Scientific productivity and Collaborative network analysis on Aerospace Medicine from Scopus database in Scientometric method during 2014 to 2023
Keywords:
Aerospace Medicine, Scientific Productivity, Scopus, Scientometrics, BibliometricsAbstract
Objective: To assessment the scientific productivity and collaborative network analysis on aerospace medicine literature required bibliographic data have been extracted from the Scopus database with the utilization of all field search strategies. The keyword “Aerospace Medicine” was used as a topic search with the objectives of the study. Methods: The scientometric method has been used in this research from 2014 to 2023. The bibliographic data was exported in plain text format for this research. Bibexcel, VOSviewer, Microsoft Excel and Word were employed for data analysis and visualization functions. Results: Totally 11630 bibliographic records have been extracted in the study. The productivity of aerospace medicine publications has an upward trend from 2014(708) 6.08% to 2023(1564) 13.76%. The annual growth rate has shown spikes in the years 2021 and 2016 with the count of 18.46 and 16.77 respectively. Wang X and Wang Y are notable collaborative authors in aerospace medicine publications; they collaboratively published 4 publications with 0.03%. The United States has published 4122(35.44%) publications with 71533 citations. Conclusions: Overall, the aerospace medicine publications are increased and it shows the growth trend from 2014 to 2023. The results of the study will be useful for aerospace professionals to find out the hotspots and collaboration networks in the aerospace medicine domain.
Downloads
References
CAMPBELL, M. R.; Mohler, S. R.; Harsch, V. A.; Baisden, D. Hubertus strughold: the father of space medicine. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, v. 78, n. 7, p. 716-719, 2007.
EITO-BRUN, R.; LEDESMA RODRIGUEZ, M. 50 years of space research in Europe: a bibliometric profile of the European Space Agency (esa). Scientometrics, v. 109, n. 1, p. 551-576, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2053-8
HANCERLIOGULLARI, K. Ö. A scientometric analysis of space medicine. Politeknik Dergisi, v. 25, n. 1, p. 405-410, 2022. https://doi.org/10.2339/politeknik.1015295
HODKINSON, P. D.; Anderton, R. A.; Posselt, B. N.; Fong, K. J. An overview of space medicine. British Journal of Anaesthesia, v. 119, n. suppl_1, p. 143-153, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aex336
JESUS-NAVARRETE, A. de; Gomez-Morales, J. S.; Zacarias-de-León, G.; Jacobson, B. Scientific productivity and visibility from El Colegio de la Frontera Sur: 26 years of multidisciplinary research in Mexico. Library Research: archiving, library science and information, v. 37, n. 95, p. 13-33, 2023. https://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2023.95.58710
LIM, J. Introduction to aerospace medicine. Journal of the Korean Medical Association, v. 55, n. 7, p. 649-659, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2012.55.7.649
MARTINEZ-COMECHE.; J. A. Twenty-five years of research in social networks: evolution of topics between 1997 and 2021 using the algorism Latent Dirichlet Allocation. Archival science, library science and information, v. 37, n. 96, p. 145-177, 2023. https://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2023.96.58777
NALIMOV, V. V.; MULCHENKO, B. M. Scientometric Studies of Science as a Process of Information. Moscow, Russia: Science, 1969.
PENKOVA, S.; CARLOS, S. B. Scientific productivity in library science and information science in puerto rico (1961-2020). Investigacion Bibliotecologica, v. 37, n. 97, p. 135-152, 2023.
PERSSON, O.; Danell, R.; Schneider, J. How to use bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A Festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th Birthday, v. 5, p. 9-24, 2009.
POOL, S. L.; DAVIS, J. R. Space medicine roots: a historical perspective for the current direction. Aviation, space, and environmental medicine, v. 78, n. 4, p. A3-A4, 2007.
RESTREPO-ARANGO, C. Identification of the research themes of Choco in the literature indexed in Scopus. Investigacion Bibliotecologica, v. 38, n. 98, p. 99-120, 2024.
SEMA, K. Scientific productivity of researchers from the National University of Asuncion (UNA): verification of the Lotka model. Library Science Research and Information, v. 37, n. 96, p. 170-200, 2023.
SHARIATI, S. H.; ZAREIY, S. History of aerospace medicine. Ebnesina, v. 12, n. 2, p. 28-31, 2009. https://www.asma.org/journal
TASKIN, Z.; AYDINOGLU, A. U. Collaborative Interdisciplinary astrobiology research: a bibliometric study of the Nasa Astrobiology Institute. Scientometrics, v. 103, n. 3, p. 1003-1022, 2015.
VAN ECK, N. J.; WALTMAN, L. Citation-based clustering of publications using citnetexplorer and vosviewer. Scientometrics, v. 111, p. 1053-1070, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
ZHANG, X. M.; Zhang, X.; Luo, X.; Guo, H. T.; Zhang, L.; Guo, J. W. Knowledge mapping visualization analysis of the military health and medicine papers published in the web of science over the past 10 years. Military Medical Research, v. 4, p. 1-10, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-017-0131-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dinakaran Munnu, Gomathi Palanisamy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0, allowing the sharing of work and recognition of the work of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately, non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (ex.: distribute to an institutional repository or publish as a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to distribute their work online (eg.: in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the editorial process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and citation the published work.