Understanding The Madoff Fraud

A Criminological and Regulatory View

Authors

Keywords:

Financial fraud. Ponzi scheme. Criminal Behavior. White Collar Crime. Regulatory Oversight.

Abstract

[Purpose]  This study analyzed the case of Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme, investigating the causes, implications and regulatory failures that allowed this fraud to be perpetuated for so long

[Methodology/approach/design] We used a multidisciplinary approach that involved reviewing the literature, analyzing legal documents, regulatory reports and related academic research. We explored the structure of Madoff's Ponzi scheme, the factors that made it sustainable and the deficiencies in the regulatory system that allowed it to operate.

[Findings] The study revealed that Bernard Madoff created one of the largest Ponzi schemes in history, causing massive losses for investors. Regulatory failures, including ineffective SEC oversight, lack of coordination between regulatory agencies and conflicts of interest in audits, played a crucial role in perpetuating the fraud. Madoff's 150-year sentence and asset forfeiture were part of the legal measures taken to deal with the consequences of the fraud.

[Practical implications] The practical implications of this study highlight the importance of regulatory reforms to strengthen financial and securities supervision. In addition, it highlights the need to protect whistleblowers and promote a favorable environment for revealing wrongdoing in the financial sector in order to prevent future similar cases.

[Originality/value] This article fills a gap in the study of financial regulation by providing a comprehensive analysis of the Madoff case and its implications. Its relevance lies in the lesson it offers about the devastating consequences of financial fraud and the measures needed to protect investors and improve regulatory oversight.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alessandro Fernandes, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

[Purpose]  This study analyzed the case of Bernard Madoff's Ponzi scheme, investigating the causes, implications and regulatory failures that allowed this fraud to be perpetuated for so long

[Methodology/approach/design] We used a multidisciplinary approach that involved reviewing the literature, analyzing legal documents, regulatory reports and related academic research. We explored the structure of Madoff's Ponzi scheme, the factors that made it sustainable and the deficiencies in the regulatory system that allowed it to operate.

[Findings] The study revealed that Bernard Madoff created one of the largest Ponzi schemes in history, causing massive losses for investors. Regulatory failures, including ineffective SEC oversight, lack of coordination between regulatory agencies and conflicts of interest in audits, played a crucial role in perpetuating the fraud. Madoff's 150-year sentence and asset forfeiture were part of the legal measures taken to deal with the consequences of the fraud.

[Practical implications] The practical implications of this study highlight the importance of regulatory reforms to strengthen financial and securities supervision. In addition, it highlights the need to protect whistleblowers and promote a favorable environment for revealing wrongdoing in the financial sector in order to prevent future similar cases.

[Originality/value] This article fills a gap in the study of financial regulation by providing a comprehensive analysis of the Madoff case and its implications. Its relevance lies in the lesson it offers about the devastating consequences of financial fraud and the measures needed to protect investors and improve regulatory oversight.

References

AGNELLO, V.; AGNELLO, A. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 806: ten years later. The BRC Academy Journal of Business, vol. 3, n. 1, pp. 19-37, 2013.

BASU, K. Markets and Manipulation: Time for a Paradigm Shift?. Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 56, n. 1, pp. 185-205, 2018.

BECKER, G. S. The Economic Approach to Human Behavior. University of Chicago Press, 1978.

BERENSON, A. ’92 Ponzi Case Missed Signals About Madoff. The New York Times, 16 jan. 2009. Disponível em: <https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/17/business/17ponzi.html>.

COHEN, L.; FELSON, M. Social change and crime rate trends: a routine approach. American Sociological Review, n. 44: pp. 588-608, 1979.

DOCKING, D. S. The 2008 financial crises and implications of the Dodd-Frank Act. Journal of Corporate Treasury Management, vol. 4, n. 4, 2012.

DURKHEIN, Émile. As regras do método sociológico. Edipro, 2012, 160 p.

DURKHEIN, Émile. O suicídio. WMF Martins Fontes, 3 ed. 2019, 552 p.

FRANKEL, T. The Ponzi Scheme Puzzle: A History and Analysis of Con Artists and Victims. Oxford University Press, 2012.

FUERMAN, R. D. Bernard Madoff and the Solo Auditor Red Flag. Journal of Forensic & Investigative Accounting, vol. 1, n. 1, pp. 1-38, 2009.

GALVIS-CASTAÑEDA, I. E.; SANTOS-MERA, J. E. Geometría del fraude. Cuadernos de contabilidad, v. 18, n. 45, pp. 74-85, 2017.

GUIMARÃES, F.; SCHINCARIOL, V. O rombo de R$ 20 bi da Americanas deriva de contabilidade muito criativa. Valor Econômico, 17 jan. 2023, p. A7.

