Ambos os três
Sobre algumas distinções tipológicas e seu significado estrutural na teoria do parentesco
Mots-clés :
AntropologiaRésumé
Este trabalho1 analisa as diferenças formais entre algumas configurações de parentesco reconhecidas pela tradição antropológica ”” as variedades ‘dravidiana’, ‘kariera’ e ‘iroquesa’ do esquema terminológico dito ‘fusão bifurcada’ (bifurcate merging) ”” e as discute no quadro da teoria estrutural da aliança desenvolvida por C. Lévi-Strauss c L. Dumont. Após estabelecer as diferenças entre estas variedades, examino dois pares conceituais centrais da teoria do parentesco, a saber, ‘consangüíneo/afim’ e ‘paralelo/ cruzado’; em seguida, avanço uma conjetura sobre os correlatos matrimoniais possíveis das terminologias com cruzamento iroquês; por fim, evoco uma variante do sistema dravidiano difundida na América do Sul indígena, concluindo com algumas considerações sobre a possibilidade de diferentes princípios classificatórios coexistirem em uma mesma organização social, o que põe em questão a idéia comum de que a cada unidade etnográfica de tipo ‘sociedade’ corresponderia um modelo terminológico único.
Téléchargements
Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.
Références
ALBERT, Bruce. 1985. Temps du Sang, Temps des Cendres: Representation de la Maladie, Système Rituel et Espace Politique chez les Yanomami du Sud-est (Amazonie Brésilienne). Tese de do u to rad o , Université de Paris X, Nanterre.
ALL EN, Nicholas J. 1975. Byansi Kinship Term inology: A Study in Symmetry. Man 10 (1): 80-94.
_______ . [19961. “The Prehistory o f Dravidian-type T e rm in o lo g ie s". In Transformations o f Kinship Systems: Dravidian, Australian, Iroquois a n d Crow-Omaha (T. T rau tm an n , M. Godelier & F. T jon Sie F a t, o rg s .), Washington D .C .: Smithsonian Institution Press (em p reparação).
A RCAND, Bernard. 1977. “Th e Logic o f Cuiva Kinship” . Actes du XLIIeme Congrès In te rnational des Américanistes. Vol.II: 19-34.
A RVE LLO -JIM ÉN EZ, Nelly. 1974. Relaciones Políticas en una So c ied a d Tribal: Estudio de los Y e ’cuana, Indígenas d e l Amazonas Venezoelano. Mexico: Instituto Indigenista Interamericano.
BARNARD, Alan & Anthony GOOD. 1984. Research Practices in the Study o f Kinship. Londres: Academic Press.
BARNES, Robert H. 1984. Two Crows Denies It: The History o f a Controversy in Omaha Sociology. Lincoln: University o f Nebraska Press.
BOUE Z, Serge. 1989. “ L ’Alliance Classificatoire chez les Ho: Préférence ou P re sc rip tio n ” . In Les Complexités de ¡ ’alliance, I: les systèmes semi-complexes (F. Héritier-Augé & E. Co p et-R o u g ier o rg s .). Paris: Archives Contemporaines. pp. 1-22.
BOWDEN, Ross. 1983. Kwoma Terminology and M arriage Alliance: The ‘O m a h a ’ Problem Revisited. Man 18 (4): 745-65.
BU CH L ER , Ira R. 1967. L ’A nalyse Formelle des Terminologies de Párente Iroquoises. L 'H om m e 7(1) : 5-31.
BU CH L ER , Ira R. & Henry A. SELBY. 1968. Kinship & Social Organization: An Introduction to Theory an d Method. New York: Macmillan.
CALA V IA , O scar. 1995. O Nome e o Tem po dos Yaminawa. Tese de d o u to ra d o . U n iv e rs id a de de São Paulo.
C AM PB E LL, Alan T. 1989. To S quare with Genesis: Causal Statements a n d Shamanic Ideas in Wayãpí. Edinburgo: Edinburgh University Press.
CO E LH O DE SO U ZA , Marcela S. 1995. “Da Complexidade do Elementar: Para uma Reco n sideração do Parentesco X inguano” . In Antropologia do p a ren te s co : estudos amerindios (E. Viveiros de C astro, org .). Rio de Janeiro: Editora da UFRJ. pp. 121-206.
