Applicability of Item Mapping in Rating the Severity of Pathological Personality Traits
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e34424Palabras clave:
Personality disorders, Personality traits, Psychiatric disordersResumen
The aim of this study was to investigate the combined use of two pathological personality tests, the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory (IDCP) and the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5), within the context of incremental validity in order to verify the increasing severity of the constructs used. We generated item maps for sets of items based on three dimensions of IDCP and five facets of PID-5, selected according to the possibility of pairing between scales. The study included 642 individuals, predominantly women aged over 18, divided into three groups according to the dimensions and facets. There was an increase in the level of severity, typically related to the different personality disorders, in addition to the complementation between instruments, providing incremental validity. The use of item mapping helped us understand the increasing severity of the traits, and allowed the verification of the clinical relevance of the constructs.
Descargas
Citas
Al-Dajani, N., Gralnick, T. M., & Bagby, R. M. (2016). A psychometric review of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Current status and future directions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(1), 62-81. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2015.1107572
Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Bagby, R. M., Quilty, L. C., Veltri, C. O. C., Markon, K. E., & Krueger, R. F. (2013). On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets: implications for assessment of DSM-5 personality traits. Assessment, 20(3), 286-294. doi: 10.1177/1073191112471141
Anderson, J. L., Sellbom, M., Ayearst, M., Quilty, L. C., Chmielewski, M., & Bagby, R. M. (2015). Associations Between DSM-5 Section III Personality Traits and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory 2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2RF) Scales in a Psychiatric Patient Sample. Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 801-815. doi: 10.1037/pas0000096
American Psychiatric Association. (2003). Manual Diagnóstico e Estatístico de Transtornos Mentais - DSM-IV-TR (4ª ed.). Porto Alegre: Artmed.
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th Edition).Washington.
Carvalho, L. F., Bartholomeu, D., & Silva, M. C. R. (2010). Instrumentos para Avaliação dos Transtornos da Personalidade no Brasil. Avaliação Psicológica, 9(2), 289-298. Retrieved from http://pepsic.bvsalud.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-04712010000200013
Carvalho, L. F., & Primi, R. (2015). Development and internal structure investigation of the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory (IDCP). Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 28(2), 213-221. doi: 10.1590/1678-7153.201528212
Carvalho, L. F., & Primi, R. (2016). Prototype Matching of Personality Disorders with the Dimensional Clinical Personality Inventory. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 32(2), 1-9. doi: 10.1590/0102-3772e322214
Carvalho, L. F., Primi, R., & Meyer, G. J. (2012). Application of the rasch model in measuring personality disorders .Trends in Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, 34(2), 101-109. doi: 10.1590/S2237-60892012000200009
Carvalho, L. F., Primi, R., & Stone, G. E. (2014). Psychometric Properties of the Inventário Dimensional Clínico da Personalidade (IDCP) using the Rating Scale Model. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 32(3), 433-446. doi: 10.12804/apl32.03.2014.09
Elliott, R., Fox, C. M., Beltyukova, S. A., Stone, G. E., Gunderson, J., & Zhang, Xi. (2006). Deconstructing therapy outcome measurement with Rasch analysis: The SCL-90-R. Psychological Assessment, 18, 359-372. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.4.359
Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2000). Item Response Theory for psychologists. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hattie, J. (1985). Methodology review: Assessing unidimensionality of tests and ltems. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(2), 139-164. Retrieved from https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/102073/v09n2p139.pdf?sequence=1
Hunsley, J., & Meyer, G. (2003). The incremental validity of psychological testing and assessment: Conceptual, methodological, and statistical issues. Psychological Assessment, 15(4), 446-455. Doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.15.4.446
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42(9), 1879-1890. doi: 10.1017/S0033291711002674
Linacre, J. M. (2009). Winsteps. Beaverton, Oregon: Winsteps.com.
Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (1991). WINSTEPS-Rasch-Model computer programs. Chicago: MESA Press.
Meyer, G. J. (1999). Incremental Validity of the Rorschach Prognostic Rating Scale Over the MMPI Ego Strength Scale and IQ. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 223-225. Doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7403_2
Millon, T. (2011). Disorders of Personality: introducing a DSM/ICD spectrum from normal to abnormal. New Jersey: Wiley.
Morizot, J., Ainsworth, A. T., & Reise, S. P. (2007). Toward modern psychometrics: Application of item response theory models in personality research. In. R. W. Robins, R. C. Fraley, & R. F. Krueger (Eds.), Handbook or research methods in personality psychology (pp. 407-423). New York: Guilford.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978).Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Oliveira, S. E. S. (2016). Avaliação estrutural e dimensional da personalidade: estudos psicométricos e de aplicação clínica (Tese de Doutorado). Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Oliveira, S. E. S., & Krueger, R. F. (2015). Validity of the DSM-5 alternative personality disorder model in brazilian clinic and non-clinic samples. In Annual meeting of the society for research in psychopathology, 29. [Proceedings]. New Orleans: Society for Research in Psychopathology.
Paris, J. A. (2015). A concise guide to personality disorders. Washington: American Psychological Association.
Pasquali, L. (2007). Validade dos testes psicológicos: Será possível reencontrar o caminho? Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 23, 99-107. Doi: 10.1590/S0102-37722007000500019
Primi, R., Carvalho, L. F., Miguel, F. K., & Muniz, M. (2010). Resultado dos fatores da BFP por meio da Teoria de Resposta ao Item: interpretação referenciada nos itens. In C. H. S. S. Nunes, C. S. H. Hutz, & M. F. O. Nunes (Orgs.), Bateria Fatorial de Personalidade: manual técnico (pp. 153-183). São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.
Skodol, A. E., Clark, L. A., Bender, D. S., Krueger, R. F., Morey, L. C., Verheul, R., Alarcon, R. D., Oldham, J. M. (2011). Proposed changes in personality and personality disorder assessment and diagnosis for DSM-5Part I: Description and rationale. Personality Disorders Theory Research and Treatment, 2(1), 4-22. doi: 10.1037/a0021891
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Educational, 2, 53-55. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Thomas, K. M.; Yalch, M. M.; Krueger, R. F.; Wright, A. G. C.; Markon, K. E.; & Hopwood, C. J. (2013). The Convergent Structure of DSM-5 Personality Trait Facets and Five-Factor Model Trait Domains. Assessment, 20(3), 308-311. doi: 10.1177/1073191112457589.
Zuccolo, P. F., Corchs, F., & Savoia, M. G. (2013). Psicopatologias e o conceito da Personalidade. In L. F. Carvalho & R. Primi (Eds.), Perspectivas em psicologia dos transtornos da personalidade (pp. 8-23). São Paulo: Casa do Psicólogo.
