Indicadores de C&T e seu uso em Política Científica
Palavras-chave:
.Resumo
Este artigo apresenta uma reflexão sobre o uso que os indicadores quantitativos de C&T têm tido para a tomada de decisão em políticas para o setor. Para isto, são mencionadas, de maneira suscinta, as principais iniciativas no sentido de compilar informações e produzir indicadores em alguns países. Em seguida, apresenta-se uma série de evidências de que, até o presente, os órgãos responsáveis pela política de C&T nos diversos países têm feito muito pouco uso desses indicadores. Aí principais razões para este fato são, então, apontadas e discutidas. Finalmente, são feitas algumas considerações de ordem geral que deveríam ser observadas para que seja possível aproximar os produtores de indicadores dos tomadores de decisão.
Downloads
Referências
ARREGUI, P., .’Regional Databases and S&T Development
Indicators: Problems, Achievements and Utilization of GRADE’S Latin
American Database”, in R.Arvanitis 8c J.Gaillard (eds), Science
Indicators for Developing Countries. Paris: Editions de l’ORSTOM, pp.
- 601, 1991.
BOND, J.S., ..The Challenges of Quantifying the S&T Enterprise,
in M.O.Meredith etal, AAAS Science and Technology Policy Yearbook.
Washington DC: AAAS Press, pp.279-283, 1991.
CALLON, M.;J. LAW&A. RIP. Qualitative Bibliometrics. New York:
Macmillan, 1986.
CHUBIN, D.E., “Research Evaluation and the Generation of Big
Science Policy”, Knowledge: Creation. Diffusion. Utilization, vol 9, na
, pp.254-277, 1988.
CHUBIN, D.E. 8c E.J. HACKETT, Peerless Science. Albany: State
University of New York Press, 1990.
CHUBIN, D.E. &E.M. ROBINSON, “Data on the Federal Research
System in the United States”, Knowledge: Creation. Diffusion.
Utilization, vol. 1 3, ns 1, pp.49-78, 1991.
DE HEMPTINNE, I.P.S.A. & J. MBA-NZE, “The Measurement of
National Scientific and Technological Potential for Policy-Making
Purposes”, in R.Arvanitis 8c J.Gaillard (eds), Science Indicators for
Developing Countries. Paris: Editions de l’ORSTOM, pp. 619-630,1992.
PRAME, J.D., “Science Indicators in Science Policy Formulation”,
Scientia Yuguslavica, vol.6, pp.67-73, 1980.
HALL, N., “SERC Ignores the UGC Ranking”, Times Higher
Education Element, vol.9. pp. 5-7, 1987.
HOLMFELD, J.D., “Broadening the Use of Quantitative
Information in Science Policy”, in M.O.Meredith et al, AAAS Science
and Technology Policy Yearbook. Washington DC: AAAS Press, pp.285-
, 1991.
IRVINE, J. 8c B. MARTIN, “Es Possible Valorar la Investigación
Pura?”, Mundo Cientifico, vol. 12, na 11 , pp. 162-195, 1982.
IRYINE, J. 8c B. MARTIN, “Assessing Basic Research: the Case of
the Isaac Newton Telescope”, Social Studies of Science, vol. 13, pp.49-86,
IRVINE, J. 8c B. MARTIN, ..Basic Research in the East and West: a
Comparison of the Scientific Performance of High-Energy Physics Accelerators”, Social Studies of Science, vol. 1 5, pp.293-341, 1985.
IRVINE, J.; B. MARTIN & G. OLDHAM, “Research Evaluation in
British Science: a SPRU Review”, SPRU, Sussex University, Occasional
Paper, mimeo, 62p, 1983.
MARTIN, B. &J. IRVINE, “Assessing Basic Research: Some Partial
Indicators of Scientific Progress in Radioastronomy”, Research Policy.
vol. 12, pp.61 -90, 1983.
MARTIN, B. & J. IRVINE, “CERN: Past Performance and Future
Prospects -I. CERN’s Position in World High-Energy Physics”, Research
Policy, vol. 13, pp. 183-210, 1984.
NEDERHOF, A.J. & A.PJ. VAN RAAN, “The Use and Development
of Science and Technology Indicators for Policy Making in Five
Countries: a Comparison”, in A.EJ. van Raan; AJ.Nederhof 8c H.F.Moed.
Science and Technology Indicators. Their Use in Science y and Their
Role in Science Studies. Leiden: DSWO Press, pp. 193-211, 1989.
NOONAN, N.E., “Compiling Data on Science and Engineering for
the US Budget”, in M.O.Meredith et al, AAAS Science and Technology
Policy Yearbook. Washington DC: AAAS Press, pp.303-305, 1991.
OFFICE FOR TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, “Research Funding
as an Investment: Can We Measure the Results? -A Technical
Memorandum”, Washington, DC: U.S. Congress, OTA-TM-SET-36, 1986.
PAVITT, K., “The Size and Structure of British Technology
Activities: What We Do and Do Not Know”, Scientometrics. vol.14,
pp.329-346, 1988.
PHILLIMORE, A.J., “University Research Performance Indicators
in Practice: the University Grants Committee’s Evaluation of British
Universities,1985-86", Research Policy, vol.18. pp. 255-271, 1989.
RIP, A. &J. P. COURTIAL, “Co-word Maps of Biotechnologies: an
Example of Cognitive Scientometrics”, Scientometrics. vol.6, pp.381
, 1984.
RONAYNE.J., “Indicators and Outrage: Assessing Basic Research”,
Metascience, vol.3. pp.32-44, 1985.
VAN SPIEGEL, E., “A Policy View on Science and Technology
Indicators”, in A.FJ. van Raan; AJ.Nederhof & H.F.Moed. Science and
Technology Indicators. Their Use in Science Policy and Their Role in
Science Studies. Leiden: DSWO Press, pp.9-15, 1989.
WADE, N., .’Citation Analysis: a New Tool for Science
Administrators”. Science, vol.188 (2 de maio), pp.429-432, 1975.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Sociedade e Estado
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
.jpg)