D aMA TTA , Roberto. 1979. “The Apinayé Relationship System: Term inology and Id eo lo g y ” .In D ialectical Societies: The Gê a n d Bororo o f Central Brazil (D. Maybury-Lewis, o rg .). C am b rid g e , M ass.: Ha rva rd University Press. pp. 83-127.
D ESCO LA, Philippe. 1993a. Les Affinités Sélectives: Alliance, G uerre e t Predation dans 1’Ensemble Jiv aro . L 'H om m e 1 2 6 /1 2 8 (3 3 (2/4)]: 171-190. . 1993b. Les Lances du Crépuscule: Relations Jivaros, Haute-Amazonie. Paris: Plon.
D O L E , G e rtrude . 1957. The Development o f Patterns o f Kinship Nomenclature. Tese ded o u to ra d o . University o f Michigan. . 1969. Generation Kinship Nomenclature as an Adaptation to Endogamy. Southwestern J o u rn a l o f A n thropology 25 (2): 105-123.
_______ . 1978. “ Pattern and Variation in Amahuaca Kin T e rm in o lo g y ” . In Social C o rre la te s of Kin Term inology (Working Papers on South American Indians, I) (K. Kensinger, o rg .). Bennington: Bennington College, pp. 13-36.
DR EY FU S , Simone. 1977. “Note su r l'E sp a c e des Relations Sociales e t la Structure deParenté: Propositions p our un Modéle Sud-américain de l’A lliance Sym é triq u e ” . Actes du XLIIeme Congrès International des Américanistes. Vol.II: 379-385.
DUM O N T , Louis. 1971. Introduction à Deu x Theories d ’Anthropologie Sociale: Groupes de Filiation et A lliance de M a n a g e . Paris: Mouton.
_______ . [1953, 1957, 1966, 1970] 1975. Dravidien et Kariera: L ’Alliance de M a n a g e dans I'ln d e d u Sud, et en Australie. Paris: Mouton.
_______ . 1983a. Affinity as Value: Marriage Alliance in South India, with Comparative Essays on Australia. Londres: The University o f Chicago Press.
_______ . 1983b. “La V a leur chez les M odem e s et les A u tre s .” In Essais su r I ’lndividualisme: Une Perspective Anthropologique su r l ’Idéologie Moderne (L. Dumont). Paris: Seuil. pp. 222-262.
EGGAN, Fred . [1937] 1955. “The C heyenne and Arapaho Kinship System". In Social Organization o f North American Tribes (F. Eggan, o rg .). Chicago: The University of Ch ic ag o Press (edição aumentada), pp. 35-95.
ELKIN, A. P. [1954] 1967. Les Aborigènes Australiens. Paris: Gallimard.
ERIKSON, Philippe. 1990. Le Matis d ’Amazonie: Parure du C o rp s , Identité Ethnique et Organisation Sociale. Tese de do u to rad o , Université de Paris X, Nanterre.
EVANS-PR ITCHARD, Edward E. 1951. Kinship a n d Marriage among th e Nuer. Oxford: C la rendon.
FAUSTO, C arlos. 1991. Os Parakanã: Casamento A vuncular e Dravidianato na Amazonia. Dissertação de me strado. Museu Nacional.
_______ . 1995. “De Primos e Sobrinhas: Terminologia e Aliança entre os P arakanã (Tupi) do P a rá ” . In Antropologia do p a ren te s co : Estudos Ameríndios (E. Viveiros de Castro, o rg .). Rio de Jane iro: Editora da UFRJ. pp. 61-119.
G EL L, Alfred. 1975. Me tamorphosis o f th e Cassowaries: Umeda Society, L a n g u a g e a n d Ritual. Londres: Athlone.
GOOD, Anthony. 1980. E ld e r’s Sister D au g h ter Marriage in South Asia. Jo u rn a l o f Anth ro p o lo g ica l Research 36 (4): 474-500.
_______ Ӣ 1981. Prescription, Preference and Practice: Marriage Practices among the Kondaiyankottai M arav a r o f South India. Man 16 (1): 108-129.
_______ . [sem data], “On the non-existence o f ‘Dravidian k in sh ip ’” , (inédito).
G O O D EN O U GH , Ward H . 1970. Description an d Comparison in Cultural Anthropology. C am bridge : Cambridge University Press.
