JE’ẼHA (Palavra)
questões morfossintáticas para adoção do Lexema no Dicionário Bilíngue da Língua Ka’apór
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/rbla.v17i1.61001Keywords:
Dicionário bilíngue, verbete, lexema, Língua Ka’apór, LexicografiaAbstract
This work proposes to adopt the word – je’ẽha – as an entry in the entries of the Ka’apór-Portuguese Bilingual Dictionary, the doctoral thesis of the present author and defended in 2009. The Ka’apór language was classified by Rodrigues (1985) as belonging to Branch VIII of the Tupí-Guaraní Family and throughout its history has undergone grammatical simplifications. The criterion for adopting the ‘word’ in the lemmas considers both the visibility of the lexeme in the structure of the lexicon and the grammar through morphosyntactic information in the forms of nouns, verbs, and postpositions arranged in the microstructure of this lexicographical work. The theoretical basis of Haensch, G. et al. (1982) and Zgusta (1971) recommend a dictionary model capable of reconciling the identification of the Ka’apór language through words with the characterization of grammatical attributes and diversity in forms and their functions in the communicative role of Ka’apór, arranged in the dictionary through grammatical indication and thematic class, examples, subentries, notes and cross-references.
Downloads
References
Cabral, Ana. 2001. Prefixos Relacionais na Família Tupí-Guaraní. Boletim da ABRALIN (25), 213-62.
Caldas, R.B.C. 2009. Uma Proposta de Dicionário para a Língua Ka’apór. Doutorado em Linguística, Universidade de Brasília.
Caldas, R.B.C. 2010. Dicionários bilíngues: uma reflexão acerca do tratamento lexical em línguas Tupí In: Línguas e Culturas Tupí. v.2, pp. 105-115.
Caldas, R.B.C; Cabral, A.S.A.C. 2006. Reestruturação de Antigos Contrastes Morfossintáticos em Ka’apór. Estudos da Linguagem, v.4, n., pp. 87-97.
Haensch, G. Wolf at al. 1982. La Lexicografía de la lingüística teórica a la práctica. Madrid: Gredos.
Duarte, Fábio Bonfim; Garcia, Mário Alexandre. 2006. Ergatividade cindida, papel temático e causativização na língua Ka’apor. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, v. 14, n. 2, p. 277-315.
Lopes, M. A. G. (Org.). 2007. Ymanihar Panduha - As Palavras Antigas. 1. ed. Belo Horizonte: FALE/UFMG e SECAD/MEC, 34p.
Lopes, M. A. G. 2009. Aspectos Gramaticais da Língua Ka´apor. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Rodrigues, A.D. 1985. Relações Internas na Família Linguística Tupi-Guarani. Revista de Antropologia, v.27/28, pp. 33-53.
Seki, Lucy. 2012. Discutindo dicionários bilíngues: o caso Kamaiurá. In: Abordagens sobre o Léxico em Línguas Indígenas. pp. 13-36.
Silva, Tabita F.; Caldas, Raimunda B.C. 2001. Subclasses de verbos em Ka’apór. Boletim da Abralin- Número Especial. Fortaleza: Imprensa Universitária/UFC, 2001. v. 26. pp. 599-601.
Zgusta, L. 1971. Manual of Lexicography. Paris: Mouton.
Zgusta, L. Equivalents and Explanations in Bilingual Dictionaries. 1971. Linguistics Research Center. The University of Texas at Austin and Department of Linguistics The University of Illinois. pp. 537-548.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Brasileira de Linguística Antropológica
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish in RBLA agree to the following terms:
a) Authors maintain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, and the work is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which allows the sharing of the work with recognition of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
b) Authors are authorized to assume additional contracts separately, for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publish in an institutional repository or as a book chapter), with recognition of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
c) Authors are allowed and encouraged to publish their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this can generate productive changes, as well as increase impact and citation of the published work.
