The Role of Arousal and Retention Interval on Eyewitness Memory

Authors

  • Renan Benigno Saraiva Departamento de Psicologia, University of Portsmouth, Portsmouth, Reino Unido http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9461-7594
  • Lara Souza Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil
  • Raiane Nogueira Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil
  • Letícia Coelho Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil
  • Luciana Alarcão Instituto de Psicologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, DF, Brasil

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e37211

Keywords:

Eyewitness testimony, Arousal, Retention interval, Memory

Abstract

Witnessing a crime can be a highly stressful situation, eliciting arousal levels that may affect eyewitness memory performance. In two experiments, participants watched a mock crime with varying arousal intensities (neutral, robbery, and murder), and provided reports after varying retention intervals (immediate testing, 7 days, 14 days or 21 days). Results showed that arousal did not have a significant main effect on eyewitness memory recall. Eyewitness memory performance was stronger for the event with higher arousal only after a 7 days retention interval, but performance was comparable across all arousal conditions in longer retention intervals. Theoretical and practical implications related to the evaluation of eyewitness testimony are discussed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baddeley, A. D. (1997). Human memory: Theory and practice. Psychology Press.

Behrman, B. W., & Davey, S. L. (2001). Eyewitness identification in actual criminal cases: An archival analysis. Law and Human Behavior, 25(5), 475-491. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012840831846

Biaggio, A., & Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Inventário de ansiedade traço-estado, Idate-C Manual. Centro de Psicologia Aplicada.

Bornstein, B. H., Deffenbacher, K. A., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2012). Effects of exposure time and cognitive operations on facial identification accuracy: a meta-analysis of two variables associated with initial memory strength. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18(5), 473-490. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2010.508458

Brown, J. M. (2003). Eyewitness memory for arousing events: Putting things into context. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17(1), 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.848

Burke, A., Heuer, F., & Reisberg, D. (1992). Remembering emotional events. Memory & Cognition, 20(3), 277-290. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199665

Christianson, S. A. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 284-309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.284

Christianson, S. A., & Hubinette, B. (1993). Hands up! A study of witnesses and memories associated with bank robberies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 365-379. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350070502

Christianson, S. Ã…., & Loftus, E. F. (1991). Remembering emotional events: The fate of detailed information.Cognition & Emotion, 5(2), 81-108. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939108411027

Deffenbacher, K. A. (1983). The influence of arousal on reliability of testimony. In S. M. A. Lloyd-Boystock, & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence: Recent psychological research and new perspectives (pp. 235-251). John Wiley & Sons.

Deffenbacher, K. A. (1994). Effects of arousal on everyday memory. Human Performance, 7(2), 141-161. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0702_3

Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28(6), 687-706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-004-0565-x

Dutton, A., & Carroll, M. (2001). Eyewitness testimony: Effects of source of arousal on memory, source-monitoring, and metamemory judgments. Australian Journal of Psychology, 53(2), 83-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530108255128

Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66, 183-201. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0047707

Ebbesen, E. B., & Rienick, C. B. (1998). Retention interval and eyewitness memory for events and personal identifying attributes. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(5), 745-762. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.5.745

Levine, L. J., & Edelstein, R. S. (2009). Emotion and memory narrowing: A review and goal-relevance approach. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 178-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902738863

Gold, J. M., Murray, R. F., Sekuler, A. B., Bennett, P. J., & Sekuler, R. (2005). Visual memory decay is deterministic. Psychological Science, 16(10), 769-774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01612.x

Hellhammer, J., & Schubert, M. (2012). The physiological response to Trier Social Stress Test relates to subjective measures of stress during but not before or after the test. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37(1), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.05.012

Heuer, F., & Reisberg, D. (1992). Emotion, arousal and memory for detail. In S. A. Christianson (Ed.). The handbook of emotion and memory: Research and theory (pp. 151-180). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hope, L., Gabbert, F., Fisher, R. P., & Jamieson, K. (2014). Protecting and enhancing eyewitness memory: The impact of an initial recall attempt on performance in an investigative interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 28(3), 304-313. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2984

Houston, K. A., Clifford, B. R., Phillips, L. H., & Memon A. (2013). The emotional eyewitness: The effects of emotion on specific aspects of eyewitness recall and recognition performance. Emotion, 13(1), 118-128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029220

Ibabe, I., & Sporer, S. L. (2004). How you ask is what you get: On the influence of question form on accuracy and confidence. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 711-726. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1025

Kleinsmith, L. J., & Kaplan, S. (1964). Interaction of arousal and recall interval in nonsense syllable paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(2), 124-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045203

Kleinsmith, L. J., Kaplan, S., & Trate, R. D. (1963). The relationship of arousal to short- and long-term verbal recall. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 17(4), 393-397. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0083278