GOODY, Jack . [1956] 1969. “A Comparative Approach to Incest and A d u lte ry ” . In
Comparative Studies in Kinship (J. Goody). Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 13- 38.
GOUGH, Kathleen. 1959. Resenha de Louis Dumont, Une Sous-caste d ’ln d e du Sud. Man 59, art. 323.
_______ . 1966. Resenha de Louis Dumont, Une Sous-caste d ’ln d e du S u d e Hierarchy a n d Marriage Alliance in South Indian Kinship. Current Anthropology 7 (3): 332-335.
GREGOR, Thom as. 1985. Anxious Pleasures: The S exual Lives o f an Amazonian People. Chicago: The University o f Chicago Press.
GREGORY, C h ris A. 1982. Gifts an d Commodities. Londres: Academic Press.
H EN L EY , Paul. 1972. The Panare: Tradition a n d Change on the Amazonian Frontier. New Haven: Yale University Press.
_______ . [sem data], “ South Indian models in the Amazonian lowlands", (a ser publicado em The J o u rn a l o f the Royal Anthropological Institute).
H ERITIER, Françoise . 1981. L 'E xe rcic e de la Pa ren te . Paris: Seuil/Gallimard.
HORNBORG, Alf. 1988. Dualism a n d Hierarchy in Low la n d South America: Trajectories o f Indigenous Social Organization. Estocolmo: Almqvist & Wiksell (Uppsala Studies in Cultural A nthropology, 9).
_______ . 1993. Panoan Marriage Sections: A Comparative Perspective. Ethnology 32 (1): 101- 108.
HO U SEM A N , Michael. 1989. “Les Structures de l’A lliance chez les Beti: Analyse Critique du Fonc tio n n em en tMa trim o n ia l dans les Systèmes Sem i-com p lex e s.” In Les Complexités de ¡ ’alliance, I: les systèmes semi-complexes (F. Héritier-Augé & E. C o pet-R ougier, o rg s.).
Paris: Archives Contemporaines. pp. 149-177.
H OUSEM AN, Michael & Douglas R. WHITE. [ 1995]. “ Structures réticulaires de la pratique m a trim oniale ” , (a ser publicado em L ’Homme).
_______. [1996]. “Taking Sides. Marriage Networks and Dravidian Kinship in Lowland South A m e ric a ” . In Transformations o f Kinship Systems: Dravidian, Australian, Iroquois a n d Crow-Omaha (T. Trautmann, M. G o d e lie r& F. Tjon Sie Fat, o rg s .). Washington D .C .: Smithsonian Institution Press (em preparação).
IVES, John W. 1990. A Theory o f Northern Athapaskan Prehistory. Boulder/San F ran c isco / Calgary: Westview Press/The University o f Calgary Press.
_______ . [1996]. “Developmental Processes in the Pre-contact History o f Athapaskan, Algonquian and Numic Kinship Systems” . In Transformations o f Kinship Systems: Dravidian, Australian, Iroquois a n d Crow-Omaha (T. Trau tm an n , M. Go d e lie r & F. Tjon Sie Fat, o rg s .). Washington D .C .: Smithsonian Institution Press (em prep a ra ção ).
JACKSON, Jean. 1983. The Fish People: Linguistic Exogamy a n d Tukanoan Identity in Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
JU ILL ERA T, Bernard. 1977. Terminologie de Parenté Ia fa r (Nouvelle-Guinée). L 'H om m e 17 (4): 5-33.
_______ . 1986. Les Enfants du Sang: Société, Reproduction et Imaginaire en N ouvelle Guinée. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de I'Homme.
KAY, Paul. 1965. A Generalization o f the C ross/P arallel Distinction. American A nthropologist 67 (1): 30-43.
____ . 1967. On the Multiplicity of C ross/P arallel Distinctions. American A nthropologist 69 (1): 83-85.
KEESING, Roger. 1975. Kin Groups a n d Social Structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
KENSINGER, Kenneth M. 1984. “An Emic model o f Cashinahua m a rriag e .” In Marriage Practices in Low la n d South America (K. Kensinger, o rg .). Urbana: University o f Illinois Press, pp. 221-251.
______. 1991. “ Panoan Kinship Terminology and Social Organization: Drav id ian o r Kariera, o r Something Else ? ” Trabalho apresentado ao simpósio “Classic Panoan Topics in the Light o f Recent R esearch". XLVII International Congress o f Americanists, Tulane University, Nova Orleans.
