O envolvimento como estratégia para assegurar a compreensão

Authors

  • Isaltina Mello Gomes

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v5i0.6516

Keywords:

Interactional involvement. Scientific discourse in the press. Journalistic interviews.

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to examine the function of ‘involvement’ in journalistic interviews with scientists that object to scientific vulgarization made by the daily press. We have used as our main theoretical foundation the studies by Chafe (1984, 1985). The Jornal do Commercio was chosen as the vehicle-target for this investigation because of its Ciência/Meio Ambiente section, published since 1989, with a specialized staff on environment, science and technology. We used four interviews for the analysis, which have allowed us to identify some characteristics of linguistic behaviour of the participants (scientists and journalists). Our analysis shows that, in this kind of interaction, more than a characteristic trace inherent to verbal interactions, ‘involvement’ is a strategy which aims to guarantee the comprehension of what is uttered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Chafe, W. L. Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oralliterature. In: Tannen, D. (ed.) Spoken and written language: Advances in discourseprocesses. Norwood: Ablex, 1984, p. 35-53.

Chafe, W. L. Linguistic differences produced by differences betweenspeaking and writing. In: Olson, D.; Torrance, N. e Hildyard, A. (eds.)Literacy, language and learning: The nature and consequences of reading and writing.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985, p. 105-123.

Dascal, M. Dez maneiras de ser incompreendido (e algumas sugestõespara evitá-las). Mímeo, s.d.

Dascal, M. e Weizman, E. Contextual explotation of interpretation cluesin text understanding: an integrating model. In: Vershueren, J. e Bertucceli-Papi, M. (eds.) The pragmatic perspective. Amsterdã: John Benjamins, 1987,p. 31-46.

Gumperz, J. Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1982.

Marcuschi, L. A. O processo inferencial na compreensão de textos. Relatório apresentado ao CNPq: Recife, mímeo, 1989.

Taylor, T. J. Do you understand? Criteria of understanding in verbalinteraction. Language & Communication, 6 (3): 171-180, 1986.

Published

2010-11-24

How to Cite

Gomes, I. M. (2010). O envolvimento como estratégia para assegurar a compreensão. Papers of Language and Society, 5, 76. https://doi.org/10.26512/les.v5i0.6516

Issue

Section

Artigos de pesquisa

Most read articles by the same author(s)