The role of a common european framework in the elaboration of national language curricula and syllabuses

Autores/as

  • Carlos A. M. Gouveia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v8i0.9186

Palabras clave:

Systemic Functional linguistics; Critical discourse Analysis; Positive discourse Analysis; Common European Framework of Reference for Languages.

Resumen

Following the Systemic Functional Linguistics based theory and methodology of Positive Discourse Analysis, this paper discusses some of the political, cultural and educational propositions motivating the Council of Europe’s document Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. A close reading of the text clearly shows that while attempting to promote a plurilingual approach to the learning of languages in Europe, the document also calls for a change in teaching practices aiming at a transformation in the dynamics of language relations in Europe. Some of the issues focused upon in the paper derive directly from the document’s stated objectives, namely questions of levelling, standardization, democracy and hegemony, on the one hand, and questions of plurality, independence, empowerment and difference, on the other.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

ALDERSON, J. C. (org.) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment: case studies. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Language Policy Division, 2002.
COUNCIL OF EUROPE. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
FULCHER, G. Are Europe’s tests being built on an ‘unsafe’ framework? Guardian Weekly, March 18th , 2004a.
FULCHER, G. Deluded by Artifices? The Common European Framework and Harmonization. Language Assessment Quarterly, 1(4): 252-266, 2004b.
HALLIDAY, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 3 ed. revised by C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. London: Arnold, 2004.
KEDDLE, J.S. The CEF and the secondary school syllabus. In: K. Morrow (org.) Insights from the Common European Framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004, pp. 43”“54.
MARTIN, J. R. Design and practice: enacting functional linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20: 116-126, 2000.
MARTIN, J. R. Positive Discourse Analysis: Solidarity and Change. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses, 49: 179-200, 2004.
MILANOVIC, M. (org.) Language examining and test development. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Language Policy Division, 2002.
MORROW, K. (org.) Insights from the Common European Framework. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
NORTH, B. Europe’s framework promotes language discussion, not directives. Guardian Weekly, April 15th , 2004.
TRIM, J. L. M. et al. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment ”“ A Guide for Users. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Language Policy Division, 2002.
van EK, J. A. Threshold Level English. London: Pergamon Press, 1980.
WEIR, C. J. Limitations of the Common European Framework for developing comparable examinations and tests. Language Testing, 22 (3): 281”“300, 2005.

Publicado

2010-11-17

Cómo citar

Gouveia, C. A. M. (2010). The role of a common european framework in the elaboration of national language curricula and syllabuses. Cadernos De Linguagem E Sociedade, 8, 8. https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v8i0.9186

Número

Sección

Artigos de pesquisa