Remembering the Presence. Possible Roles of the Museum of Contemporary Art Today
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/museologia.v6i12.16327Palavras-chave:
Ciências Sociais Aplicadas; Comunicação e InformaçãoResumo
Esse ensaio procura refletir sobre a maneira através da qual os museus de arte contemporânea tem lidado com proposições artísticas processuais, pelo menos desde a década de 1970, e como elas podem ser reapresentadas e/ou exibidas. Mais do que isso, procuramos discutir as práticas que os museus de arte contemporânea encontraram para reexibir tais proposições, uma vez que não se trata apenas de apresentar, mas de ativar e reencenar. Tal aspecto levanta questões, não só sobre os modos de documentação e exibição desses trabalhos, mas também o que é esperado do conceito de museu, bem como do que se entende pelo espectador delas, isto é, o público do museu.
Downloads
Referências
ARNS, Inke e HORM, Gabriele. History Will Repeat Itself: Strategien des Reenactment in der zeitgenössischen (Medien-) Kunst und Performance. Strategies of Re-enactment in Contemporary (Media) Art and Performance. Frankfurt am Main: Revolver Archiv für Aktuelle Kunst, 2007.
BATCHEN, Geoffrey et al. Deep Storage - Arsenale der Erinnerung; Sammeln, Speichern, Archivieren in der Kunst. Catalogue oft the exhibition “Deep Storage - Arsenale der Erinnerung”, München, Hausder Kunst, Berlin, nationalgalerie SMPK, Düsseldorf, Kunstmuseum im Ehrenhof, Seattle, Henry Art Gallery, 1997-1998, München/ New York: Prestel, 1997.
BAL-BLANC, Pierre e BISMARCK, Beatrice von. Timing: On the Temporal Dimension of Exhibiting, (Cultures of the Curatorial). Berlin: Sternberg Press, 2014.
BECKER, Howard. “Art as Collective Action”. In: American Sociological Review, Issue 39, 1974, pp.767-776.
BISMARCK, Beatrice von, MUNDER, Heike e SCHNEEMANN, Peter J. . NowTomorrow-Flux. An Anthology on the Museum of Contemporary Art. Zürich: JRP Ringier, 2017.
BISHOP, Claire. Radical Museology: Or What’s Contemporary in Museums of Contemporary Art? London: Koenig, 2013.CELANT, Germano. When Attitudes Become Form. Bern 1969/Venice 2013, Vendig: Fondazione Prada 2013.
CHAMRAD, Evelyn. Der Mythos vom Verstehen: ein Gang durch die Kunstgeschichte unter dem Aspekt des Verstehens und Nichtverstehens in der Bildinterpretation. Dissertation Universität Düsseldorf, 2001.
CORZO, Miguel Angel. Mortality Immortality? The Legacy of 20th-Century Art. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute, 1999.
ECO, Umberto. Opera aperta. Milano: Bompiani, 1962.
FEHR, Michael. “Das Museum als Ort der Beobachtung zweiter Ordnung”. In: BEIER, Rosmarie. Geschichtskultur in der zweiten Moderne. Frankfurt am Main: Campus, 2000, pp. 149-166.
FRASER, Andrea. “From the Critique of Institutions to an Institution of Critique”. In: Artforum, September 2005, pp. 278-283.
FUNCKE, Bettina. “Placing the Present in Relation to the Present”, in: BISMARCK, Beatrice von, MUNDER, Heike e SCHNEEMANN, Peter J. . Now-TomorrowFlux. An Anthology on the Museum of Contemporary Art. Zürich: JRP Ringier, 2017, pp.71-76.
GADAMER, Hans Georg. Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. [1960]. Tübingen: Mohr, 1990, p. 170.
GRASSKAMP, Walter. Das Kunstmuseum. Eine erfolgreiche Fehlkonstruktion. München: C.H. Beck, 2016.
GUMBRECHT, Hans Ulrich. Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. California: Stanford University, 2004.
HEMKEN, Kai-Uwe. Kritische Szenografie. Die Kunstausstellung im 21. Jahrhundert. Bielefeld: Transcript, 2015.
HUMMELEN, IJsbrand e SILLÉ, Dionne. Modern Art: Who Cares? Amsterdam: The Foundation forthe Conservation of Modern Art and the Netherlands Institute for Cultural Heritage, 1999.
KEMP, Wolfgang. “Kontexte. Für eine Kunstgeschichte der Komplexität”. In: Texte zur Kunst. 1991, Issue 2, pp.89-101.
KERNBAUER, Eva. Kunstgeschichtlichkeit. Historizität und Anachronie in der Gegenwartskunst. Paderborn-Fink: Wilhelm, 2015.
KIRSHENBLATT-GIMBLETT, Barbara. “Objects of Etnography”, in: LAVINE, Steven D. Exhibiting Cultures: The Poetics and Politics of Museum Display. Washington: Smithsonian Institution, 1991, pp. 386”“443.
McSHINE, Kynaston/ Museum of Modern Art (New York). The Museum as Muse: artists reflect. New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1999.
MURAWSKA-MUTHESIUS, Katarzyna e PIOTROWSKI, Piotr. From Museum Critique to the Critical Museum. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2015.
NOEVER, Peter / Österreichisches Museum für angewandte Kunst (Wien). Das diskursive Museum. Ostfildern-Ruit: Hatje Cantz, 2001.
PUTNAM, James. Art and Artifact. The Museum as Medium, London: Thames & Hudson, 2001.
SCHNEEMANN, Peter J. “Zeugen gesucht. Die Wirkung eines Kunstwerkes als Anekdote”. In: ARNI, Caroline et al.. Der Eigensinn des Materials. Erkundungen sozialer Wirklichkeit. Festschrift für Claudia Honegger zum 60. Geburtstag. Basel/Frankfurt am Main: Stroemfeld, 2007, pp. 395-409.
SHERMAN, Daniel J. Museum Culture: Histories, Discourses, Spectacles. [1994]. London: Routledge, 2001.
VO, Danh. Slip of the Tongue, Exhibition catalogue, “Slip of the Tongue”, 12.4.- 31.12.2015, Punta della Dogana, Venice, 2015.
WALTHER, Franz Erhard. OBJEKTE, benutzen. Köln/New York: Koenig, 1968.
WHARTON, Glenn, MOLOTCH, Harvey. “The Challenge of Installation Art”. RICHMOND, Alison et al.. In: Conservation. Principles, Dilemmas and Uncomfortable Truths. Amsterdam/ London: Elsevier/Butterworth-Heinemann; Victoria & Albert Museum, 2009, pp. 210”“222.
WYSS, Beat. “The Time of Things in Space: Exhibition-Making as Memorial Theater”. In: BISMARCK, Beatrice von, MUNDER, Heike e SCHNEEMANN, Peter J. . Now-Tomorrow-Flux. An Anthology on the Museum of Contemporary Art. Zürich: JRP Ringier, 2017, pp. 59-70.
