, p. 359 ”“ 380.

_______. Environmental Discourses. In Annual Review of Anthropology 35, 2006, p. 457”“479.

NELDE, P. H. Language Contact Means Language Conflict’, In: MAC EOIN, G.; AHLQVIST, A.; Ò HAODHA, D. Third International Conference on Minority Languages. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1987, p. 33 ”“ 42.

Nettle, D. Linguistic Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Ortony, Andrew (org.). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.

Puetz, Martin (org.). Thirty Years of Linguistic Evolution. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1992.

_______. Language Contact and Language Conflict. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1994.

_______. Language choices-contact and conflict’, in PUETZ, M. (org.). Language Choices. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1997, p. ix”“xi.

SKUTNABB-KANGAS, Tove; PHILLIPSON, Robert (orgs.). Linguistic Human Rights, Berlin : Mouton De Gruyter, 1995.

SUTTON, P. Language in Aboriginal Australia: Social Dialects in a Geographic Idiom. In: Romaine, S. (org.) Language in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.

THREADGOLD, Terry; GROSZ, E. A.; KRESS, Gunther; HALLIDAY, M.A.K. (orgs). Semiotics, Ideology, Language. Sydney: Sydney Association for Studies in Society and Culture, 1986.

THURSTON, W. R. Process of Changes in the Language of North-Western New Britain. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics 1399, 1987.

TINDALE, N. B. Aboriginal Tribes of Australia. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974.

TRAMPE, Wilhelm. Oekologische Linguistik. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1990.

TRYON, D.T. The Language Situatino in the New Hebrides’, in Wurm, S. A. (org.). New Guinea and Neighbouring Areas. Haia: Mouton, 1979.

VOEGELIN C.F.; VOEGELIN F.M.; SCHUTZ, N.W. Jr. The Language Situation in Arizona as Part of South West Cultural Area. In: Hymes; Bittle (eds.), 1967, p. 403-451.

WHORF, Benjamin Lee. Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. Cambridge, Mass.: Technology Press, 1956.

WILLIAMS, C. H. Language planning and social change: Ecological speculations’, in Language Planning: Focusschrift in Honour of Joshua A. Fishman on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday, 3, p. 53-74. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1991.

WURM, S. A.; LAYCOCK, D.C. The Question of Language and Dialect in New Guinea. In: Oceania 37, 1962, p. 128”“143.

Downloads

Publicado

2016-02-17

Como Citar

Mühlhäusler, P. (2016). A ecolinguística na universidade. Ecolinguística: Revista Brasileira De Ecologia E Linguagem (ECO-REBEL), 2(1), 57–70. Recuperado de https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/erbel/article/view/9898

Edição

v. 2 n. 1 (2016)

Seção

Artigos

Licença

Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:

Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, sendo o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Creative Commons Attribution License o que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria do trabalho e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista (ex.: publicar em repositório institucional ou como capítulo de livro), com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.

Autores têm permissão e são estimulados a publicar e distribuir seu trabalho online (ex.: em repositórios institucionais ou na sua página pessoal) a qualquer ponto antes ou durante o processo editorial, já que isso pode gerar alterações produtivas, bem como aumentar o impacto e a citação do trabalho publicado (Veja O Efeito do Acesso Livre).