Kneller, W., Memon, A., & Stevenage, S. (2001). Simultaneous and sequential lineups: Decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15(6), 659-671. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.739

Lindsay, R. C. L., Ross, D. F., Read, J. D., & Toglia, M. P. (Eds.). (2013). The Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology: Volume II: Memory for people. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Memon, A., Hope, L., & Bull, R. (2003). Exposure duration: Effects on eyewitness accuracy and confidence. British Journal of Psychology, 94(3), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712603767876262

Morgan, C. A., Hazlett, G., Doran, A., Garrett, S., Hoyt, G., Thomas, P., … Southwick, S. M. (2004). Accuracy of eyewitness memory for persons encountered during exposure to highly intense stress. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27(3), 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2004.03.004

Park, J. (2005). Effect of arousal and retention delay on memory: a meta-analysis. Psychological Reports, 97(2), 339-355. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.97.2.339-355

Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7(1), 1-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/1041-6080(95)90031-4

Roemer, L., Litz, B., Orsillo, S. M., Ehlich, P. J., & Friedman, M. J. (1998). Increases in retrospective accounts of war-zone exposure over time: The role of PTSD symptom severity. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 11(3), 597-605. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024469116047

Safer, M. A., Christianson, S. Ã…., Autry, M. W., & Österlund, K. (1998). Tunnel memory for traumatic events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12(2), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024469116047

Saraiva, R., & Castilho, G. M. (Eds.). (2018). Psicologia do testemunho ocular: Aplicações no contexto forense e criminal. Juruá.

Saraiva, R. B., Castilho, G. M. de, Nogueira, R. N., Coelho, L. de A. M., Alarcão, L. C. P., & Lage, J. (2017). Memória de testemunhas oculares para faces em casos criminais: Uma análise de arquivo de retratos falados positivos. Estudos de Psicologia (Natal), 22(3), 247-256. https://doi.org/10.5935/1678-4669.20170025

Saraiva, R. B., Iglesias, F., Micas, G. F., Araújo, C. P. N., Lima, C. C., & Costa, M. D. V. (2015). Conformidade entre testemunhas oculares: Efeitos de falsas informações nos relatos criminais. Psico-USF, 20(1), 87-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-82712015200108

Sauer, J., Brewer, N., Zweck, T., & Weber, N. (2010). The effect of retention interval on the confidence-accuracy relationship for eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 34(4), 337-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9192-x

Sauerland, M., Raymaekers, L. H. C., Otgaar, H., Memon, A., Waltjen, T. T., Nivo, M., … Smeets, T. (2016). Stress, stress-induced cortisol responses, and eyewitness identification performance. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 34(4), 580-594. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2249

Southwick, S. M., Morgan III, C. A., Nicolaou, A. L., & Charney, D. S. (1997). Consistency of memory for combat-related traumatic events in veterans of operation desert storm. American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 173-177. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.154.2.173

Sporer, S. L. (1993). Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence, and decision times in simultaneous and sequential lineups. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.22

The Innocence Project. (2020). DNA Exonerations in the United States. Recuperado 29 de Junho, 2020. http://www.innocenceproject.org/dna-exonerations-in-the-united-states/

Wetmore, S. A., Neuschatz, J. S., Gronlund, S. D., Wooten, A., Goodsell, C. A., & Carlson, C. A. (2015). Effect of retention interval on showup and lineup performance. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.003

Wessel, I., & Merckelbach, H. (1994). Characteristics of traumatic memories in normal subjects. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 22(04), 315-324. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352465800013199

Wixted, J. T., Don Read, J., & Stephen Lindsay, D. (2016/6). The effect of retention interval on the eyewitness identification confidence-accuracy relationship. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 5(2), 192-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2016.04.006

Woolnough, P. S., & MacLeod, M. D. (2001). Watching the birdie watching you: Eyewitness memory for actions using CCTV recordings of actual crimes. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 395-411. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.717

Yerkes, R. M., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-information. Journal of Comparative Neurology of Psychology, 18, 459-482. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.920180503

Yuille, J. C. (2013). The challenge for forensic memory research: Methodolotry. In B. S. Cooper, D. Griesel, & M. Ternes (Eds.). Applied Issues in Investigative Interviewing, Eyewitness Memory, and Credibility Assessment (pp. 3-18). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5547-9_1

Published

2021-02-01

How to Cite

Benigno Saraiva, R., Souza, L. ., Nogueira, R., Coelho, L. ., & Alarcão, L. . (2021). The Role of Arousal and Retention Interval on Eyewitness Memory. Psicologia: Teoria E Pesquisa, 37. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e37211

Issue

Section

Artigos

Most read articles by the same author(s)