KRON EN FELD , David B. 1989. Morgan versus Dorsey on the Omaha C ro ss/P arallel Contrast: Theoretical Implications. L 'H om m e 109 [34 (1)]: 76-106.
KUPER, Adam. 1983. Anthropology a n d Anthropologists: The Modern British school. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (edição revista).
LADEIRA, Maria Elisa. 1982. A T ro ca de Nomes e a Tro ca de Cônjuges: Uma Contribuição ao Estudo do Parentesco Timbira. Dissertação de mestrado. Universidade de São Paulo.
L EA CH , Edmond. [1951] 1961. “The Structural Implications o f Matrilateral C ross-cousin M arria g e ". In Rethinking A n thropology (E. Leach). Londres: Athlone. pp. 54-104.
______. [1959] 1961. "Rethinking an thropology". In Rethinking Anthropology (E. Leach). Londres: Athlone. pp. 1-27.
LÉVI-STRAUSS, Claude. 1943. The Social Use o f Kinship Terms among Brazilian Indians. American Anthropologist 45 (3): 398-409.
_______ . 1966. “The Future o f Kinship Studies (The Huxley Memorial Lecture 1965)". Proceeding o f the Royal Anthropological Institute o f Great Britain a n d Ire la n d fo r 1965: 13-22.
_______ . [1949] 1967. Les Structures Élémentaires d e la Parente. Paris/Haia: Mouton.
_______ . 1984. Paroles D o n n ie s . Paris: Plon.
LIENHARDT , Godfrey. 1961. Divinity a n d Experience: The Religion o f the Dinka. Oxford: Clarendon.
LIMA, Edilene Coffaci de. 1994. Katukina: História e Organização Social de um Grupo Pano do Alto Juruá . Dissertação de mestrado. Universidade de São Paulo.
LORRAIN, François. 1975. Réseaux Sociaux et Classifications Sociales: Essai su r 1'Algèbre et
la Géométrie des Structures Sociales. Paris: Hermann.
LOUNSBURY , Floyd G. [ 1964] 1969. “The Structural Analysis o f Kinship S emantics". In Cognitive A n thropology (S. T yler, o rg .). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 193-212.
MAYBURY-LEWIS, David. 1979. “Cultural categories o f the Central G ê ” . In Dialectical Societies: The Gê a n d Bororo o f C entral Bra zil (D. Maybury-Lewis, org ). C am bridge,M ass.: H a rv a rd University Press, pp. 218-246.
McAL LISTER , J. Gilbert. [ 1937] 1955. “Kiowa-Apache Social O rg an iz atio n ” . In Social Organization o f North American Tribes (F. E ggan, o rg .). Chicago: The University o f Chicago Press (edição aumentada), pp. 99-169.
M cCA LLUM, Cecilia. 1989. Gender, Personhood and Social Organization amongst the Cashinahua o f Western Amazonia. Tese de d o utorado, London School o f Economics.
M ELATTI, Julio C ez a r. 1977. Estrutura Social M am b o : Um Sistema Australiano na Am a zo nia. Anuário Antropológico/76: 83-120.
MEN G ET , Patrick. 1977. Au Nom des Autres: Classification des Relations Sociales chez les Txicão du Haut-Xingu. Tese de doutorado (3 o ciclo), Université de Paris X, Nanterre.
MET ZG ER , Donald J. & Robert V. MOREY. 1983. “Los Hiwi (G u ah ib o )” . In Los Abo ríg en e s d e Venezuela, II: Etnología Contemporánea I (W. Coppens, org.). Caracas: F unda c ción La Salle de Ciencias Naturales / Instituto Caribe de Antropología y Sociología / Monte Avila Editores, pp. 125-216.
M UL LER, Jean-C laude . 1980. Straight Sister-exchange and the Transition from Elementary to Complex Structures. American Ethnologist 7 (3): 518-528.
_______ . 1982. D u Bon Usage du Sexe et du M a n a g e . Structures Matrimoniales du Haut Plateau Nigérian. Paris/Québec: L ’H armattan / Serge Fleury.
MURDOCK, George P. 1949. Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
MYERS, Fred R. 1986. Pintupi Country, Pintupi Self: Sentiment, Place, a n d Politics among Western D e sert Aborigines. Washington D C .: Smithsonian Institution Press.
