The sufficiency and necessity of (Swinburne’s) Natural Theology

Authors

  • ROGEL ESTEVES DE OLIVEIRA Pontifícia Universidade Católica Rio Grande do Sul (PUCRS)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/2358-82842015e17380

Keywords:

Epistemology of Religion. Natural Theology. Justification of theism. Existence of God. Basic theistic belief.

Abstract

The conclusion of Swinburne’s book The existence of God is that “On our total evidence theism is more probable than not”. I will not dispute that conclusion, as others have done. I will concede that the conclusion is supported by Swinburne’s argument and that the argument is in fact “good”. I will question, however, the impact of that conclusion ”“ with the use of the argument that supports it - for the epistemological enterprise of justifying theistic belief, that is, the belief that God exists. Developing criticism given by Alvin Plantinga (2001), I will question the sufficiency and necessity of Swinburne’s probabilistic argument for the epistemic justification of a subject S’s belief that God exists, where S is a religious person, say, a Christian.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALSTON, William. Perceiving God: the epistemology of religious experience. Ithaca: Cornell

Univ. Press, 1991.

BRAUNSTEINER-BERGER, Julia. Swinburne’s argument for the existence of God: a critical

comment on conceptual issues. Religious Studies, 50, 2014, p. 359-378.

CHISHOLM, Roderick. Theory of knowledge. 3.ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1989.

FELDMAN, Richard. Epistemology. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall, 2003.

FORREST, Peter. The Epistemology of Religion. In: ZALTA, Edward N. (Ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia

of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition). Available in: <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/

spr2014/entries/religion-epistemology/>.

HAWTHORNE, John. Knowledge and lotteries. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2004.

HUEMER, Michael. Compassionate Phenomenal Conservatism. Philosophy and Phenomenological

Research, v. 74, n. 1, January 2007, p. 30-55.

MARTIN, Michael. Book review on The resurrection of God incarnate. Religious Studies, 40 (3),

, p. 367-71.

PLANTINGA, Alvin. Rationality and public evidence: a reply to Richard Swinburne. Religious

Studies, 37, 2001, p. 215-222.

------. Warranted Christian belief. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2000.

SWINBURNE, Richard. Epistemic justification. Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press, 2001.

------. Faith and reason. Oxford: Clarendon, 1981.

------. The existence of God. 2. ed. Oxford: Clarendon, 2004. [First edition 1979]

------. The resurrection of God incarnate. New York: Clarendon Press, 2003.

Published

2018-10-19

How to Cite

OLIVEIRA, R. E. D. (2018). The sufficiency and necessity of (Swinburne’s) Natural Theology. Brazilian Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 2(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.26512/2358-82842015e17380