Indicadores de C&T e seu uso em Política Científica

Autores/as

  • Lea Velho Universidade de Campinas

Palabras clave:

.

Resumen

Este artigo apresenta uma reflexão sobre o uso que os indicadores quantitativos de C&T têm tido para a tomada de decisão em políticas para o setor. Para isto, são mencionadas, de maneira suscinta, as principais iniciativas no sentido de compilar informações e produzir indicadores em alguns países. Em seguida, apresenta-se uma série de evidências de que, até o presente, os órgãos responsáveis pela política de C&T nos diversos países têm feito muito pouco uso desses indicadores. Aí principais razões para este fato são, então, apontadas e discutidas. Finalmente, são feitas algumas considerações de ordem geral que deveríam ser observadas para que seja possível aproximar os produtores de indicadores dos tomadores de decisão.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Lea Velho, Universidade de Campinas

Departamento de Política Científica e Tecnológica, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade de Campinas, SP.

Citas

ARREGUI, P., .’Regional Databases and S&T Development

Indicators: Problems, Achievements and Utilization of GRADE’S Latin

American Database”, in R.Arvanitis 8c J.Gaillard (eds), Science

Indicators for Developing Countries. Paris: Editions de l’ORSTOM, pp.

- 601, 1991.

BOND, J.S., ..The Challenges of Quantifying the S&T Enterprise,

in M.O.Meredith etal, AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook.

Washington DC: AAAS Press, pp.279-283, 1991.

CALLON, M.;J. LAW&A. RIP. Qualitative Bibliometrics. New York:

Macmillan, 1986.

CHUBIN, D.E., “Research Evaluation and the Generation of Big

Science Policy”, Knowledge: Creation. Diffusion. Utilization, vol 9, na

, pp.254-277, 1988.

CHUBIN, D.E. 8c E.J. HACKETT, Peerless Science. Albany: State

University of New York Press, 1990.

CHUBIN, D.E. &E.M. ROBINSON, “Data on the Federal Research

System in the United States”, Knowledge: Creation. Diffusion.

Utilization, vol. 1 3, ns 1, pp.49-78, 1991.

DE HEMPTINNE, I.P.S.A. & J. MBA-NZE, “The Measurement of

National Scientific and Technological Potential for Policy-Making

Purposes”, in R.Arvanitis 8c J.Gaillard (eds), Science Indicators for

Developing Countries. Paris: Editions de l’ORSTOM, pp. 619-630,1992.

PRAME, J.D., “Science Indicators in Science Policy Formulation”,

Scientia Yuguslavica, vol.6, pp.67-73, 1980.

HALL, N., “SERC Ignores the UGC Ranking”, Times Higher

Education Element, vol.9. pp. 5-7, 1987.

HOLMFELD, J.D., “Broadening the Use of Quantitative

Information in Science Policy”, in M.O.Meredith et al, AAAS Science

and Technology Policy Yearbook. Washington DC: AAAS Press, pp.285-

, 1991.

IRVINE, J. 8c B. MARTIN, “Es Possible Valorar la Investigación

Pura?”, Mundo Cientifico, vol. 12, na 11 , pp. 162-195, 1982.

IRYINE, J. 8c B. MARTIN, “Assessing Basic Research: the Case of

the Isaac Newton Telescope”, Social Studies of Science, vol. 13, pp.49-86,

IRVINE, J. 8c B. MARTIN, ..Basic Research in the East and West: a

Comparison of the Scientific Performance of High-Energy Physics Accelerators”, Social Studies of Science, vol. 1 5, pp.293-341, 1985.

IRVINE, J.; B. MARTIN & G. OLDHAM, “Research Evaluation in

British Science: a SPRU Review”, SPRU, Sussex University, Occasional

Paper, mimeo, 62p, 1983.

MARTIN, B. &J. IRVINE, “Assessing Basic Research: Some Partial

Indicators of Scientific Progress in Radioastronomy”, Research Policy.

vol. 12, pp.61 -90, 1983.

MARTIN, B. & J. IRVINE, “CERN: Past Performance and Future

Prospects -I. CERN’s Position in World High-Energy Physics”, Research

Policy, vol. 13, pp. 183-210, 1984.

NEDERHOF, A.J. & A.PJ. VAN RAAN, “The Use and Development

of Science and Technology Indicators for Policy Making in Five

Countries: a Comparison”, in A.EJ. van Raan; AJ.Nederhof 8c H.F.Moed.

Science and Technology Indicators. Their Use in Science y and Their

Role in Science Studies. Leiden: DSWO Press, pp. 193-211, 1989.

NOONAN, N.E., “Compiling Data on Science and Engineering for

the US Budget”, in M.O.Meredith et al, AAAS Science and Technology

Policy Yearbook. Washington DC: AAAS Press, pp.303-305, 1991.

OFFICE FOR TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, “Research Funding

as an Investment: Can We Measure the Results? -A Technical

Memorandum”, Washington, DC: U.S. Congress, OTA-TM-SET-36, 1986.

PAVITT, K., “The Size and Structure of British Technology

Activities: What We Do and Do Not Know”, Scientometrics. vol.14,

pp.329-346, 1988.

PHILLIMORE, A.J., “University Research Performance Indicators

in Practice: the University Grants Committee’s Evaluation of British

Universities,1985-86", Research Policy, vol.18. pp. 255-271, 1989.

RIP, A. &J. P. COURTIAL, “Co-word Maps of Biotechnologies: an

Example of Cognitive Scientometrics”, Scientometrics. vol.6, pp.381

, 1984.

RONAYNE.J., “Indicators and Outrage: Assessing Basic Research”,

Metascience, vol.3. pp.32-44, 1985.

VAN SPIEGEL, E., “A Policy View on Science and Technology

Indicators”, in A.FJ. van Raan; AJ.Nederhof & H.F.Moed. Science and

Technology Indicators. Their Use in Science Policy and Their Role in

Science Studies. Leiden: DSWO Press, pp.9-15, 1989.

WADE, N., .’Citation Analysis: a New Tool for Science

Administrators”. Science, vol.188 (2 de maio), pp.429-432, 1975.

Publicado

2022-08-12

Cómo citar

Velho, L. . (2022). Indicadores de C&T e seu uso em Política Científica. Sociedade E Estado, 7(01 e 02), 63–78. Recuperado a partir de https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/sociedade/article/view/43768