O Pensamento Crítico pode ser fomentado por museus através do uso de redes sociais? E isso pode ser mensurado?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/museologia.v3i6.16735Palavras-chave:
cyber-aprendizagem, pensamento crítico, conferências virtuaisResumo
Com o crescimento do uso de ferramentas de cyber-aprendizagem (cyber-learning) por parte dos museus para envolver seus públicos-alvo, permanecem questões sobre o efeito dessas ferramentas sobre o pensamento crítico e a interação dos participantes. Apesar da existência de pesquisas sobre a que extensão o pensamento crítico é fomentado em ambientes formais de cyber-aprendizagem, há uma falta de pesquisas em ambientes informais de cyber-aprendizagem, como conferências virtuais. O objetivo do projeto era avaliar se o pensamento crítico poderia ser mensurado em conferências virtuais e em eu medida ele poderia ser estimulado. Uma abordagem de métodos mistos avaliando a logística de participação e a análise de conversas revelou que, embora o pensamento crítico tenha sido estimulado durante as conferências virtuais, apenas as primeiras fases, como a identificação e definição de problemas, foram utilizadas pelos participantes. As fases superiores do pensamento crítico, a exploração de problemas, a aplicação e a integração não foram muito utilizadas durante as conferências virtuais. O estudo também confirmou o papel crucial do moderador na facilitação da participação.
Downloads
Referências
ARMITT, G., SLACK, F., GREEN, S. & BEER, M. (2002).The development of deep learning during a synchronous collaborative on-line course. In Proceedings of CSCL 2002, Boulder, Colorado, USA. Lawrence Erlbaum, 151-158. Acessado em 20 de outubro de 2010 em http://shura.shu.ac.uk/53/1/fulltext.pdf
BAI, H. (2009). Facilitating students’ critical thinking in online discussion: An instructor’s experience. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8 (2), 156-164.
BROOKFIELD, S. D. (1987). Developing Critical Thinkers. San Francisco: Jossey Bass. BULLEN, M. (1998). Participation and critical thinking in online university distance education. The Journal of Distance Education, 13 (2), 1-32.
CAFFARELLA, R., & MERRIAM, S. (1999). Learning in Adulthood: a Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
ÄŒECH, C. G. & CONDON, S. L. (2004). Temporal properties of turn-taking and turn-packaging in Synchronous Computer-Mediated Communication. In Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Acessado em 20de Outubro em http://www.computer.org/portal/web/csdl/doi/10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265282
CURRAN, V., KIRBY, F., PARSONS, E., & LOCKYER, J. (2003). Discourse analysis of computer-mediated conferencing in world wide web-based continuing medical education. The Journal of Continuing Education in Health Progessions, 23, 229-238.
D’ANGELO, E. (1971). The Teaching of Critical Thinking. Amsterdam: B. R. Gruner DEWEY, J. (1933). How We Think. Boston: D. C. Heath.
DE WEVER, B., SCHELLENS, T., VALCKE, M., & VAN KEER, H. (2006). Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review. Computers and Education, 46, 6-28.
DI BLAS, N. & POGGI, C. (2006). 3D for Cultural Heritage and education: evaluating the impact. In J. Trant and D. Bearman (Eds.). Museums and the Web 2006: Proceedings, Toronto: Archives & Museum Informatics. Acessado em 20 de outubro de2010 em http://archimuse.com/mw2006/papers/diblas/diblas.htmlFINKELSTEIN,
J. (2006). Learning in Real Time: Synchronous Teaching and Learning Online. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
GARRISON, D. R. (1991). Critical thinking and adult education: a conceptual model for developing critical thinking in adult learners. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 10, 287-303.
GARRISON, D. R. (1992). Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: an analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult Education Quarterly, 42 (3), 136-148.
GARRISON, D. R., ANDERSON, T., & ARCHER, W. (2000). Critical thinking in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 11, 1”“14. Acessado em 20 de outubro de 2010 em http://communitiesofinquiry.com/documents/CTinTextEnvFinal.pdf
GARRISON, D. R., ANDERSON, T., & ARCHER, W. (2001). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15, 7”“23. Acessado em 20 de outubro de 2010 em http://communitiesofinquiry.com/documents/CogPresPaper_June30_.pdfGUNAWARDENA,
C. N., LOWE, C. A., & ANDERSON, T. (1997). Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17, 397”“431.
HARA, N., BONK, C. J., & ANGELI, J. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28, 115-152.