N EED HAM , Rodney. 1971. “ In troduction". In Rethinking Kinship a n d Marriage (R. N e edham, o rg .). Londres: Tavistock (ASA Monographs, 11): pp. xiii-cxvii.
_______ . 1973. Prescription. Oceania 43 (3): 166-81.
OBERG, Kalervo. 1953. Indian Tribes o f Northern Mato Grosso, Brazil. Washington D C.: Smithsonian Institution (Institute o f Social Anthropology, Publication n° 15). 8
ALL EN, Nicholas J. 1975. Byansi Kinship Term inology: A Study in Symmetry. Man 10 (1): 80-94.
_______ . [19961. “The Prehistory o f Dravidian-type T e rm in o lo g ie s". In Transformations o f Kinship Systems: Dravidian, Australian, Iroquois a n d Crow-Omaha (T. T rau tm an n , M. Godelier & F. T jon Sie F a t, o rg s .), Washington D .C .: Smithsonian Institution Press (em p reparação).
A RCAND, Bernard. 1977. “Th e Logic o f Cuiva Kinship” . Actes du XLIIeme Congrès In te rnational des Américanistes. Vol.II: 19-34.
A RVE LLO -JIM ÉN EZ, Nelly. 1974. Relaciones Políticas en una So c ied a d Tribal: Estudio de los Y e ’cuana, Indígenas d e l Amazonas Venezoelano. Mexico: Instituto Indigenista Interamericano.
BARNARD, Alan & Anthony GOOD. 1984. Research Practices in the Study o f Kinship. Londres: Academic Press.
BARNES, Robert H. 1984. Two Crows Denies It: The History o f a Controversy in Omaha Sociology. Lincoln: University o f Nebraska Press.
BOUE Z, Serge. 1989. “ L ’Alliance Classificatoire chez les Ho: Préférence ou P re sc rip tio n ” . In Les Complexités de ¡ ’alliance, I: les systèmes semi-complexes (F. Héritier-Augé & E. Co p et-R o u g ier o rg s .). Paris: Archives Contemporaines. pp. 1-22.
BOWDEN, Ross. 1983. Kwoma Terminology and M arriage Alliance: The ‘O m a h a ’ Problem Revisited. Man 18 (4): 745-65.
BU CH L ER , Ira R. 1967. L ’A nalyse Formelle des Terminologies de Párente Iroquoises. L 'H om m e 7(1) : 5-31.
BU CH L ER , Ira R. & Henry A. SELBY. 1968. Kinship & Social Organization: An Introduction to Theory an d Method. New York: Macmillan.
CALA V IA , O scar. 1995. O Nome e o Tem po dos Yaminawa. Tese de d o u to ra d o . U n iv e rs id a de de São Paulo.
C AM PB E LL, Alan T. 1989. To S quare with Genesis: Causal Statements a n d Shamanic Ideas in Wayãpí. Edinburgo: Edinburgh University Press.
CO E LH O DE SO U ZA , Marcela S. 1995. “Da Complexidade do Elementar: Para uma Reco n sideração do Parentesco X inguano” . In Antropologia do p a ren te s co : estudos amerindios (E. Viveiros de C astro, org .). Rio de Janeiro: Editora da UFRJ. pp. 121-206.
D aMA TTA , Roberto. 1979. “The Apinayé Relationship System: Term inology and Id eo lo g y ” .In D ialectical Societies: The Gê a n d Bororo o f Central Brazil (D. Maybury-Lewis, o rg .). C am b rid g e , M ass.: Ha rva rd University Press. pp. 83-127.
D ESCO LA, Philippe. 1993a. Les Affinités Sélectives: Alliance, G uerre e t Predation dans 1’Ensemble Jiv aro . L 'H om m e 1 2 6 /1 2 8 (3 3 (2/4)]: 171-190. . 1993b. Les Lances du Crépuscule: Relations Jivaros, Haute-Amazonie. Paris: Plon.
D O L E , G e rtrude . 1957. The Development o f Patterns o f Kinship Nomenclature. Tese ded o u to ra d o . University o f Michigan. . 1969. Generation Kinship Nomenclature as an Adaptation to Endogamy. Southwestern J o u rn a l o f A n thropology 25 (2): 105-123.
