New regulatory framework for the railway sector (the Railways Act)

A critical analysis under regulatory theories based on responsiveness

Authors

Keywords:

Brazilian railway sector. New regulatory design. Railways Act. Responsive regulation. Smart regulation.

Abstract

[Purpose] Based on the theoretical foundations of the main responsive theories, this article will analyze the new regulatory design of the rail transport sector, provided for by the new Railways Act (Act n° 14.273/2021) and to what extent the regulatory framework of the new governance identifies and adapts to the contributions of the enunciated theories and what benefits can come from its prediction and practical incorporation

[Methodology/approach/design] The article will be elaborated using the theoretical-normative approach. The presentation of the main theories based on responsiveness and the proposition of a specific pyramidal representation for the sector will play a central role in the proposed study. The article intends to carry out a comparison of the new regulatory legal framework of the railway sector with the enunciated theories, to demonstrate the hypothesis investigated.

[Findings] It demonstrates that the new regulatory framework has innovated the parameters used until then, considerably expanding the variety and possibility of combining strategies, mechanisms and responsive regulatory instruments that can be used. There was also an increase in the number of participants in regulation. Nevertheless, it is still necessary to improve regulatory governance and relevant regulatory arrangements of the new Railways Act for its effective implementation.

[Practical implications] The results can contribute to inform the various actors of the new regulatory design of the Brazilian rail transport sector, to lead them to improve the responsive matrix of legislation and concession and authorization contracts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Marconi Arani Melo Filho, AGU

Advogado da União, com Mestrado em Direito Constitucional pela UFPE, Especialização em Direito Administrativo pela UNIDERP e MBA em Economia, Gestão e Regulação pela FGV. Doutorando em Direito na UnB na linha “transformações na ordem social e econômica e regulação”. Atuou recentemente entre 2012 e 2019 na área de regulação e infraestrutura, tendo coordenado juridicamente o setor de transportes terrestres junto à Consultoria Jurídica do Ministério da Infraestrutura. E-mail: casemelo@gmail.com.

References

ARANHA, M. I. Direito das Telecomunicações: histórico normativo e conceitos fundamentais. 3ª ed., London: Laccademia Publishing, 2015.

ARANHA, M. I. Manual de Direito Regulatório: Fundamentos de Direito Regulatório. 5ª ed., London: Laccademia Publishing, 2019.

ASSIS, A. C. V. et al. Ferrovias de Carga Brasileiras: Uma Análise Setorial. BNDES Setorial, n. 46, 2017.

AYRES, I.; BRAITHWAITE, J. Responsive Regulation: Transcending the Deregulation Debate. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992.

BALDWIN, R.; BLACK, J. Really Responsive Regulation. LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers, Londres, v. 15, 2007.

BRAITHWAITE, J. To Punish or Persuade: Enforcement of Coal Mine Safety. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1985.

BRAITHWAITE, J. Responsive Regulation and Developing Economies. World Development, v. 34, n. 5, p. 884-898, 2006.

CONFEDERAÇÃO NACIONAL DA INDÚSTRIA. Novo marco legal ferroviário: avanços e pontos de atenção ao PLS 261/2018/Confederação Nacional da Indústria – Brasília: CNI, 2021.

DORF, M.; SABEL, C. (1998). A Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism. Cornell Law Faculty Publications. Paper 120.

EPL – EMPRESA DE PLANEJAMENTO E LOGÍSTICA. Transporte inter-regional de carga no Brasil. Panorama 2015, 2016.

FELIX, M. K. R.; CAVALCANTE FILHO, J. T. Marco Normativo do Setor Ferroviário Brasileiro: Caminhos para Superação da Insegurança Jurídica e Regulatória. Brasília: Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas/CONLEG/Senado, 2016.

GUNNINGHAM, N.; GRABOSKY, P. Smart Regulation: Designing Environmental Policy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.

KOLIEB, J. When to Punish, When to Persuade and When to Reward: Strengthening Responsive Regulation with the Regulatory Diamond. Monash University Law Review, v. 41, n. 1, p. 136-162, 2015.

LOPES, O. A. Fundamentos da regulação. Rio de Janeiro: Processo, 2018.

MASCINI, P. Why was the Enforcement Pyramid so Influential? And what price was paid? Regulation & Governance, v. 7, p. 48-60, 2013.

MÉLO FILHO, M. A. Da regulação responsiva à regulação inteligente: uma análise crítica do desenho regulatório do setor de transporte ferroviário de cargas no Brasil. Journal of Law and Regulation, [S. l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 144–163, 2020. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/rdsr/article/view/31093. Acesso em: 7 maio. 2022.

Published

2022-09-07

How to Cite

ARANI MELO FILHO, Marconi. New regulatory framework for the railway sector (the Railways Act): A critical analysis under regulatory theories based on responsiveness. Journal of Law and Regulation, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 2, p. 146–171, 2022. Disponível em: https://periodicos.unb.br/index.php/rdsr/article/view/43308. Acesso em: 27 nov. 2024.