Social identification and / or perception of similarity

An approach to differential effects on ingroup and outgroup essentialism

Authors

  • Katherine Saldivia Ojeda Universidad de Magallanes
  • Débora Mansilla Cofré Universidad de Magallanes
  • Claudia Andrea Estrada Goic Universidad de Magallanes

Keywords:

Social psychology, Essentialism, Social identity

Abstract

The present study deals with the causal relation among two processes associated to essentialism (believing
in the existence of a common essence for the members of a group): social identification and similarity. By means of a crosscorrelational study, 200 participants (non-random sampling) were measured on both variables and on essentialism (ingroup/outgroup). The results indicate that the effects of both variables are not similar according to whether they belong to ingroup or outgroup essentialism. Ingroup essentialism is mainly explained by identification with the ingroup, and, especially for selfcategorization and group commitment. The outgroup essentialism, meanwhile, is explained by self-categorization (identification)
and the perception of intragroup homogeneity (similarity). These results are discussed in relation to their implications for intergroup relations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alarcón, P., & Estrada, C. (2011). Estudio de estereotipo y metaestereotipo

de una muestra de población chilota residente en

la ciudad de Punta Arenas. Salud & Sociedad, 2(3), 299-309.

Allport, G. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison

Wesley.

Bastian, B., & Haslam. N. (2008). Psychological essentialism and

social identification: Immigration from two perspectives. Asian

Journal of Social Psychology, 11, 127-140

Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self ”“ On being the same and

different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology

Bulletin. 17(5), 475-482

Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. New York: Academic

Press.

Calquín, D., & Estrada, C. (2011). Esencialismo, su impacto

en la percepción de similitud y el uso de diferente tipo de

información en la formación de impresión. Psykhe, 20(1),

-75.

Campbell, D. T. (1958). Common fate, similarity, and other

indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities.

Behavioral Science, 3, 14-25

Castano, E. (2004). In case of death, cling to the ingroup. European

Journal of Social Psychology, 34(4), 375-384.

Codol, J. P. (1979). Semblables et différents. Recherche sur la quête

de la similitude et de la différenciation sociale [Semejantes y

diferentes. Investigación sobre la búsqueda de la similitud y

la diferenciación social] (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation).

Université de Provence, Aix en Provence, Francia.

Corneille, O., & Leyens, J-Ph. (1994). Catégories, catégorisation

sociale et essentialisme psychologique. In R. Y. Bourhis &

J- Ph. Leyens (Eds.), Stéréotypes, discrimination et relations

intergroupes (pp. 4268). Bruxelles: Mardaga.

Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.-Ph., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2006). Lay theories

of essentialism. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations,

, 25-42.

Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. (1999). Selfcategorization,

commitment to the group and group self-esteem

as related but distinct aspect of social identity. European

Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 371-389.

Estrada, C. (2003). L’impact de l’essentialisme psychologique

sur les processus intra- et intergroupe (Unpublished doctoral

dissertation). Universidad Católica de Lovaina, Lovaina la

Nueva, Bélgica.

Estrada, C. (2009). El impacto del esencialismo psicológico sobre

la percepción de la disidencia intragrupal. Interamerican Journal

of Psychology, 44(2), 352-360.

Estrada, C., & Avendaño, S. (2008). ¿Consideran los magallánicos

que su cultura posee una esencia única?: Estudio descriptivo de

la aplicación de un instrumento de evaluación de esencialismo

cultural a una muestra puntarenense. Magallania, 36(2), 155-

Estrada, C., Oyarzún, M., & Yzerbyt, V. (2007). Teorías implícitas

y esencialismo psicológico: Herramientas conceptuales para el

estudio de las relaciones entre y dentro de los grupos. Psykhe,

(1), 111-121.

Estrada, C., Yzerbyt, V., & Seron, E. (2004). Efecto del esencialismo

psicológico sobre las teorías ingenuas de las diferencias

grupales. Psicothema, 16(2), 81-186.

Hinkle, S., Taylor, L., Fox-Cardamone, L., & Crook, K. (2011).

Intragroup identification and intergroup differentiation:

A multicomponent approach. British Journal of Social

Psychology, 28(4), 305-317.

Kamans, E., Gordijn, E., Oldenhuis, H., & Otten, S. (2009). What

I think, you see is what you get: Influence of prejudice on

assimilation to negative meta-stereotypes among Dutch

Moroccan teenagers. European Journal of Social Psychology,

, 842-851.