_______ . 1978. “ Pattern and Variation in Amahuaca Kin T e rm in o lo g y ” . In Social C o rre la te s of Kin Term inology (Working Papers on South American Indians, I) (K. Kensinger, o rg .). Bennington: Bennington College, pp. 13-36.
DR EY FU S , Simone. 1977. “Note su r l'E sp a c e des Relations Sociales e t la Structure deParenté: Propositions p our un Modéle Sud-américain de l’A lliance Sym é triq u e ” . Actes du XLIIeme Congrès International des Américanistes. Vol.II: 379-385.
DUM O N T , Louis. 1971. Introduction à Deu x Theories d ’Anthropologie Sociale: Groupes de Filiation et A lliance de M a n a g e . Paris: Mouton.
_______ . [1953, 1957, 1966, 1970] 1975. Dravidien et Kariera: L ’Alliance de M a n a g e dans I'ln d e d u Sud, et en Australie. Paris: Mouton.
_______ . 1983a. Affinity as Value: Marriage Alliance in South India, with Comparative Essays on Australia. Londres: The University o f Chicago Press.
_______ . 1983b. “La V a leur chez les M odem e s et les A u tre s .” In Essais su r I ’lndividualisme: Une Perspective Anthropologique su r l ’Idéologie Moderne (L. Dumont). Paris: Seuil. pp. 222-262.
EGGAN, Fred . [1937] 1955. “The C heyenne and Arapaho Kinship System". In Social Organization o f North American Tribes (F. Eggan, o rg .). Chicago: The University of Ch ic ag o Press (edição aumentada), pp. 35-95.
ELKIN, A. P. [1954] 1967. Les Aborigènes Australiens. Paris: Gallimard.
ERIKSON, Philippe. 1990. Le Matis d ’Amazonie: Parure du C o rp s , Identité Ethnique et Organisation Sociale. Tese de do u to rad o , Université de Paris X, Nanterre.
EVANS-PR ITCHARD, Edward E. 1951. Kinship a n d Marriage among th e Nuer. Oxford: C la rendon.
FAUSTO, C arlos. 1991. Os Parakanã: Casamento A vuncular e Dravidianato na Amazonia. Dissertação de me strado. Museu Nacional.
_______ . 1995. “De Primos e Sobrinhas: Terminologia e Aliança entre os P arakanã (Tupi) do P a rá ” . In Antropologia do p a ren te s co : Estudos Ameríndios (E. Viveiros de Castro, o rg .). Rio de Jane iro: Editora da UFRJ. pp. 61-119.
G EL L, Alfred. 1975. Me tamorphosis o f th e Cassowaries: Umeda Society, L a n g u a g e a n d Ritual. Londres: Athlone.
GOOD, Anthony. 1980. E ld e r’s Sister D au g h ter Marriage in South Asia. Jo u rn a l o f Anth ro p o lo g ica l Research 36 (4): 474-500.
_______ Ӣ 1981. Prescription, Preference and Practice: Marriage Practices among the Kondaiyankottai M arav a r o f South India. Man 16 (1): 108-129.
_______ . [sem data], “On the non-existence o f ‘Dravidian k in sh ip ’” , (inédito).
G O O D EN O U GH , Ward H . 1970. Description an d Comparison in Cultural Anthropology. C am bridge : Cambridge University Press.
GOODY, Jack . [1956] 1969. “A Comparative Approach to Incest and A d u lte ry ” . In
Comparative Studies in Kinship (J. Goody). Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 13- 38.
GOUGH, Kathleen. 1959. Resenha de Louis Dumont, Une Sous-caste d ’ln d e du Sud. Man 59, art. 323.
_______ . 1966. Resenha de Louis Dumont, Une Sous-caste d ’ln d e du S u d e Hierarchy a n d Marriage Alliance in South Indian Kinship. Current Anthropology 7 (3): 332-335.
GREGOR, Thom as. 1985. Anxious Pleasures: The S exual Lives o f an Amazonian People. Chicago: The University o f Chicago Press.
GREGORY, C h ris A. 1982. Gifts an d Commodities. Londres: Academic Press.
H EN L EY , Paul. 1972. The Panare: Tradition a n d Change on the Amazonian Frontier. New Haven: Yale University Press.
_______ . [sem data], “ South Indian models in the Amazonian lowlands", (a ser publicado em The J o u rn a l o f the Royal Anthropological Institute).
