Bridging the Gaps in Social Life Cycle Assessment
Theoretical and Practical Contributions
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e39501.enMots-clés :
Social life cycle assessment, Social impact, Sustainable development, Labour psychology, TransdisciplinarityRésumé
Sustainable development is based on three pillars: environment preservation, cost-effective production and human development. Within this context, emerges Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), a solid methodology for assessing the impact of products and services. Whereas Social LCA (S-LCA) is an early-stage approach, currently under development, requiring theoretical and methodological improvements. This study aimed at mapping the main gaps in S-LCA to identify potential contributions from the Psychology field. A preliminary literature review indicated several constraints: consensus between social indicators; methods for measuring subjective data; predominance of secondary data; underutilization of the Social Sciences, etc. Therefore, this study outlines multiples intersection points where the Social Sciences, more specifically, psychology could contribute to filling some of the theoretical and methodological gaps in S-LCA.
Téléchargements
Références
Antunes, R. (2001). Trabalho e precarização numa ordem neoliberal. In: P. Gentili & G. Frigotto (Orgs.), A cidadania negada: políticas de exclusão na educação e no trabalho (pp. 35-48). Cortez.
Antunes, R. (2006). Adeus ao Trabalho?: ensaios sobre a metamorfose e a centralidade do mundo do trabalho Cortez.
Arcese, G., Lucchetti, M.C., Massa, I., & Valente, C. (2018). State of the art in S-LCA: integrating literature review and automatic text analysis. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23, 394-405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1082-0
Benoît. C., & Mazijn. B. (Eds). (2009). Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC).
Benoît Norris, C., Traverso, M., Valdivia, S., Vickery-Niederman, G., Franze, J., Azuero, L., ... & Aulision, D . (2013). The methodological sheets for sub-categories in social life cycle assessment (S-LCA) . United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and Society for Environmental Toxicology and Chemiastry (SETAC).
Brundtland, G. H., Khalid, M., Agnelli, S., Al-Athel, S. A., Chidzero, B. J. N. Y., Fadika, L. M., ... & Singh, N. (1987). Our common future ; by world commission on environment and development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cattani, A. D. (1996). Trabalho e autonomia Vozes.
Cattani, A. D. (2004). As Desigualdades Ampliadas e as Alternativas em Construção. Caderno CRH, 17(40), 93-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v17i40.18482
Ciroth, A., & Franze, J. (2011). LCA of an ecolabeled notebook: consideration of social and environmental impacts along the entire life cycle Lulu. com.
Chabrawi, A. M. R. O. (2015). Perspectivas sociopsicológicas do trabalho na contemporaneidade sob a lógica do capitalismo e da economia solidária. Otra Economía, 10(18), 36-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.4013/otra.2016.1018.04
Dreyer, L., Hauschild, M., & Schierbeck, J. (2006). A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11(2), 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1065/lca2005.08.223
Elkington, J. (1997). The triple bottom line. Environmental management: Readings and cases, 2, 49-66.
Harvey, D. (2006). A produção capitalista do espaço 2ª edição. Annablume.
Hosseinijou, S. A., Mansour, S., & Shirazi, M. A. (2014). Social life cycle assessment for material selection: a case study of building materials. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19, 620-645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-013-0658-1
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2019) Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua.Trabalho de Crianças e Adolescentes de 5 a 17 anos de idade 2016-2019. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv101777_informativo.pdf
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2020). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua. Síntese de Indicadores 2020 https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/multidominio/condicoes-de-vida-desigualdade-e-pobreza/9171-pesquisa-nacional-por-amostra-de-domicilios-continua-mensal.html?edicao=28382&t=destaquess
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. (2022). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua. Indicadores para a População de 14 anos ou Mais https://ftp.ibge.gov.br/Trabalho_e_Rendimento/Pesquisa_Nacional_por_Amostra_de_Domicilios_continua/Trimestral/Quadro_Sintetico/2021/pnadc_202104_trimestre_quadroSintetico.pdf
International Organization for Standardization. (2016). ISO 14004:2016: Environmental management systems — General guidelines on implementation. ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/60856.html
Instituto Nacional do Seguro Social. (2021). Boletim Estatístico da Previdência Social INSS. https://www.gov.br/trabalho-e-previdencia/pt-br/acesso-a-informacao/dados-abertos/dados-abertos-previdencia/previdencia-social-regime-geral-inss/arquivos/beps092021-final.pdf
Kuhlman, T., & Farrington, J. (2010). What is Sustainability? Sustainability, 2(11), 3436-3448. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2113436
Kühnen, M., & Hahn, R. (2017). Indicators in social life cycle assessment: a review of frameworks, theories, and empirical experience. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(6), 1547-1565.