HENRIQUES, D. B. Bernard Madoff, Architect of Largest Ponzi Scheme in History, Is Dead at 82. The New York Times, 14 abr. 2021. Disponível em: <https://www.nytimes.com/2021/04/14/business/bernie-madoff-dead.html>.

HIMENES, H. S. B.; PINTO, L. L. M. S.; FERREIRA, A. F. ESTUDO DE CASO SOBRE A FRAUDE NO CONTROLE DE EMISSÕES DE POLUENTES DA VOLKSWAGEN. Revista Ibero-Americana de Humanidades, Ciências e Educação, v. 7, n. 5, pp. 657-673, 2021.

JAPIASSÚ, C. E. A.; SOUZA, A. B. G. Criminologia e delinquência empresarial: da cultura criminógena à cultura do compliance. Revista Quaestio Iuris, vol. 10, n. 2, pp. 1031-1051, 2017.

KRAINER, R. E. Regulating Wall Street: The dodd–frank act and the new architecture of global finance, a review. Journal of Financial Stability, vol. 8, n. 2, pp.121-133, 2012.

LOPES, A. F. A. G. M.O pensamento socioeconómico e o crime de colarinho branco. Dissertação de Mestrado (Mestrado em Direito e Economia). Universidade de Lisboa, 2018, 95 p.

MARQUES, D. L.; MAGALHÃES, V. A.; GONÇALVES, M. Casos e escândalos financeiros internacionais: uma revisão da literatura. In: XVII Congresso Internacional de Contabilidade e Auditoria, ISCAP, pp. 7-8, 2019.

MARTINI, I. L. Tratamento jurídico de pirâmides financeiras e esquemas Ponzi no Brasil e no Mundo. Dissertação de Mestrado (Programa de Pós-Graduação em Direito). Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2020, 161 p.

MURCIA, F. D.; DE SOUZA, F. C.; BORBA, J. A. Continuous auditing: A literature review. Revista Organizações em contexto, vol. 4, n. 7, pp. 1-17, 2008.

PIAZZETA, N. O. A mente criminosa: Direito Penal e a Neurobiologia da violência. Porto Alegre: Livraria do Advogado, 2018.

POMPIAN, M. M. Using behavioral investor types to build better relationships with your clients. Journal of Financial Planning, v. 21, n. 10, pp. 64-76, 2008.

POMPIAN, M. M. Risk tolerance and behavioral finance. Investments and Wealth monitor, Boston, v. 20, n. 31, pp. 34-45, 2017.

QUISENBERRY, W. L. Ponzi of All Ponzis: Critical Analysis of the Bernie Madoff Scheme. International Journal of Econometrics and Financial Management, vol. 5, n. 1, pp. 1-6, 2017.

ROCA, M. Theranos,¿ el unicornio que colapsa? Revista de Negocios, pp. 70-72, 2016.

ROSS, E. A. Social control: a survey of the foundations of order. Andesite Press, 2017, 482 p.

SAAD-DINIZ, E. Compliance en la perspectiva de la criminología económica. Derecho Penal y Criminología, ano 9, n. 3, pp. 252-267, 2019.

SAAD-DINIZ, E. Brasil vs. Golias: os 30 anos da responsabilidade penal da pessoa jurídica e as novas tendências em compliance. In. COUTINHO, F. P.; GRACIA, J. Atas do I curso sobre mecanismo de prevenção e combate a corrupção na Administração pública, pp. 7-41, 2020.

SUTHERLAND, Edwin. Crime de Colarinho Branco: Versão sem Cortes. Revan, 2015. 416 p.

TOLEDO, o. Criminologia administrativa restringe direitos fundamentais. Conjur, 27 out. 2013. Disponível em <https://www.conjur.com.br/2013-out-27/mauricio-toledo-criminologia-administrativa-restringe-direitos-fundamentais>.

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Bernard Madoff sentenced to 150 years in prison. Ohio, 29 jun. 2009. Disponível em: <https://www.justice.gov/archive/usao/nys/pressreleases/June09/madoffbernardsentencingpr.pdf>.

XAVIER, J. R. F. Reformar a justiça penal a partir de seu sistema de pensamento: por uma sociologia das ideias penais. Revista Direito e Práxis, vol. 6, n. 2, pp. 438-463, 2015.

Published

2024-10-12

How to Cite

FERNANDES, Alessandro. Understanding The Madoff Fraud: A Criminological and Regulatory View. Journal of Law and Regulation, [S. l.], v. 10, n. 2, p. 114–132, 2024. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/rdsr/article/view/51242. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2024.