H ERITIER, Françoise . 1981. L 'E xe rcic e de la Pa ren te . Paris: Seuil/Gallimard.
HORNBORG, Alf. 1988. Dualism a n d Hierarchy in Low la n d South America: Trajectories o f Indigenous Social Organization. Estocolmo: Almqvist & Wiksell (Uppsala Studies in Cultural A nthropology, 9).
_______ . 1993. Panoan Marriage Sections: A Comparative Perspective. Ethnology 32 (1): 101- 108.
HO U SEM A N , Michael. 1989. “Les Structures de l’A lliance chez les Beti: Analyse Critique du Fonc tio n n em en tMa trim o n ia l dans les Systèmes Sem i-com p lex e s.” In Les Complexités de ¡ ’alliance, I: les systèmes semi-complexes (F. Héritier-Augé & E. C o pet-R ougier, o rg s.).
Paris: Archives Contemporaines. pp. 149-177.
H OUSEM AN, Michael & Douglas R. WHITE. [ 1995]. “ Structures réticulaires de la pratique m a trim oniale ” , (a ser publicado em L ’Homme).
_______. [1996]. “Taking Sides. Marriage Networks and Dravidian Kinship in Lowland South A m e ric a ” . In Transformations o f Kinship Systems: Dravidian, Australian, Iroquois a n d Crow-Omaha (T. Trautmann, M. G o d e lie r& F. Tjon Sie Fat, o rg s .). Washington D .C .: Smithsonian Institution Press (em preparação).
IVES, John W. 1990. A Theory o f Northern Athapaskan Prehistory. Boulder/San F ran c isco / Calgary: Westview Press/The University o f Calgary Press.
_______ . [1996]. “Developmental Processes in the Pre-contact History o f Athapaskan, Algonquian and Numic Kinship Systems” . In Transformations o f Kinship Systems: Dravidian, Australian, Iroquois a n d Crow-Omaha (T. Trau tm an n , M. Go d e lie r & F. Tjon Sie Fat, o rg s .). Washington D .C .: Smithsonian Institution Press (em prep a ra ção ).
JACKSON, Jean. 1983. The Fish People: Linguistic Exogamy a n d Tukanoan Identity in Northwest Amazonia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
JU ILL ERA T, Bernard. 1977. Terminologie de Parenté Ia fa r (Nouvelle-Guinée). L 'H om m e 17 (4): 5-33.
_______ . 1986. Les Enfants du Sang: Société, Reproduction et Imaginaire en N ouvelle Guinée. Paris: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de I'Homme.
KAY, Paul. 1965. A Generalization o f the C ross/P arallel Distinction. American A nthropologist 67 (1): 30-43.
____ . 1967. On the Multiplicity of C ross/P arallel Distinctions. American A nthropologist 69 (1): 83-85.
KEESING, Roger. 1975. Kin Groups a n d Social Structure. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
KENSINGER, Kenneth M. 1984. “An Emic model o f Cashinahua m a rriag e .” In Marriage Practices in Low la n d South America (K. Kensinger, o rg .). Urbana: University o f Illinois Press, pp. 221-251.
______. 1991. “ Panoan Kinship Terminology and Social Organization: Drav id ian o r Kariera, o r Something Else ? ” Trabalho apresentado ao simpósio “Classic Panoan Topics in the Light o f Recent R esearch". XLVII International Congress o f Americanists, Tulane University, Nova Orleans.
KRON EN FELD , David B. 1989. Morgan versus Dorsey on the Omaha C ro ss/P arallel Contrast: Theoretical Implications. L 'H om m e 109 [34 (1)]: 76-106.
KUPER, Adam. 1983. Anthropology a n d Anthropologists: The Modern British school. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (edição revista).
LADEIRA, Maria Elisa. 1982. A T ro ca de Nomes e a Tro ca de Cônjuges: Uma Contribuição ao Estudo do Parentesco Timbira. Dissertação de mestrado. Universidade de São Paulo.
L EA CH , Edmond. [1951] 1961. “The Structural Implications o f Matrilateral C ross-cousin M arria g e ". In Rethinking A n thropology (E. Leach). Londres: Athlone. pp. 54-104.
______. [1959] 1961. "Rethinking an thropology". In Rethinking Anthropology (E. Leach). Londres: Athlone. pp. 1-27.
LÉVI-STRAUSS, Claude. 1943. The Social Use o f Kinship Terms among Brazilian Indians. American Anthropologist 45 (3): 398-409.