Lagarde, V. & Macombe, C. (2012). Designing the social life cycle of products from the systematic competitive model. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, 172-184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-012-0448-1
Macombe, C., Leskinen, P., Feschet, P., & Antikainen, R. (2013) Social life cycle assessment of biodiesel production at three levels: a literature review and development needs. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.03.026
Marx, K., & Engels, F . (2001). A ideologia alemã (2nd ed). Martins Fontes. Original work published in 1974).
Marx, K. (2008). Contribuição à crítica da economia política (2nd ed). Expressão Popular. (Original work published in 1983).
Ministério da Economia (2022). Base de Dados Históricos de Acidentes de Trabalho Secretaria Especial de Previdência e Trabalho. https://radarsit.economia.gov.br/extensions/RadarSIT/RadarSIT.html
Ministério da Economia (2021). Painel de Informações e Estatísticas da Inspeção do Trabalho no Brasil https://sit.trabalho.gov.br/radar/
Moltesen, A., Bonou, A., Wangel, A., & Bozhilova-Kisheva, K. P. (2018). Social life cycle assessment: An introduction. In Life Cycle Assessment (pp. 401-422). Springer, Cham.
Navarro, V. L., & Padilha, V. (2007). Dilemas do trabalho no capitalismo contemporâneo. Revista Psicologia & Sociedade, 19(119), 14-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-71822007000400004
Pochmann, M. (2019). Precarização e Tercerização: faces da mesma realidade. In: M. O. Teixeira; H. R. Andrade & E. D. Coelho (Orgs.), Tercerização, Competitividade e Uberização do Trabalho no Brasil (pp. 59-66). Sindicato dos Químicos.
Tokede, O., & Traverso, M. (2020). Implementing the guidelines for social life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25(10), 1910-1929.
Traverso, M., Finkbeiner, M., Jørgensen, A., & Schneider, L. (2012). Life cycle sustainability dashboard. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16(5), 680-688.
Uchôa-de-Oliveira, F. M. (2020). Saúde do trabalhador e o aprofundamento da uberização do trabalho em tempos de pandemia. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional, 45 https://doi.org/10.1590/2317-6369000012520
Ugaya, C. M. L., Zortea, R. B., Haberland, N.T., Ramirez, P. K. S., & Souza, A. M. (2015). Proposals for improvements in Social Life Cycle Assessment. VI International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment. Cilca,
United Nations Environment Programme. (2020). Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products and Organizations 2020. Benoît Norris, C., Traverso, M., Neugebauer, S., Ekener, E., Schaubroeck, T., Russo Garrido, S., Berger, M., Valdivia, S., Lehmann, A., Finkbeiner, M., Arcese, G. (eds.).
Vigon, B. W., & Jensen, A. A. (1995). Life cycle assessment: data quality and databases practitioner survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 3(3), 135-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-6526(94)00001-H
Waldekker, B., & Molnar, S. (2014). Social LCA at SP: Challenges and opportunities. Technical Research Institute of Sweden Report. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:962861/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Wiersum, K. F. (1995). 200 Years of Sustainability in Forestry: Lessons from History. Environmental Management, 19(3), 321-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02471975
Wu, R., Yang, D., & Chen, J. (2014). Social Life Cycle Assessment Revisited. Sustainability, 6(7), 4200-4226. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6074200
Téléchargements
Publié-e
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
(c) Tous droits réservés Arij Mohamad Radwan Omar Chabrawi, Josemberg Moura de Andrade, Marzia Traverzo, Cássia Maria Lie Ugaya 2023
Cette œuvre est sous licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
