COMPARACAO DE METODOLOGIAS CFD DE SIMULACAO DE TURBINAS HIDROCINETICAS

Authors

  • Rafael Castilho Faria Mendes UnB
  • Marianela Machuca Macias UnB
  • Paulo Augusto Strobel Freitas Silva UnB
  • Taygoara Felamingo de Oliveira UnB
  • Antonio Cesar Pinho Brasil Junior UnB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/ripe.v2i4.21467

Keywords:

Hydrokinetic turbine. Full rotor method. Blade method. CFD.

Abstract

The recent advances in technologies turned able that a computer provides a numerical simulation of fluid flows, well known as Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) technique. It means that the physical laws that govern the fluid behavior is in a “virtual” environment, where we can visualise the whole prototype system, such as a turbine, and how it works with great levels of realism. For many reasons, such as turbulence level and computational resource available, it is often impossible to describe the entire system with its all details. Consequently,we simplify the problem as much as possible to achieve the solution. In this sense, the aim of this work is to assess two different methodologies of CFD simulations of a 3 blade hydrokinetic turbine: full rotor and just one blade with symmetry simplification. As a result of it, the simulation of one blade rotor showed similar values of torque and pressure coefficient with the full rotor case.Thereby, this simplification presented the same level of results with a third of mesh.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

B. Blocken. 50 years of computational wind engineering: Past, present and future. Journal of

Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 129:69 ”“ 102, 2014. ISSN 0167-6105.

P. A. S. F. e Silva. Estudo num´erico de turbinas hidrocin´eticas de eixo horizontal. Dissertac¸ ˜ao

de Mestrado UnB, 2014.

C. Friess, R. Manceau, and T. Gatski. Toward an equivalence criterion for hybrid rans/les

methods. Computers & Fluids, 122:233 ”“ 246, 2015. ISSN 0045-7930.

J. Frihlich and D. von Terzi. Hybrid les/rans methods for the simulation of turbulent flows.

Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 44(5):349 ”“ 377, 2008. ISSN 0376-0421.

H. Gopalan, S. Heinz, and M. K. St¨Ä±¿½llinger. A unified rans-les model: Computational development,

accuracy and cost. Journal of Computational Physics, 249:249 ”“ 274, 2013. ISSN

-9991.

M. Khan, G. Bhuyan, M. Iqbal, and J. Quaicoe. Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems and

assessment of horizontal and vertical axis turbines for river and tidal applications: A technology

status review. Applied Energy, 86(10):1823 ”“ 1835, 2009. ISSN 0306-2619.

T. Kinsey, G. Dumas, G. Lalande, J. Ruel, A. M¨Ä±¿½hut, P. Viarouge, J. Lemay, and Y. Jean.

Prototype testing of a hydrokinetic turbine based on oscillating hydrofoils. Renewable Energy,

(6):1710 ”“ 1718, 2011. ISSN 0960-1481.

S. G. Lee, S. J. Park, K. S. Lee, and C. Chung. Performance prediction of fNRELg (national

renewable energy laboratory) phase fVIg blade adopting blunt trailing edge airfoil. Energy, 47

(1):47 ”“ 61, 2012. ISSN 0360-5442. Asia-Pacific Forum on Renewable Energy 2011.

L. E. Lignarolo, D. Mehta, R. J. Stevens, A. E. Yilmaz, G. van Kuik, S. J. Andersen, C. Meneveau,

C. J. Ferreira, D. Ragni, J. Meyers, G. J. van Bussel, and J. Holierhoek. Validation of four

les and a vortex model against stereo-piv measurements in the near wake of an actuator disc and

a wind turbine. Renewable Energy, 94:510 ”“ 523, 2016. ISSN 0960-1481.

M. M. Mac´Ä±as. Estudo experimental em t´unel de vento de turbinas de eixo horizontal.

Dissertac¸ ˜ao de Mestrado UnB, 2016.

D. Mehta, A. van Zuijlen, B. Koren, J. Holierhoek, and H. Bijl. Large eddy simulation of wind

farm aerodynamics: A review. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 133:

”“ 17, 2014. ISSN 0167-6105.

R. C. F. Mendes. Estudo do fator de induc¸ ˜ao axial em turbinas de eixo horizontal. Dissertac¸ ˜ao

de Mestrado UnB, 2015.

F. Menter. Zonal two equation k-w turbulence models for aerodynamic flows. in: Fluid dynamics

and co-located conferences. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics,, 1993.

F. R. Menter. Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications.

AIAA Journal, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, v. 32, n. 8, p. 1598¨Ä±¿½1605,

ago. 1994. ISSN 0001-1452, 1994.

J.-O. Mo and Y.-H. Lee. Cfd investigation on the aerodynamic characteristics of a small-sized

wind turbine of nrel phase vi operating with a stall-regulated method. Journal of Mechanical

Science and Technology, 26(1):81”“92, 2012. ISSN 1738-494X.

M. Moshfeghi, Y. J. Song, and Y. H. Xie. Effects of near-wall grid spacing on sst-k-! model

using fNRELg phase fVIg horizontal axis wind turbine. Journal of Wind Engineering and

Industrial Aerodynamics, 107108(0):94 ”“ 105, 2012. ISSN 0167-6105.

A. Schaffarczyk. Introduction to Wind Turbine Aerodynamics. Springer, 2014.

N. N. Sorensen, J. Michelsen, and S. Schreck. Navier-stokes predictions of the nrel phase vi

rotor in the nasa ames 80 ft x 120 ft wind tunnel. Wind Energy, 5:151”“169, 2002.

P. R. Spalart,W. H. Jou, M. Stretlets, and S. R. Allmaras. Comments on the feasibility of les for

wings and on the hybrid rans/les approach. In Advances in DNS/LES, Proceedings of the First

AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, 1997.

M. Strelets. Detached eddy simulation of massively separated flows. In AIAA, 2001.

Y. Zhiyin. Large-eddy simulation: Past, present and the future. Chinese Journal of Aeronautics,

(1):11 ”“ 24, 2015. ISSN 1000-9361.

Published

2017-01-10

How to Cite

Mendes, R. C. F., Macias, M. M., Silva, P. A. S. F., Oliveira, T. F. de, & Brasil Junior, A. C. P. (2017). COMPARACAO DE METODOLOGIAS CFD DE SIMULACAO DE TURBINAS HIDROCINETICAS. Revista Interdisciplinar De Pesquisa Em Engenharia, 2(4), 195–204. https://doi.org/10.26512/ripe.v2i4.21467