_______ . 1966. “The Future o f Kinship Studies (The Huxley Memorial Lecture 1965)". Proceeding o f the Royal Anthropological Institute o f Great Britain a n d Ire la n d fo r 1965: 13-22.
_______ . [1949] 1967. Les Structures Élémentaires d e la Parente. Paris/Haia: Mouton.
_______ . 1984. Paroles D o n n ie s . Paris: Plon.
LIENHARDT , Godfrey. 1961. Divinity a n d Experience: The Religion o f the Dinka. Oxford: Clarendon.
LIMA, Edilene Coffaci de. 1994. Katukina: História e Organização Social de um Grupo Pano do Alto Juruá . Dissertação de mestrado. Universidade de São Paulo.
LORRAIN, François. 1975. Réseaux Sociaux et Classifications Sociales: Essai su r 1'Algèbre et
la Géométrie des Structures Sociales. Paris: Hermann.
LOUNSBURY , Floyd G. [ 1964] 1969. “The Structural Analysis o f Kinship S emantics". In Cognitive A n thropology (S. T yler, o rg .). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 193-212.
MAYBURY-LEWIS, David. 1979. “Cultural categories o f the Central G ê ” . In Dialectical Societies: The Gê a n d Bororo o f C entral Bra zil (D. Maybury-Lewis, org ). C am bridge,M ass.: H a rv a rd University Press, pp. 218-246.
McAL LISTER , J. Gilbert. [ 1937] 1955. “Kiowa-Apache Social O rg an iz atio n ” . In Social Organization o f North American Tribes (F. E ggan, o rg .). Chicago: The University o f Chicago Press (edição aumentada), pp. 99-169.
M cCA LLUM, Cecilia. 1989. Gender, Personhood and Social Organization amongst the Cashinahua o f Western Amazonia. Tese de d o utorado, London School o f Economics.
M ELATTI, Julio C ez a r. 1977. Estrutura Social M am b o : Um Sistema Australiano na Am a zo nia. Anuário Antropológico/76: 83-120.
MEN G ET , Patrick. 1977. Au Nom des Autres: Classification des Relations Sociales chez les Txicão du Haut-Xingu. Tese de doutorado (3 o ciclo), Université de Paris X, Nanterre.
MET ZG ER , Donald J. & Robert V. MOREY. 1983. “Los Hiwi (G u ah ib o )” . In Los Abo ríg en e s d e Venezuela, II: Etnología Contemporánea I (W. Coppens, org.). Caracas: F unda c ción La Salle de Ciencias Naturales / Instituto Caribe de Antropología y Sociología / Monte Avila Editores, pp. 125-216.
M UL LER, Jean-C laude . 1980. Straight Sister-exchange and the Transition from Elementary to Complex Structures. American Ethnologist 7 (3): 518-528.
_______ . 1982. D u Bon Usage du Sexe et du M a n a g e . Structures Matrimoniales du Haut Plateau Nigérian. Paris/Québec: L ’H armattan / Serge Fleury.
MURDOCK, George P. 1949. Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
MYERS, Fred R. 1986. Pintupi Country, Pintupi Self: Sentiment, Place, a n d Politics among Western D e sert Aborigines. Washington D C .: Smithsonian Institution Press.
N EED HAM , Rodney. 1971. “ In troduction". In Rethinking Kinship a n d Marriage (R. N e edham, o rg .). Londres: Tavistock (ASA Monographs, 11): pp. xiii-cxvii.
_______ . 1973. Prescription. Oceania 43 (3): 166-81.
OBERG, Kalervo. 1953. Indian Tribes o f Northern Mato Grosso, Brazil. Washington D C.: Smithsonian Institution (Institute o f Social Anthropology, Publication n° 15). 8
Téléchargements
Publié-e
2018-02-02
Comment citer
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2018. « Ambos Os Três: Sobre Algumas distinções tipológicas E Seu Significado Estrutural Na Teoria Do Parentesco ». Anuário Antropológico 20 (1):9-91. https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/anuarioantropologico/article/view/6598.
Numéro
Rubrique
Essai bibliographique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Anuário Antropológico 1996
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en
Creative Commons - Atribución- 4.0 Internacional - CC BY 4.0
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode.en