HENRI, F. (1992). Computer conferencing and content analysis. In A. R. Kaye (Ed.), Collaborative learning through computer conferencing. The Najadan Papers, 117-136. London: Springer-Verlag.
HOOPER-GREENHILL, E. (2007). Museums and Education: Purpose, Pedagogy, Performance. New York: Routledge.
KELLY, L. (2009). The impact of social media on museum practice. Paper presented at the National Palace Museum, Taipei, 20th October 2009. Acessado em 15 de novembro de 2010 em http://australianmuseum.net.au/Uploads/Documents/9307/impact%20of%20social%20media%20on%20museum%20practice.pdf
Learning Times (2010). Summary of evaluation results Climate Change online conference. Relatório não publicado.
LINCOLN, M., STOCKHAUSEN, L. & MALONEY, D. (1997) Learning Processes in Clinical Education. In McAllister, L., Lincoln, M., McLeod, S. & Maloney, D. (Eds), Facilitating Learning in Clinical Settings, 99-129. Cheltenham: Stanley Thornes.
LOPEZ X., MARGAPOTI, I., MARAGLIANO, R. & BOVE, G. (2010). The pres The presence of Web 2.0 tools on museum websites: a comparative study between England, France, Spain, Italy and the USA. Museum Management and Curatorship, 25 (2), 235-249 .
MASON, R. (1998). Globalising Education: Trends and Applications. London: Routledge.
MAURINO, (2006). Looking for Critical Thinking in Online Threaded Discussions. E-Journal of instructional Science and Technology, 9 (2). Acessado em 20 de outubro de 2010 em http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/e-jist/docs/vol9_no2/papers/full_papers/maurino.pdf
MACKNIGHT, C. B. (2000). Teaching critical thinking through online discussions. Educause Quarterly, 4, 38-41.
MCKENZIE, W., & MURPHY, D. (2000). “I hope this goes somewhere”: Evaluation of an online discussion group. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16 (3), 239-257.
MCPECK, J. E. (1981). Critical Thinking and Education. Oxford: Martin Robertson.
MONACO, P. & MOUSSOURI, T. (2009). A conversation about intended learning outcomes. Curator, 52 (4), 317-326.
National Science Foundation, (2008). Fostering Learning in the Networked World: The Cyberlearning Opportunity and Challenge. A 21st Century Agenda for the National Science Foundation Report of the NSF Task Force on Cyberlearning. Acessado em 20 de outubro de 2010 em http://nsf.gov/pubs/2008/nsf08204/nsf08204.pdf
NEUENDORF, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
NEWMAN, D. R., JOHNSON, C., COCHRANE, C. & WEBB, B. (1996). An experiment in group learning technology: evaluating critical thinking in face-to-face and computer-supported seminars, Interpersonal Computing and Technology 4 (1). Acessado em 20 de outubro de 2010 em <http://jan.ucc.nau.edu/~ipct-j/1996/n1/newman.htm/contents.htm>.
PEKARIK, A. J. (2010). From knowing to not knowing: moving beyond “outcomes”. Curator, 53 (1), 105-115.
PERKINS, C., & MURPHY, E. (2006). Identifying and measuring individual engagement in critical thinking in online discussions: An exploratory case study. Educational Technology & Society, 9 (1), 298-307. Acessado em 20 de outubro de 2010 em http://www.ifets.info/journals/9_1/24.pdf.
SMITH, M., CADIZ, J. J., & BURKHALTER, B. (2000). Conversation trees and threaded chats. In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. Acessado em 15 de novembro de 2010 em http://www.connectedaction.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/2000-CSCW-Conversation-trees-and-threaded-chats.pdf
SPROULL, L. & KIESLER, S. (1986). Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communication. Management Science, 32, 1492-1512.
VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
