Discurso e etnografia na pesquisa sobre letramento na comunidade.
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v8i0.9189Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis; ethnography; research methodology; literacy in the community.Abstract
In this paper on literacy in the community, I argue for the gains of research in discourse, particularly Critical Discourse Analysis, in combination with an ethnographic approach. If for one hand Discourse Analysis proposes to be a tool to make clear the ideological investments in textual materiality (Fairclough, 1992), on the other hand such investment is partially raised in social practices and their networks, of which it is a part. From the relation of discourse with other aspects of social practice, such as participant’s systems of values, beliefs and knowledge in the events, upsurges the need to incorporate an ethnographic approach, as much as a mode of knowledge production as a set of techniques implemented to generate data on those aspects of social practice.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Barton, D. & M. Hamilton. Local literacies. London: Routledge, 1998.
Blommaert, J. Comments and reflections. Linguistic Ethnography in the UK. BAAL/CUP Seminar. University of Leicester, 2001.
Blommaert, J. & C. BULCAEN. Critical Discourse Analysis. Annua Review of Anthropology 29: 447-466, 2000.
Chouliaraki, L. Regulative practices and heteroglossia in one institutional setting: the case off a ‘progressivist’ English classroom. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Linguistics Department, University of Lancaster, 1995.
Chouliaraki, L. & N. Fairclough. Discourse in late modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.
Fairclough, N. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
Fairclough, N. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman, 1995.
Frey, J. & A. Fontana. Interviewing: the art of science. In: N.Denzin & Y. Lincoln, (orgs.) Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 1998, pp. 47-78.
Halliday, M.A.K. Introduction to functional grammar, 2ed. London: Edward Arnold, 1994.
Halliday, M.a.k. & R. hasan. Language, context and text: aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.
HAMMERSLEY, M. & P. ATKINSON. Ethnography: principles in practice. London: Routledge, 1995.
HAMMERSLEY, M. Ethnography and discourse analysis: incompatible or complementary?. Polifonia, 10: 1-20, 2005. Labov, W. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.
Lummis, T. Structure and validity in oral evidence. In: R. Perks and A. Thomson (orgs.) The oral history reader. London: Routledge, 1998, pp. 273-283. McKracken, D. The long interview. London, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 1988.
Malinowski, B. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge, 1922.
Marcus, G. & M. Fischer. Anthropology as cultural critique. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1986.
Pitt, K. The discourse of family literacy. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Linguistics Department, Lancaster University, 2001. Rios, G. Literacy discourses in two socioeconomically differentiated neighbourhoods in Brazil. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Lancaster: Linguistics Department, Lancaster University, 2003.
Street, B. Social literacies: critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. London: Longman, 1995.
Blommaert, J. Comments and reflections. Linguistic Ethnography in the UK. BAAL/CUP Seminar. University of Leicester, 2001.
Blommaert, J. & C. BULCAEN. Critical Discourse Analysis. Annua Review of Anthropology 29: 447-466, 2000.
Chouliaraki, L. Regulative practices and heteroglossia in one institutional setting: the case off a ‘progressivist’ English classroom. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Linguistics Department, University of Lancaster, 1995.
Chouliaraki, L. & N. Fairclough. Discourse in late modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999.
Fairclough, N. Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
Fairclough, N. Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman, 1995.
Frey, J. & A. Fontana. Interviewing: the art of science. In: N.Denzin & Y. Lincoln, (orgs.) Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 1998, pp. 47-78.
Halliday, M.A.K. Introduction to functional grammar, 2ed. London: Edward Arnold, 1994.
Halliday, M.a.k. & R. hasan. Language, context and text: aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.
HAMMERSLEY, M. & P. ATKINSON. Ethnography: principles in practice. London: Routledge, 1995.
HAMMERSLEY, M. Ethnography and discourse analysis: incompatible or complementary?. Polifonia, 10: 1-20, 2005. Labov, W. Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1972.
Lummis, T. Structure and validity in oral evidence. In: R. Perks and A. Thomson (orgs.) The oral history reader. London: Routledge, 1998, pp. 273-283. McKracken, D. The long interview. London, Thousand Oaks, California: Sage, 1988.
Malinowski, B. Argonauts of the Western Pacific. London: Routledge, 1922.
Marcus, G. & M. Fischer. Anthropology as cultural critique. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1986.
Pitt, K. The discourse of family literacy. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Linguistics Department, Lancaster University, 2001. Rios, G. Literacy discourses in two socioeconomically differentiated neighbourhoods in Brazil. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Lancaster: Linguistics Department, Lancaster University, 2003.
Street, B. Social literacies: critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. London: Longman, 1995.
Downloads
Published
2010-11-17
How to Cite
Rios, G. (2010). Discurso e etnografia na pesquisa sobre letramento na comunidade. Papers of Language and Society, 8, 63. https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v8i0.9189
Issue
Section
Artigos de pesquisa