Leyens, J-Ph., Paladino, P. M., Rodríguez-Torres, R., Vaes, J.

Demoulin, S., & Rodriguez-Pérez, A. (2000). The emotional

side of prejudice. The attribution of secondary emotions to

ingroups and outgroups. Personality and Social Psychology

Review, 4, 186-197.

Leyens, J. Ph., Rodríguez-Pérez, Rodríguez-Torres, R., Gaunt, R.,

Paladino, M.P., & Vaes, J. (2001). Psychological essentialism

and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to

ingroups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 395-411.

Martin, C. L., & Parker, S. (1995). Folk theories about sex and

race differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,

, 45-57.

Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American

Psychologist, 44, 1469-1481.

Montalbán, F., & Gómez, L. (1995). Efectos de las discrepancias de

estatus sobre el comportamiento intergrupal. Revista Psicología

Social, 10(2), 219-233.

Morton, T. A., & Postmes, T. (2009). When differences become

essential: Minority essentialism in response to majority

treatment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35,

-668. doi:10.1177/0146167208331254

Pehrson, S., Brown, R., & Zagefka, H. (2009). When does national

identification lead to the rejection of immigrants? Crosssectional

and longitudinal evidence for the role of essentialist

in-group definitions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48,

-76. doi:10.1348/014466608X288827

Pereira, M., Estramiana, J. L., Vasconcelos, C., & Alves, M. (2010).

Essentialistic belief about policemen and criminals. Psicologia:

Teoria e Pesquisa, 26(4), 707-715

Pereira, M., Alvaro, J. L., Oliveira, A., & Dantas, G. (2011).

Stereotypes and the essencialization of black and White people:

a comparative study. Psicologia & Sociedade, 23(1), 144 - 153

Rothbart, M. & Taylor, M. (1992). Category label and social reality:

Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In K. Semin &

A. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition

(pp. 11-36). London: Sage.

Sherif, M. (1948). An outline of social psychology. New York:

Harper and Row.

Tajfel, H. (1957). Value and the perceptual judgement of magnitude.

Psychological Review, 64, 192-204

Tajfel, H. (1984). Grupos humanos y categorías sociales. Barcelona:

Herder.

Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social

group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup

relations (pp. 15-40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wagner, W., Holtz, P., & Kashima, Y. (2009). Construction and

deconstruction of essence in representing social groups:

Identity projects, stereotyping, and racism. Journal for the

Theory of Social Behavior, 39, 363-383.

Young, D. M., Sanchez, D. T., & Wilton, L. S. (2013). At the

Crossroad of Race: Racial ambiguity and biracial identification

influence psychological essentialist thinking. Cultural

Diversityand Ethnic Minority Psychology. 19(4), 461-467.

Yzerbyt, V., & Demoulin, S. (2010). Intergroup relations. In S.

T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The Handbook

of Social Psychology (5th edition, Vol 2, pp. 1024-1083).

Honoboken NJ: Wiley

Yzerbyt,V., & Rocher, (2002). Subjective essentialism and the

emergence of stereotypes. In C McGarty, V. Yzerbyt & R.

Spears (Eds.), Stereotypes as explanations: The formation of

meaningful belief about social groups (pp. 38-66). Cambridge:

University Press.

Yzerbyt, V., & Schadron, G. (1996). Connaitre et juger autrui: Une

introduction à la cognition sociale [Conocer y juzgar al otro:

una introducción a la cognición social]. Grenoble, Francia:

Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.

Yzerbyt, V., Judd, C., & Corneille, O. (2003). The Psychology of

group perception. New York: Psychology Press.

Yzerbyt, V., Rocher, S., & Schadron, G. (1997). Stereotypes

as explanations: A subjective essentialist view of group

perception: In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers & S. A.

Haslam (Eds.), The Social Psychology of Stereotyping and

Group Life. Oxford: Blackwell.

Zagefka, H., Nigbur, D., González, R., & Tip, L. (2013). Why

does ingroup essentialism increase prejudice against minority

members? International Journal of Psychology, 48(1), 60-68

Published

2017-02-02

How to Cite

Saldivia Ojeda, K., Mansilla Cofré, D., & Estrada Goic, C. A. (2017). Social identification and / or perception of similarity: An approach to differential effects on ingroup and outgroup essentialism. Psicologia: Teoria E Pesquisa, 32(2). Retrieved from https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/revistaptp/article/view/18001

Issue

Section

Comunicação Breve